Article Text

Download PDFPDF

How do care home staff understand, manage and respond to agitation in people with dementia? A qualitative study
  1. Penny Rapaport1,2,
  2. Gill Livingston1,
  3. Olivia Hamilton1,
  4. Rebecca Turner1,
  5. Aisling Stringer1,
  6. Sarah Robertson1,2,
  7. Claudia Cooper1
  1. 1 UCL Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
  2. 2 North Thames CLAHRC, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Penny Rapaport; p.rapaport{at}ucl.ac.uk

Abstract

Objectives Little is known about how care home staff understand and respond to distress in residents living with dementia labelled as agitation. The aim of this study was to describe how care home staff understand and respond to agitation and the factors that determine how it is managed.

Design We conducted a qualitative thematic analysis.

Setting We recruited staff from six care homes in South East England including residential and nursing homes of differing sizes run by both the private and charity sector and located in urban and rural areas.

Participants We interviewed 25 care home staff using purposive sampling to include staff of either sex, differing age, ethnicity, nationality and with different roles and experience.

Results We identified four overarching themes: (1) behaviours expressing unmet need; (2) staff emotional responses to agitation; (3) understanding the individual helps and (4) constraints on staff responses. Staff struggled with the paradox of trying to connect with the personhood of residents while seeing the person as separate to and, therefore, not responsible for their behaviours. Staff often felt powerless, frightened and overwhelmed, and their responses were constrained by care home structures, processes and a culture of fear and scrutiny.

Conclusions Responding to agitation expressed by residents was not a linear process and staff faced tensions and dilemmas in deciding how to respond, especially when initial strategies were unsuccessful or when attempts to respond to residents’ needs were inhibited by structural and procedural constraints in the care home. Future trials of psychosocial interventions should support staff to identify and respond to residents’ unmet needs and include how staff can look after themselves.

  • dementia
  • agitation
  • care homes
  • psychosocial interventions
  • care staff

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors All authors made a substantial contribution to this work. PR, CC and GL contributed to the conception and design of the study and PR drafted the paper. All authors critically revised it and gave final approval for this version to be published. PR collected all the data and coded all the interview transcripts. OH, RT, AS and SR coded some of the interview transcripts. PR, CC and GL then organised the data into preliminary themes.

  • Funding This study was funded by a grant from the UK Economic and Social Research Council and the National Institute of Health Research Grant number NIHR/ESRC ES/L001780/1. CC and GL are supported by the UCLH NIHR Biomedical Research Centre. This research was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care North Thames at Bart’s Health NHS Trust (NIHR CLAHRC North Thames).

  • Disclaimer The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Ethics approval London (Queen’s Square) National Research Ethics Service (NRES) committee gave approval (reference: 14/LO/0697) for the study.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement The data will be made available by the authors on request.