You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 9, Issue 11
  • Pneumococcal pneumonia and carriage in Africa before and after introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines, 2000–2019: protocol for systematic review

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

XML
Infectious diseases
Protocol
Pneumococcal pneumonia and carriage in Africa before and after introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines, 2000–2019: protocol for systematic review
  1. Newton L. Kalata1,
  2. Tinashe K. Nyazika1,2,
  3. Todd D. Swarthout1,
  4. Dean Everett1,3,
  5. Neil French1,4,
  6. Robert S. Heyderman1,5,
  7. Stephen B. Gordon1,2,
  8. Kondwani C. Jambo1,2
  1. 1Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi
  2. 2Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
  3. 3The Queens Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  4. 4Centre for Global Vaccine Research, Institute of Infection and Global Health, Liverpool, UK
  5. 5Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Mr Tinashe K. Nyazika; tknyazika{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction Africa harbours a high burden of pneumococcal disease, with associated high mortality rates. Despite 34 countries introducing the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, which reduces the risk of pneumococcal carriage (a prerequisite for disease) of some of the most pathogenic pneumococcal serotypes, it remains uncertain whether they will achieve the sustained direct or indirect protection necessary to reduce pneumococcal carriage to levels sufficient to interrupt transmission and disease. We will therefore summarise the available data on the impact of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in reducing vaccine serotype carriage and pneumococcal pneumonia in Africa between 2000 and 2019.

Methods and analysis Using a predetermined search strategy, we will conduct a comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE database, the Excerpta Medica Database, the ISI Web of Science (Science Citation Index), Scopus and the African Index Medicus to identify published studies reporting the prevalence of Streptococcus pneumoniae carriage (vaccine type and non-vaccine type), incidence rates of pneumococcal pneumonia and mortality among children, adults and HIV-infected (all-ages) pre-pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) and post-PCV introduction (published between 1st January 2000 and 31st December 2019) in African countries that have introduced PCVs (PCV7/PCV10/PCV13) in their routine national immunisation programme. The studies retained and data extracted will be assessed for bias using prevalidated tools and checklists. Heterogeneity across studies will be assessed using the χ2 test on Cochrane Q statistic. A random effect meta-analysis will be used to estimate the overall prevalence of pneumococcal carriage and incidence of pneumococcal pneumonia across studies with similar characteristics. Results will be reported in compliance with the Meta-Analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. The protocol has been prepared in accordance to the 2015 guidelines on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Ethics and dissemination This systematic review will not require ethical approval as we will be using already published data. The final manuscript will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences.

PROSPERO registration number CRD42019130976.

  • Streptococcus pneumoniae
  • Carriage
  • Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine
  • Pneumococcal pneumonia
  • mortality
  • Africa

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030981

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Strengths and limitations of this study

    • To the best of our knowledge, this study will be the first systematic review that will comprehensively compare and explore the impact of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) on carriage, pneumococcal pneumonia (invasive and non-invasive) and mortality associated with the disease prevaccine and postvaccine introduction in adults and other at risk groups living in Africa.

    • Small number of studies eligible across regions could impact the quality of our estimates.

    • Presence of high heterogeneity across studies, particularly in countries where PCV7, PCV10 or PCV13 were in use around the same time and were serotyping was only done for vaccine-type pneumococcal strains.

    Introduction

    Streptococcus pneumoniae (‘the pneumococcus’) is a common coloniser of the nasopharynx and a major cause of morbidity and mortality among children under the age of 5 years worldwide.1 2 High rates of pneumococcal disease are found in Africa and other low-income and middle-income countries, which harbour an accumulation of factors conducive for high and persistent pneumococcal carriage and transmission including, high-density living conditions, poverty and high HIV seroprevalence.3–5In 2015, pneumococcal pneumonia accounted for 55.4% (95% uncertainty interval: 31.5–79.1) of lower respiratory deaths in all ages.1 Implementation of treatment strategies, which focus on early detection and antimicrobial therapy of suspected pneumonia cases, has been difficult in Africa.6 Therefore, introduction of an effective vaccine against pneumococcal carriage for children is crucial in this region as carriage is a prerequisite for disease.

