Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Association between recreational drug use and sexual practices among people who inject drugs in Southwest China: a cross-sectional study
  1. Shu Su1,
  2. Lei Zhang1,2,3,4,
  3. Feng Cheng2,
  4. Shunxiang Li5,
  5. Shifu Li5,
  6. Jun Jing2,5,
  7. Christopher Kincaid Fairley3,4,
  8. Liang Chen5,
  9. Jinxian Zhao5,
  10. Limin Mao6
  1. 1 School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  2. 2 Research Center for Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
  3. 3 Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  4. 4 Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  5. 5 Division of HIV/AIDS and STI Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Yuxi Prefecture, Yunnan, China
  6. 6 Center for Social Research in Health, Faculty of Arts and Social Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Lei Zhang; lei.zhang1{at}monash.edu and Professor Feng Cheng; fcheng{at}mail.tsinghua.edu.cn

Abstract

Objective To describe the differences in sexual practices among individuals with various drug administration patterns.

Setting A detoxification centre in Southwest China, a part of the Chinese national sentential surveillance network for hepatitis C virus (HCV), HIV and syphilis infections, was recruited.

Participants A total of 610 newly enrolled injection drug users (IDUs) from detoxification centre were included during 2015.

Primary and secondary outcome measures Self-reported sexual activities, drug-related practices and laboratory-confirmed HCV, HIV and syphilis infection status were collected.

Results Of the 610 IDU, 295 (48.4%) used heroin only, 277 (45.4%) poly-drug users reported the mixed use of synthetic drugs (SDs) with heroin and 38 (6.2%) used SDs only. The average daily drug injection frequency for poly-drug users (3.3±1.2 times) was the highest, followed by heroin-only (2.2±0.8 times) and SD-only users (1.2±0.4 time). SD-only drug users reported the highest proportion (86.8%) of engaging in sexual activities in the previous month, with more than half (54.5%) reporting any condomless sex. A higher frequency of daily injecting in heroin-only users was significantly correlated with the less likelihood of sex, condomless sex in the past month, having sex with fixed partners, condomless commercial sex in the previous 12 months (all p<0.01). In poly-drug users, who injected drugs two times per day was associated with the highest proportion of people who engaged in sex and commercial sex (p<0.05). For SD-only users, increased drug use was not associated with reducing sexual risk (p>0.05). Different patterns of HCV, HIV and syphilis infections prevalence rates were shown among the IDU depending on the roles and length of exposure.

Conclusions The daily drug injecting frequency of heroin-only and poly-drug users was negatively associated with sexual activities, but SD-only users kept a high frequent engagement in sex. The interventions for relevant diseases should adapt to characteristics of IDU.

  • synthetic drugs
  • heroin
  • poly-drug use
  • intravenous drug users
  • drug dependence
  • sexually transmitted infections

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Strengths and limitations of this study

  • A study that comprehensively compares the demographic characteristics, drug-related practices, sexual practices and infection status among synthetic drug (SD) only users, heroin-only users and poly-drug users in a national sentential surveillance setting.

  • It explores the underlying associations between users having different administration of drugs use and sexual behaviours.

  • It shows the status of people injecting SDs and adds to the evidence for harm reduction and sexually transmitted infections prevention in drug era with increasing numbers of SDs.

  • Potential recall bias may exist in the study since drug-related behaviours and sexual behaviours were from the participants self-report.

  • The number of respondents who only injected SDs was small, which will reduce statistical power regarding analysis.

Background 

Recreational drug use is a significant public health concern worldwide, and those who inject drugs may experience severe health consequences from the drug harms, bloodborne infections due to sharing of contaminated injection equipment and inequity in accessing healthcare services.1 2 While the size of this population has continued to grow during the recent decade, access to health services underpinned by harm reduction principles has remained low (about one in six in this population).3 Consequently, specific disease burdens in this population are disproportionally high globally: in 2015, approximately 13.3% people who inject drugs are living with HIV, and 50.8% are living with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.3

