Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Management of sepsis in out-of-hours primary care: a retrospective study of patients admitted to the intensive care unit
  1. Feike J Loots1,2,3,
  2. Marleen Smits1,
  3. Carlijn van Steensel1,
  4. Paul Giesen1,
  5. Rogier M Hopstaken4,5,
  6. Arthur R H van Zanten6
  1. 1 Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  2. 2 Emergency Department, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, The Netherlands
  3. 3 Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  4. 4 STAR-SHL, Etten-Leur, The Netherlands
  5. 5 Department of General Practice, School of Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands
  6. 6 Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to Feike J Loots; F.J.Loots-2{at}umcutrecht.nl

Abstract

Objectives Timely recognition and treatment of sepsis is essential to reduce mortality and morbidity. Acutely ill patients often consult a general practitioner (GP) as the first healthcare provider. During out-of-hours, GP cooperatives deliver this care in the Netherlands. The aim of this study is to explore the role of these GP cooperatives in the care for patients with sepsis.

Design Retrospective study of patient records from both the hospital and the GP cooperative.

Setting An intensive care unit (ICU) of a general hospital in the Netherlands, and the colocated GP cooperative serving 260 000 inhabitants.

Participants We used data from 263 patients who were admitted to the ICU due to community-acquired sepsis between January 2011 and December 2015.

Main outcome measures Contact with the GP cooperative within 72 hours prior to hospital admission, type of contact, delay from the contact until hospital arrival, GP diagnosis, initial vital signs and laboratory values, and hospital mortality.

Results Of 263 patients admitted to the ICU, 127 (48.3%) had prior GP cooperative contacts. These contacts concerned home visits (59.1%), clinic consultations (18.1%), direct ambulance deployment (12.6%) or telephone advice (10.2%). Patients assessed by a GP were referred in 64% after the first contact. The median delay to hospital arrival was 1.7 hours. The GP had not suspected an infection in 43% of the patients. In this group, the in-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher compared with patients with suspected infections (41.9% vs 17.6%). Mortality difference remained significant after correction for confounders.

Conclusion GP cooperatives play an important role in prehospital management of sepsis and recognition of sepsis in this setting proved difficult. Efforts to improve management of sepsis in out-of-hours primary care should not be limited to patients with a suspected infection, but also include severely ill patients without clear signs of infection.

  • sepsis
  • diagnosis
  • after hours care
  • primary care
  • general practice

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors FJL and PG conceived the study. MS and ARHvZ helped in its design. FJL, MS, CvS and ARHvZ were responsible for data assembly, collection and analysis. FJL, RMH and ARHvZ were responsible for data interpretation. FJL drafted the manuscript. MS, RMH, PG and ARHvZ provided significant revisions for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Ethics approval The medical ethics committee of the Radboud university medical center Nijmegen approved the study (file number 2015-2209).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement No additional data are available.