    With support from Gavi (the Vaccine Alliance), 34 African countries introduced the pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV7/PCV10/PCV13) into their extended immunisation programmes between 2009 and 20157 8 in line with WHO recommendations.9 These vaccines have been shown to be highly effective in reducing both incidence of pneumococcal disease and prevalence of carriage by some of the most pathogenic of the 97 known pneumococcal serotypes.10 Furthermore, the vaccine indirectly protects the PCV-unvaccinated population against pneumococcal carriage and disease by reducing pneumococcal transmission from PCV-vaccinated children who are at greater risk of carriage and, therefore, sources of transmission.2 11–13 However, PCV’s indirect protection on other high-risk populations (including HIV-infected individuals) remains to be seen in Africa.11 14 Studies conducted in Africa have demonstrated high nasopharyngeal carriage of pneumococcus among the HIV-infected adults on antiretroviral therapy (ART), with estimated point prevalence ranging between 40% and 80%.12 15 Therefore, it remains uncertain whether the introduction of PCV in Africa will achieve the sustained direct or indirect protection necessary to reduce pneumococcal carriage to levels sufficient to interrupt transmission and disease.16

    Systematic reviews that have been done so far on the impact of PCV in Africa have focused on carriage and clinical pneumonia endpoints in children.17 18 None have summarised these data in the adult or important at-risk populations like HIV-infected individuals. We therefore plan to synthesise the available published data and update the evidence on the impact of the PCV introduction on pneumococcal carriage, pneumococcal pneumonia and associated mortality in Africa between 2000 and 2019.

    Objectives

    General objectives

    1. To summarise available data on the impact of the PCV on the prevalence of pneumococcal carriage (vaccine type - VT and non-vaccine type - NVT) and its impact on pneumococcal pneumonia and associated mortality in Africa between 2000 and 2019.

    Specific objectives

    Using data published between 2000 and 2019, this review will assess the impact of PCV by:

    1. Comparing the trend in pneumococcal carriage prevalence in Africa before and after PCV introduction.

    2. Comparing the trends in the incidence and/or prevalence of pneumococcal pneumonia (invasive and non-invasive) in Africa before and after PCV introduction.

    3. Estimating the mortality associated with pneumococcal pneumonia in Africa.

    Methods

    ​Information sources, search strategy and study identification

    We will conduct a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, MEDLINE database, the Excerpta Medica Database, the ISI Web of Science (Science Citation Index), Scopus and the African Index Medicus to identify all studies published between 1st January 2000 to 31st December 2019, meeting our inclusion and exclusion criteria using the literature search strategy outlined in table 1. Using a structured screening guide, we will screen the reference lists for eligible articles and relevant reviews as well as conference abstracts to identify additional sources of information. Search results will be compiled and managed using the EndNote X9 citation software.

    View this table:
    Table 1

    Search strategy

    ​Eligibility criteria of relevant studies

    ​Inclusion criteria

    Population

    Children (0–15 years), adults (15–64 years), the elderly (>65 years) and HIV-infected individuals (all ages) residing in African countries.

    Intervention

    PCVs (PCV 7, PCV10 and PCV13) introduction into the country’s routine infant immunisation programmes.

    Comparators

    Ten-year period (2000–2010) before PCV introduction versus 10-year period (2011–2019) after PCV introduction.

    Outcomes

    Percentage difference in the pooled point prevalence of pneumococcal carriage post when compared with pre-PCV introduction; adjusted prevalence ratios in the pooled prevalence of pneumococcal pneumonia between post-PCV and pre-PCV introduction; and adjusted mortality rate ratios for post-PCV and pre-PCV introduction.

    Type of studies

    We will include randomised control trials, non-randomised trials and observational studies reporting prevalence of pneumococcal carriage and/or incidence rates for disease and/or deaths and were published between 1st January 2000 and 31st December 2019 without language restriction.

    Serotyping methods

    For pneumococcal carriage, identification and serotyping of S. pneumoniae must be from a pernasal swab using culture (as per WHO guidelines,19 PCR (lyt-A gene amplification), microarray or based on whole genome sequencing (WGS).