In China, since the 21st century, unsafe drug use, especially heroin use, has contributed to surging epidemics of bloodborne infections, such as HCV and HIV.4 In the last decade, synthetic drug (SD) use increased throughout China. In 2015, the use of SD in China exceeded heroin use for the first time. The most common SDs, such as methamphetamines, have strong euphoric effects and have been associated with prolonged sexual activity.5–8 The combination of sexual risk and injecting drug use creates a complex with the mixture of exposure that may facilitate the spread of bloodborne viral and sexually transmissible infections.8–11 Moreover, drug users in China generally consume SD via snorting, but currently, drug users have shown an increasing trend on injecting SD for a more intense high, which is consistent with the reports in other countries.12 13 Though compared with heroin, SD injection is still used on a small scale, this intake method is estimated to bring more unpredicted harm than previous way. Furthermore, it has been documented that 30%–40% of heroin users in China nowadays also use SD and some SD users inject heroin at the same time as well to maximise pleasure, with the proportion expected to grow rapidly in the next few years.14 15 This poly-drug use is associated with more harmful drug effects and high-risk behaviours. As different drugs act on bodies in various ways to cause sedation, the drug effects would be magnified by using multiple drugs. For example, concurrent use of cocaine and heroin (the mixture being dubbed as a ‘speedball’) has a synergistic impact on reducing norepinephrine release and reuptake.16 Hence, poly-drug intake, although at the same dosage as a single drug, can cause much stronger sexual stimulus.17 18 However, the specific effects of how these various drug-using patterns facilitate bloodborne viral and sexually transmissible infections transmission mainly including HCV, HIV and syphilis infections remain unknown in China.

Yuxi, located in central area of Yunnan province, is renowned for its drug trafficking and consumption in China, which may result in some of the highest rates of HIV, syphilis and HCV infections in China.19 Specifically, from 2005 to 2016, a total of 3092 unique HIV-positive people were diagnosed in this region, accounting for 0.13% of its total local population, with 326 being classified as newly infected in 2016. Further, 763 newly infected syphilis cases and 470 HCV-positive cases were notified in this area in 2016.20 21 Thus, Yuxi is a proper study setting to investigate the relationship between HCV, HIV and syphilis infections transmission and injection drug users (IDUs), especially in the era of the constant emergence of new SDs. This study aims to identify the characteristics among different drug users and assess if different pattern and doses in drug use were associated with the sexual practice of drug users.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted in the largest detoxification centre in Yuxi, which is also one of the Chinese national HCV, HIV and syphilis infections sentential surveillance sites that routinely collect data from designated priority populations. As China has harsh antinarcotics policies, if drug users are arrested by the police or reported by the community, they should be put in the detoxification centre compulsively for quitting drugs. Currently, China has 700 detoxification centres, and these centres housing a total of 350 000 people,22 so the population from detoxification centre can represent the general drug users in China. The eligibility criteria included the following: (1) recent injection of recreational drugs in the previous week, (2) being 18 years of age or older, (3) residing in Yuxi in the previous 3 months and (4) provision of written informed consent. This paper reports findings from our secondary data analysis (stripped of any personal identifier) of these local routinely collected biobehavioural surveillance data.

Data were collected between 26 January 2015 and 11 December 2015. On the first day of their admission to the detoxification centre, all participants were offered to self-complete a paper survey, with 15 min completion time on average. The questionnaire was used by the Chinese CDC as part of their routine sentential surveillance system nationally, which include all sites in Yunnan province. It covered key sociodemographic characteristics, patterns of latest drug consumption and a range of sexual practices. Specifically, the list of recreational drugs under investigation included heroin, cocaine, methamphetamine, ketamine and ecstasy, the participants reported whether they used one or more of them. The routes of drug administration were intravenous, smoking, snorting and oral ingestion. Inquiries into sexual activities were assessed by six questions (with a yes/no answer). The first set of two questions were ‘Did you have any sex in the previous month?’ and if yes, whether condoms were used for sex in the same period. The second set of questions were: ‘Did you engage in any commercial sexual activities in the previous 12 months?’ and if yes, whether condoms were used for commercial sex in the same period. The third set of questions were: ‘Did you have sex with a fixed/regular partner in the previous 12 months?’ and if yes, whether condoms were used for sex with the partner in the same period.

We differentiated ‘poly-drug users’ as those who used both heroin and any SDs concurrently from heroin-only users and SD-only users. Specifically, heroin-only users are people who only used heroin and did not use SD before. While SD-only users are people who used one or more of drugs in cocaine, methamphetamine, ketamine and ecstasy and did not use heroin before. The participants were classified into three categories according to their drug use. The comparison of demographic characteristics, drug-related behaviours, sexual practice and infection status was conducted between three groups. The relationship between sexual practice and drug injection frequency was explored within each drug group.

Each survey participant also undertook linked blood and urine test. Serological detection of HIV, HCV and syphilis infections followed standard Chinese national diagnostic guidelines in which: HIV-positivity was confirmed by ELISA screening and western blotvalidation23; HCV-positivity was confirmed by detection of HCV antibodies through repeated, independent ELISA testing24 and syphilis-positivity was confirmed by rapid plasma reagin circle card test screening with Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay validation. Laboratory-confirmed HIV, HCV or positive syphilis cases were notified and referred, following the standard clinical referral pathways. The urine detection results of drug residuals were used to corroborate with self-reported drug consumption in the previous week.

