Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Relapse in rheumatoid arthritis patients undergoing dose reduction and withdrawal of biologics: are predictable factors more relevant than predictive parameters? An observational prospective real-life study
  1. Olivier Vittecoq1,
  2. Sandra Desouches1,
  3. Marie Kozyreff1,
  4. Julia Nicolau2,
  5. Sophie Pouplin1,
  6. Pascal Rottenberg1,
  7. Nicolas Sens1,
  8. Thierry Lequerre1,
  9. Gilles Avenel1
  1. 1Rouen University Hospital, Department of Rheumatology, Rouen, France
  2. 2Rheumatology, Hospital Centre Dieppe, Dieppe, Haute-Normandie, France
  1. Correspondence to Dr Olivier Vittecoq; vittecoq.olivier{at}wanadoo.fr

Abstract

Objective To determine predictive/predictable factors of relapse in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients undergoing biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs) dose reduction/discontinuation.

Patients and methods RA patients receiving the same bDMARD for more than 1 year, in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) remission, were selected in an observational monocentric real-life study. The 18-month follow-up included spacing (6 months) and withdrawal (12 months) periods of bDMARD. Clinical, biological and ultrasonographic (US) parameters were collected regularly. Relapse was defined by SDAI>11.

Results Fifty-three RA patients (mean age: 58 years; 72% women; median duration: 11 years) were enrolled. Forty-two received anti-cytokinic bDMARD targeting tumour necrosis factor (n=39) or interleukin-6R (n=3) and 11 were treated by abatacept. The number of relapses during the spacing and discontinuation periods were 19 and 20, respectively. After 18 months of follow-up, among the 53 patients, 12 maintained bDMARD-free remission, 39 had relapsed and 2 were lost of follow-up. Median time to relapse was 11.8 months. In multivariate analysis, baseline factors predictive of relapse were corticosteroid intake, female gender, longer disease duration and no methotrexate intake with bDMARD. Concerning the survival analysis, also taking into account the factors of predictability, the main risk factor of relapse after discontinuation was an increase of SDAI >0 during the spacing period (p=0.03). US findings were not contributive.

Conclusion In the context of RA in remission under bDMARDs, variation of SDAI during the dose-reduction phase is more relevant than baseline parameters to predict success of drug withdrawal.

  • rheumatology
  • rheumatoid arthritis
  • ultrasonography
  • discontinuation
  • prediction

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors OV, SD, TL and GA were involved in the conception and the design of this study. OV, SD, SP and TL were involved in the acquisition of clinical data. MK, JN, PR and NS performed the ultrasonographic assessments. OV and GA were involved in the statistical analysis. OV, SD, TL and GA were involved in the analysis and interpretation of the data. All authors were involved in the drafting and revision of the manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Ethics approval The study (E2014-28) was approved by the local institutional review board (named Ethics Committee for Non-Interventional Research) according to law n° 2012-300.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.