    Pneumococcal pneumonia

    For a pneumococcal pneumonia diagnosis among adults, a minimum of either (1) symptoms consistent with an acute chest infection (at least cough or dyspnoea) or (2) new infiltrates on radiograph and (3) pneumococcal antigen detection in either blood, urine or pleural fluid. For children (1–15 years), the case definition is the criteria for adults plus symptoms of fast breathing, chest-indrawing and nasal flaring. These definitions have been adopted in order to increase the specificity of identifying pneumococcal pneumonia but are limited in their sensitivity.

    ​Study exclusion criteria

    1. Any study reporting impact data of vaccines within 12 months of PCV introduction into routine extended programme of immunisation and data reported in such a way that impact cannot be defined without data from within 12 months of PCV introduction.

    2. Studies with small sample size (less than 50 participants), letters, commentaries, narratives and editorials, will be excluded as they are likely to have biased estimates, and this could affect our estimates.

    3. Studies that did not distinguish between pre-PCV and post-PCV introduction periods in the data presented.

    ​Data extraction

    Three independent reviewers (NLK, TKN and TDS) will assess the articles for inclusion based on a predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Those included after initial screening will be further evaluated for methodological quality and presence of bias. Discordance will be resolved by discussion between reviewers to reach consensus or by a fourth member of the team (KJ). All articles retrieved will be stored and managed using Endnote X9 throughout the review process. A standardised data extraction form designed specifically for each outcome of interest, will be used to collect information on the following parameters:

    1. Study identification: name of first author, year of publication, year of participant inclusion, country, type of publication, language of publication.

    2. Study characteristics: study design (eg, cross-sectional, cohort, case control, clinical trial), setting (hospital, outpatient, population, institution (eg, school or care facility), urban/rural), period of surveillance/recruitment, sample size, age (mean or median, range), proportion of HIV-infected participants and method of confirmation (if any), proportion on ART (if any), proportion PCV-vaccinated (if any), proportion with natural pneumococcal carriage (VT, NVT, total), diagnostic method for pneumococcal carriage detection and serotyping (culture, PCR, DNA microarray, WGS), diagnostic criteria for pneumococcal pneumonia, duration of follow-up for cohort studies and mortality rates.

    3. Epidemiological estimates of pneumococcal carriage: prevalence of VT and NVT carriage.

    4. Epidemiological estimates for pneumococcal pneumonia: prevalence and/or incidence of pneumococcal pneumonia and/or mortality in all subpopulations, where reported (infants below age of 1 year, children 1–4 years, children 5–15 years and adults 16+years), the elderly and HIV infected. When estimates are not available or cannot be computed, the corresponding authors will be contacted to request for any missing information of these estimates.

    ​Appraisal of quality of reporting and the risk of bias

    We will assess the quality of reporting of the studies using either the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology or the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials checklist depending on the nature of the study (observational study or clinical trial).20–22

    We will use the 10-item risk of bias tool for prevalence studies developed by Hoy et al23 to assess the risk of bias for all the studies included using the full text publications. Bias risk scores will be presented in a table and inter-rater agreement will be assessed using a weighted Cohen’s kappa statistic.24 25

    ​Data analyses and reporting

    We will use the metaprop command provided within the STATA software V.15 to analyse the data.26 Heterogeneity of studies with similar study characteristics will be evaluated by the χ2 test on Cochrane’s Q statistic27 and quantified using I2 values assuming that I2 of 25%, 50% and 75% represent low, medium and high heterogeneity, respectively.28 Study-specific estimates will be pooled through a random effect meta-analysis to obtain an overall summary estimate of the prevalence of S. pneumoniae carriage, incidence of pneumococcal pneumonia and mortality after stabilising the variance of individual studies using the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation.29 For impact of PCV on carriage, the percentage change in point prevalence will be calculated to compare pooled prevalence estimates in the before and after PCV introduction periods. Mortality rate ratios will be calculated to compare pooled mortality rates for the periods before and after PCV introduction. Meta-analysis results will be presented on a forest plot. Visual analysis of funnel plot and Egger’s test will be done to detect small study effect.30 31 All tests will be two-sided and statistical significance will be defined as p<0.05. In case of marked heterogeneity, a descriptive analysis will be done instead of a meta-analysis.

