Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Impacts of Brexit on fruit and vegetable intake and cardiovascular disease in England: a modelling study
  1. Paraskevi Seferidi1,
  2. Anthony A Laverty1,
  3. Jonathan Pearson-Stuttard1,2,
  4. Piotr Bandosz2,3,
  5. Brendan Collins2,
  6. Maria Guzman-Castillo2,
  7. Simon Capewell2,
  8. Martin O’Flaherty2,
  9. Christopher Millett1
  1. 1 Public Health Policy Evaluation Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
  2. 2 Department of Public Health & Policy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
  3. 3 Department of Preventive Medicine and Education, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
  1. Correspondence to Paraskevi Seferidi; paraskevi.seferidi14{at}imperial.ac.uk

Abstract

Objectives To estimate the potential impacts of different Brexit trade policy scenarios on the price and intake of fruits and vegetables (F&V) and consequent cardiovascular disease (CVD) deaths in England between 2021 and 2030.

Design Economic and epidemiological modelling study with probabilistic sensitivity analysis.

Setting The model combined publicly available data on F&V trade, published estimates of UK-specific price elasticities, national survey data on F&V intake, estimates on the relationship between F&V intake and CVD from published meta-analyses and CVD mortality projections for 2021–2030.

Participants English adults aged 25 years and older.

Interventions We modelled four potential post-Brexit trade scenarios: (1) free trading agreement with the EU and maintaining half of non-EU free trade partners; (2) free trading agreement with the EU but no trade deal with any non-EU countries; (3) no-deal Brexit; and (4) liberalised trade regime that eliminates all import tariffs.

Outcome measures Cumulative coronary heart disease and stroke deaths attributed to the different Brexit scenarios modelled between 2021 and 2030.

Results Under all Brexit scenarios modelled, prices of F&V would increase, especially for those highly dependent on imports. This would decrease intake of F&V between 2.5% (95% uncertainty interval: 1.9% to 3.1%) and 11.4% (9.5% to 14.2%) under the different scenarios. Our model suggests that a no-deal Brexit scenario would be the most harmful, generating approximately 12 400 (6690 to 23 390) extra CVD deaths between 2021 and 2030, whereas establishing a free trading agreement with the EU would have a lower impact on mortality, contributing approximately 5740 (2860 to 11 910) extra CVD deaths.

Conclusions Trade policy under all modelled Brexit scenarios could increase price and decrease intake of F&V, generating substantial additional CVD mortality in England. The UK government should consider the population health implications of Brexit trade policy options, including changes to food systems.

  • brexit
  • fruits and vegetables
  • cardiovascular disease
  • trade policy
  • diet

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Supplementary materials

Footnotes

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Contributors PS, AAL, JP-S, MO and CM conceived the study. PS and PB analysed the data with inputs from JP-S, BC, MG-C, AAL and MO. PS drafted the paper with inputs from AAL, CM, JP-S, BC, MG-C, SC and MOF. All authors made a substantial contribution to the data interpretation and critical review of the submitted manuscript.

  • Funding PS, AAL and CM are funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) via a Research Professorship Award to CM (grant number: RP 2014-04-032). NIHR had no role in the design, analysis or writing of this article. The Public Health Policy Evaluation Unit is grateful for the support of the NIHR School of Public Health Research.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement Model input data are available on request from the corresponding author.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.