Statistical analysis

All data analyses were conducted on SAS V.9.4 (SAS Institute). Descriptive and subsequent inferential analyses were performed. Comparisons across three subgroups were conducted using Wald X2 test. Two multiple linear regression models were built to assess the relationship between drug use frequencies and sexual practices in each category of drug users. Dependent variable of two regression models were drug users having sexual activities and drug users having condomless sexual behaviours, respectively. Sexual activities in the model were defined by having sex in the previous 1 month, engaging in any commercial sexual activities in the previous 12 months and having sex with a fixed/regular partner in the previous 12 months. Accordingly, condomless sexual behaviours were defined by having condomless sex in the previous 1 month, having condomless sex during commercial sexual activities in the previous 12 months, having condomless sex with a fixed/regular partner in the previous 12 months. Demographic and drug-related variables with a p<0.2 in the simple linear regression were included as the independent variable in the multiple linear regression. A p<0.05 was considered significant in the final model.

Patient and public involvement

This paper conducts secondary data analysis (stripped of any personal identifier) of these local routinely collected biobehavioural surveillance data, the patients and public were not involved in this study.

Results

A total of 610 (71.9%) eligible registrants out of the 848 new entrants at the YuXi detoxification centre in 2015 were included, where 191 (22.5%, 133 were SD-only, 23 were heroin-only users and 35 were poly-drug users) non-IDUs, 34 (4.0%) non-current drug injection users (not in the previous week prior to entry) and 13 (1.5%) non-residents were excluded. The majority were male (551, 90.3%) and the rest were female (59, 9.7%). The mean age of the whole sample was 34.4±8.3 years old. The majority of drug users received junior high school or below education (564, 92.5%) and unmarried (385, 63.1%). The three subgroups of drug users include heroin-only users (295, 48.4%), poly-drug users (277, 45.4%) and SD-only users (38, 6.2%). Poly-drug users (33.8±7.8 years) and heroin-only users (35.1±8.3 years) were significantly older than SD-only users (29.1±7.2 years) (p=0.03). Of the three groups, poly-drug users had the highest daily drug injecting frequency (3.3±1.2 times/day), followed by heroin-only users (2.2±0.8 times/day) and SD-only users (1.2±0.4 times/day, p<0.01). The syringe sharing rate was lower in heroin-only users (107, 36.3%) than the poly-drug users (145, 52.3%) and SD-only users (21, 55.3%) (p<0.01). No significant differences are observed in gender distribution, married status and education levels among three groups (table 1).

Table 1

Key sociodemographic characteristics, drug-related practices, sexual activities following drug consumption and prevalence of confirmed HIV, HCV and syphilis infections among IDU in Southwest China

Estimated 33 (86.8%) participated SD-only users had sex in the previous month, in contrast, only 132 (44.7%) heroin-only users and 176 (63.5%) poly-drug users reported so. SD-only users had a higher rate of condomless sex in the previous month (18, 54.5%, p=0.01) compared with heroin-only users (47, 35.6%) and poly-drug users (34, 19.3%). Similarly, the proportion of SD-only users (29, 76.3%) who solicited commercial sex in the past 12 months was also higher than poly-drug users (165, 59.6%) and heroin-only users (103, 34.9%, p<0.01), and so was condomless rate during commercial sex (SD-only users (15, 51.7%), vs heroin-only users (39, 37.9%) and poly-drug users (56, 33.9%)) (p<0.05). However, no significant differences were found among three groups in the sexual behaviours with fixed partners (p>0.05). Specifically, 78. 8% (89) of heroin-only users, 76.6% (72) of poly-drug and 72.2% (13) of SD-only users had sex with fixed partners over the last 12 months. But condomless sex rate during the sexual activities with fixed/regular partners was the highest in SD-only users (12, 92.3%), compared with heroin-only users (67, 75.3%) and poly-drug users (66, 91.7%, p<0.01).

HCV, HIV and syphilis infections positivity rates were substantially different between the three groups. HCV positivity was the highest in heroin-only users (210, 71.2%), followed by poly-drug users (183, 66.1%) and the lowest among SD-only users (15, 39.5%, p<0.01). In contrast, HIV infection was the highest among poly-drug users (37, 13.4%, p=0.02) and then heroin-only users (27, 9.2%), but no HIV cases were found in SD-only users. Notably, syphilis positivity was the highest among SD-only users (3, 7.9%, p<0.01), compared with poly-drug users (6, 2.2%) and heroin-only users (4, 1.3%) (table 1).