    We will report our results according to the Meta-Analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines.32 The process with which studies were selected will be summarised using a flow diagram. Reasons for study exclusion will be described and quantitative data will be presented in summary tables and graphs (for trends) where appropriate.

    ​Ethics and dissemination

    This systematic review will not require ethical approval as we will be using already published data. The findings will be summarised in a manuscript and submitted in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences.

    ​Patient and public involvement

    This systematic review will use published scientific data and will not involve patients or members of the public.

    Acknowledgments

    The Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme (MLW) receives a strategic grant from the Wellcome Trust (UK).

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Troeger C,
      2. Forouzanfar M,
      3. Rao PC, et al
      . Estimates of the global, regional, and national morbidity, mortality, and aetiologies of lower respiratory tract infections in 195 countries: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet Infect Dis2017;17:1133–61.doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30396-1
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    2. ↵
      1. Heinsbroek E,
      2. Tafatatha T,
      3. Phiri A, et al
      . Pneumococcal carriage in households in Karonga District, Malawi, before and after introduction of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccination. Vaccine2018;36:7369–76.doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.021
      OpenUrl
    3. ↵
      1. Vos T,
      2. Barber RM,
      3. Bell B, et al
      . Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. The Lancet2015;386:743–800.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60692-4
      OpenUrl
    4. ↵
      1. Melegaro A,
      2. Gay NJ,
      3. Medley GF
      . Estimating the transmission parameters of pneumococcal carriage in households. Epidemiol Infect1999;132:433–41.doi:10.1017/S0950268804001980
      OpenUrl
    5. ↵
      1. Hill PC,
      2. Townend J,
      3. Antonio M, et al
      . Transmission of Streptococcus pneumoniae in rural Gambian villages: a longitudinal study. Clin Infect Dis2010;50:1468–76.doi:10.1086/652443
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    6. ↵
      1. Pio A
      . Standard case management of pneumonia in children in developing countries: the cornerstone of the acute respiratory infection programme. Bull World Health Organ2003;81:298–300.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    7. ↵
      1. Loharikar A,
      2. Dumolard L,
      3. Chu S, et al
      . Status of new vaccine introduction — worldwide, September 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep2016;65:1136–40.doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6541a3
      OpenUrl
    8. ↵
      1. Wang SA,
      2. Mantel AF,
      3. Dobo MG
      . Progress in introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine—worldwide, 2000-2013. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep2013;62:308–11.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    9. ↵
      1. WHO Publication
      . Pneumococcal vaccines WHO position paper - 2012 - recommendations. Vaccine2012;30:4717–8.doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.04.093
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    10. ↵
      1. Chaguza C,
      2. Cornick JE,
      3. Andam CP, et al
      . Population genetic structure, antibiotic resistance, capsule switching and evolution of invasive pneumococci before conjugate vaccination in Malawi. Vaccine2017;35:4594–602.doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.07.009
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    11. ↵
      1. Verani JR,
      2. Massora S,
      3. Acácio S, et al
      . Nasopharyngeal carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae among HIV-infected and –uninfected children. Plos One2018;13:e0191113.
    12. ↵
      1. Heinsbroek E,
      2. Tafatatha T,
      3. Chisambo C, et al
      . Pneumococcal acquisition among infants exposed to HIV in rural Malawi: a longitudinal household study. Am J Epidemiol2016;183:70–8.doi:10.1093/aje/kwv134
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    13. ↵
      1. Lexau CA, et al
      . Changing epidemiology of invasive pneumococcal disease among older adults in the era of pediatric pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. JAMA2005;294:2043–51.doi:10.1001/jama.294.16.2043
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    14. ↵
      1. Bonten MJM,
      2. Huijts SM,
      3. Bolkenbaas M, et al
      . Polysaccharide conjugate vaccine against pneumococcal pneumonia in adults. N Engl J Med2015;372:1114–25.doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1408544
