Article Text

Download PDFPDF

88 Governmental implementation of community bystander defibrillation program and good neurological outcome in out-­of-­hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA)
  1. PC Ko1,
  2. MF Yang1,
  3. YW Chen2,
  4. SA Ho3,
  5. SC Huang3,
  6. CL Shih4
  1. 1National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan
  2. 2Taipei City Fire Department, Taiwan
  3. 3Taipei City Health Department, Taiwan
  4. 4Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan

Abstract

Aim We examined the effect of governmental implementation of community­-wide bystander defibrillation program on good neurological outcome in patients after OHCA during a four-year prospective follow-­up period.

Method A prospective 4 year community-wide observational database collected from an OHCA e–Registry in a metropolitan was studied, after a citywide bystander defibrillation rescue program had been launched by the government that legitimised the strategic provision of AEDs (automated external defibrillators) in certain public locations and electronically registered the devices. Outcomes included 2–hour sustained ROSC (return of spontaneous circulation) at hospital, survival to hospital discharge, and good CPC (Cerebral Performance Category Scale 1 or 2). All patient pre­hospital characteristics and outcome relations were evaluated and adjusted by regression analysis.

Results The density of public AEDs distribution increased from 0.85 to 6.24 per square kilometres in the studied 4 years. Among a total of 12,368 OHCA, 1210 occurred in public locations, and 52 patients (male for 83%, witnessed arrest for 77%) received bystander aid by public accessed AED and CPR rescue. For these 52 patients, 44.2% (23/52) achieved pre­hospital ROSC at scene or during transport, 67.3% (35/52) achieved sustained ROSC after resuscitation at hospital, 44.2% (23/52) achieved survival–to–discharge and noticeably all those 23 (100%, 23/23) survival-to-discharge patients achieved excellent neurological outcome of CPC 1. Their outcomes were significantly better (67.3 vs 26.5%, OR: 5.7 [95% CI: 3.2 to 10.4] for sustained ROSC; 44.2 vs 10.1%, OR: 7.0 [95% CI: 3.9 to 12.6] for survival-to-discharge; 44.2 vs 6.6%, OR: 11.6 [95% CI: 6.4 to 21.2] for good CPC 1or2, and 100 vs 62.9% for good CPC among survival-to–discharge) compared with those without public accessed AED plus CPR rescue. In all 52 patients, there was one man without pre­hospital ROSC still achieved survival-to-discharge and good CPC.

Conclusion In our study, we found that governmental implementation of bystander defibrillation rescue program was significantly associated with excellent neurological outcome of CPC 1 and higher survival to hospital discharge. It would be noticeably in our community that by this rescue program all patients achieving survival–to–discharge could achieve excellent CPC1.

Conflict of interest None

Funding None

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.