Responses

PDF

Continuity of care with doctors—a matter of life and death? A systematic review of continuity of care and mortality
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Continuity of Care : What Patients Want
    • Patricia A Wilkie, Social scientist President and Chairman National Association for Patient Participation

    Patients have long known the benefits to their well being of seeing the same doctor . GPs have described the relevance of continuity in academic studies. The benefits are described in literature (see Berger A Fortunate Man). The current organisation of and future plans envisaged for general practice by policy makers make it increasingly difficult for patients to receive continuity.Fewer GPs work with a personal list, the practise provides the continuity.
    The research by Pereira Gray et al is the first study to give hard evidence that where used by doctors, continuity of cares associated with lower mortality rates. N.A.P.P. representing millions of UK patients in general practice, welcomes this research and hopes it can be replicated in other work.
    Most importantly, patients and their organisations need to lobby policy makers and professionals to ensure that the importance of continuity of care is built into future plans for general practice.

    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.