Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Knowledge of and attitudes toward clinical trials in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study
  1. Nedal Al-Rawashdeh1,2,3,4,
  2. Rana Damsees1,2,3,4,
  3. Majed Al-Jeraisy1,3,4,
  4. Eman Al Qasim1,3,4,
  5. Ahmad M Deeb1,3,4
  1. 1 Research Office, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  2. 2 The Office of Scientific Affairs and Research, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
  3. 3 King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  4. 4 Ministry of the National Guard - Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  1. Correspondence to Ahmad M Deeb; rn_a_deeb{at}hotmail.com

Abstract

Objectives Clinical trials (CTs) are considered an important method for developing new treatments and providing access to potentially effective drugs that are still under investigation. Measuring the public’s knowledge of and attitudes toward CTs is important for assessing their readiness for and acceptance of human drug testing, which has previously not been assessed in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). The objective of this study is to explore the Saudi public’s knowledge of and attitudes toward CTs as well as participation in trials to test new or approved drugs.

Design Cross-sectional.

Setting The 2016 Al Jenadriyah cultural/heritage festival in Riyadh, KSA.

Participants Participating booths and exhibition halls, as well as festival visitors, were approached to participate in the study.

Primary and secondary outcome measures Knowledge of and attitudes toward CTs.

Results The final number of participants was 938. The responses were converted to a percentage mean score (out of 100) for each knowledge-related response and attitude. The total mean knowledge score was 56.8±24.8 and the attitude-related score was 61.5±28.0. Although most of the participants supported testing approved or off-label and new drugs on adult and paediatric patients, only a third (30.5%) agreed that new drugs could be tested on healthy volunteers. The results indicated that gender, educational level, income, medical background, age and health insurance were independently associated with the level of knowledge of CTs. In terms of attitudes toward CTs, the factors that were independently associated were gender, educational level and medical background.

Conclusions The Saudi public has a low level of knowledge and a moderately positive attitude toward CTs. There is a moderate positive correlation between the two factors such that as knowledge of CTs increases, the Saudi public will hold more positive attitudes toward CTs.

  • knowledge
  • attitudes
  • clinical trials

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors AMD and NAR: Conception and design, data acquisition, data collection, analytical plan and drafting of the manuscript. RD: Conception and design and data acquisition. MAJ: Conception and design, data acquisition and supervision. EAQ: Conception and design and data collection. All authors have critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content, approve of the final version to be published and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

  • Funding This study was supported by research grant RC16/010/R from the King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabai.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Ethics approval This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, KSA.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement Data are available upon reasonable request.