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    15. ↵
      1. Swarthout TD,
      2. Fronterre C,
      3. Lourenço J, et al
      . High residual prevalence of vaccine serotype Streptococcus pneumoniae carriage 4 to 6 years after introduction of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in Malawi: a prospective serial cross-sectional study. bioRxiv2018.
    16. ↵
      1. Olayinka F,
      2. Ewald L,
      3. Steinglass R
      . Beyond new vaccine introduction: the uptake of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in the African region. Pan Afr Med J2017;27:1–4.doi:10.11604/pamj.supp.2017.27.3.11531
      OpenUrl
    17. ↵
      1. Alicino C,
      2. Paganino C,
      3. Orsi A, et al
      . The impact of 10-valent and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines on hospitalization for pneumonia in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vaccine2017;35:5776–85.doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.09.005
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    18. ↵
      1. Ngocho JS,
      2. Magoma B,
      3. Olomi GA, et al
      . Effectiveness of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines against invasive pneumococcal disease among children under five years of age in Africa: a systematic review. PLoS One;14:e0212295.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0212295
    19. ↵
      1. Satzke C,
      2. Turner P,
      3. Virolainen-Julkunen A, et al
      . Standard method for detecting upper respiratory carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae: Updated recommendations from the World Health Organization Pneumococcal Carriage Working Group. Vaccine2013;32:165–79.doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.08.062
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    20. ↵
      1. von Elm E,
      2. Altman DG,
      3. Egger M, et al
      . Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ2007;335:806–8.doi:10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    21. ↵
      1. Schulz KF,
      2. Altman DG,
      3. Moher D, et al
      . Consort 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ2010;340.doi:10.1136/bmj.c332
    22. ↵
      1. Turner L,
      2. Shamseer L,
      3. Altman DG, et al
      . Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals. In: Cochrane methodology review group, editor. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 5, 2012.doi:10.1002/14651858.MR000030.pub2
    23. ↵
      1. Hoy D,
      2. Brooks P,
      3. Woolf A, et al
      . Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement. J Clin Epidemiol2012;65:934–9.doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.11.014
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    24. ↵
      1. Cohen J
      . Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull1968;70:213–20.doi:10.1037/h0026256
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    25. ↵
      1. McHugh ML
      . Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med2012:276–82.doi:10.11613/BM.2012.031
    26. ↵
      1. Nyaga VN,
      2. Arbyn M,
      3. Aerts M
      . Metaprop: a Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data. Arch Public Health2014;72.doi:10.1186/2049-3258-72-39
    27. ↵
      1. Huedo-Medina TB,
      2. Sánchez-Meca J,
      3. Marín-Martínez F, et al
      . Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I² index?Psychol Methods2006;11:193–206.doi:10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.193
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    28. ↵
      1. Delgado-Rodríguez M,
      2. Sillero-Arenas M
      . Systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Intensiva2018;42:444–53.doi:10.1016/j.medin.2017.10.003
      OpenUrl
    29. ↵
      1. White IR
      . Multivariate Random-effects meta-analysis. Stata J2009;9:40–56.doi:10.1177/1536867X0900900103
      OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    30. ↵
      1. Sterne JAC,
      2. Egger M
      . Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. J Clin Epidemiol2001;10.
    31. ↵
      1. Sterne JAC,
      2. Sutton AJ,
      3. Ioannidis JPA, et al
      . Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ2011;343:d4002.doi:10.1136/bmj.d4002
    32. ↵
      1. Stroup DF,
      2. Berlin JA,
      3. Morton SC, et al
      . Meta-Analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (moose) group. JAMA2000;283:2008–12.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science

    Footnotes

    • NLK and TKN are joint first authors.

    • NLK and TKN contributed equally.

    • Contributors NLK, TKN, KJ and TDS conceived the study and drafted the manuscript. The manuscript was revised by DE, SBG, NF, RSH and KJ. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript. TKN is the guarantor of the manuscript.

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Patient consent for publication Not required.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.