You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 9, Issue 1
  • Examining reliability of WHOBARS: a tool to measure the quality of administration of WHO surgical safety checklist using generalisability theory with surgical teams from three New Zealand hospitals

Article info

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

XML
Surgery
Research
Examining reliability of WHOBARS: a tool to measure the quality of administration of WHO surgical safety checklist using generalisability theory with surgical teams from three New Zealand hospitals

Authors

  • Oleg N Medvedev Center for Medical and Health Sciences Education, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Alan F Merry Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Carmen Skilton Center for Medical and Health Sciences Education, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Derryn A Gargiulo Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Simon J Mitchell Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Jennifer M Weller Center for Medical and Health Sciences Education, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  1. Correspondence to Dr Oleg N Medvedev; o.medvedev{at}auckland.ac.nz
View Full Text

Citation

Medvedev ON, Merry AF, Skilton C, et al
Examining reliability of WHOBARS: a tool to measure the quality of administration of WHO surgical safety checklist using generalisability theory with surgical teams from three New Zealand hospitals
BMJ Open 2019;9:e022625. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022625

Publication history

  • Received March 12, 2018
  • Revised October 1, 2018
  • Accepted November 6, 2018
  • First published January 9, 2019.
Online issue publication 
January 13, 2021
Previous versions
Review history

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Copyright information

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.