Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Patient safety in inpatient mental health settings: a systematic review
  1. Bethan Thibaut1,
  2. Lindsay Helen Dewa1,
  3. Sonny Christian Ramtale1,
  4. Danielle D'Lima2,
  5. Sheila Adam1,
  6. Hutan Ashrafian1,
  7. Ara Darzi1,
  8. Stephanie Archer1,3
  1. 1 NIHR Imperial Patient Safety Tranlsational Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
  2. 2 Centre for Behaviour Change, Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
  3. 3 Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Stephanie Archer; stephanie.archer{at}imperial.ac.uk

Abstract

Objectives Patients in inpatient mental health settings face similar risks (eg, medication errors) to those in other areas of healthcare. In addition, some unsafe behaviours associated with serious mental health problems (eg, self-harm), and the measures taken to address these (eg, restraint), may result in further risks to patient safety. The objective of this review is to identify and synthesise the literature on patient safety within inpatient mental health settings using robust systematic methodology.

Design Systematic review and meta-synthesis. Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Health Management Information Consortium, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science were systematically searched from 1999 to 2019. Search terms were related to ‘mental health’, ‘patient safety’, ‘inpatient setting’ and ‘research’. Study quality was assessed using the Hawker checklist. Data were extracted and grouped based on study focus and outcome. Safety incidents were meta-analysed where possible using a random-effects model.

Results Of the 57 637 article titles and abstracts, 364 met inclusion criteria. Included publications came from 31 countries and included data from over 150 000 participants. Study quality varied and statistical heterogeneity was high. Ten research categories were identified: interpersonal violence, coercive interventions, safety culture, harm to self, safety of the physical environment, medication safety, unauthorised leave, clinical decision making, falls and infection prevention and control.

Conclusions Patient safety in inpatient mental health settings is under-researched in comparison to other non-mental health inpatient settings. Findings demonstrate that inpatient mental health settings pose unique challenges for patient safety, which require investment in research, policy development, and translation into clinical practice.

PROSPERO registration number CRD42016034057.

  • patient safety
  • mental health
  • inpatient settings
  • systematic review

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • BT and LHD are joint first authors.

  • Twitter @dewalindsay

  • Contributors BT, LD, SCR, SAr and DD contributed to the design, data searches, data extraction, synthesis and writing of the report. HA contributed to the design, data extraction, meta-analysis and writing of the report. SAd and AD contributed to the design and synthesis, as well as writing and critically reviewing the report.

  • Funding This work is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Imperial Patient Safety Translation Research Centre. Infrastructure support was provided by the NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.