The multivariable linear regression model demonstrated that in both the heroin-only users and poly-drug users. Higher frequency of daily drug injection was correlated with lower likelihood of having had sex or condomless sex (figure 1A,B). Among heroin-only users, every additional injection per day was associated with a 4.6% reduction in sex activities (p<0.01) and a 7.3% reduction condomless sex in the previous month (p<0.01). The likelihood of sex in the past month decreased sharply from the peak 53.3% to 30.0%, and condomless sex rate decreased from the peak 37.5% to 0% when the injection frequencies rose from one to six or more injections a day (figure 1A). There was also an 11.5% reduction in the reported rate of condomless commercial sex in the past 12 months for every additional injection (p<0.01) (figure 1A). Regarding the poly-drug users, ceiling effects were reached earlier with two or more daily injections, being associated with reduced sex activities in the previous month (decreased from the peak 69.0% to 35.7%, p<0.01) and commercial sex in the previous 12 months (decreased from the peak 64.0% to 42.9%, p<0.01, figure 1B). The frequency of daily injection and the rate of sex with fixed partners also showed a negative relationship, namely, every extra daily injection reduced 10.4% likelihood of having sex with a fixed partner (p<0.01). In contrast to other two groups, no significant reduction in any sexual practices in the previous 1 or 12 months was seen with more frequent drug injecting among SD-only users (figure 1C).

Figure 1

The relationship between sexual practices in the previous 1 month, previous 12 months and different drug administration patterns among heroin-only (A), poly-drug (B) and SDs-only (C) users in Southwest China. IDU, injection drug user; SD, synthetic drug.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in China to demonstrate strong associations between daily injection frequencies and sexual behaviours and patterns of recreational drug use. The findings suggest heroin use is related to reduce sexual risk, and SD use is associated with higher sexual risk. Furthermore for those who use heroin (alone or with SDs), increased daily injection frequencies were associated with decreases in both sexual activities and condomless sex over both short term and long term. Conversely, increased drug injecting frequency among SD-only users was not associated with reductions in sexual risk.

Several explanations for the above-mentioned results related to drug consumption and sexual behaviours are likely connected to the effects of dosage. For heroin-only users, it has been documented that high doses of heroin suppress libido and increase the likelihood of erectile dysfunction,25–28 leading to reduced sexual activity after drug consumption. In contrast, common SDs (eg, methamphetamine) are stimulants. Only a few studies have linked SDs with erectile dysfunction with no clear indication of a potential threshold that could reverse ‘stimulating effect’.29–31 Although this study did not examine whether the motivation for SD use was to facilitate sex, the role of SDs in sexual activity is more complicated than that of heroin and may drive users to have sex. This might explain the consistently high frequency of sexual activity observed among SD-only users. There has been evidence of orally ingested cocaine at 0 mg (placebo group), 125 mg and 250 mg once a day leading to increased sexual desire that was linear to drug dosage.32 However, in our study, intravenous injection of SDs from one to four times (approximately 100 mg each injection) per day did not show linear effects on sexual arousal. The difference may be due to the SDs participants in our study are all IDU and have developed serious drug dependence. It is possible that once these people reach the peak of drug-induced effects, further increases in drug injection frequency may have no additional impact on their sexual practices.33 The finding is consistent with previous results that reported that injecting SDs raises the likelihood of sexual impulsivity.34 Thus, we cannot determine a clear dose effect in the result.

We found that condom use depends on the dose and type of drug. It is well documented that a positive association exists between the SDs including crystal methamphetamine, ketamine, and ecstasy and high-risk sexual practices such as condomless sex, both in China and globally.35–38 Conversely, our study demonstrated that a declining rate of condomless sex was associated with increases in drug injecting frequency among poly-drug users and heroin-only users but not in SD-only users. Interestingly, an existing literature on cocaine effects demonstrated that under ideal circumstances where condoms are always available, condomless sex does not associate with cocaine use, which is in contrast to case group who lacked immediate access to condoms.32 The latter demonstrates a trend of reduced condom use following the consumption of cocaine with dose–response effects. These results highlight the critical role of condom availability for drug users.

Regarding HCV, HIV and syphilis infections prevalence, SD-only group had the highest syphilis positivity rate, the heroin-only group had the highest HCV positivity rate and mixed user group had the highest HIV infection rate. This partly reflects the divergence of HIV, HCV and STI epidemics and chronological impacts on different priority populations in China. Heroin-only users had the lowest syringe sharing rate within the past 12 months among three groups in our study. However, the higher prevalence of HCV may be due to accumulative risk of infection from a longer duration of injecting drug use. As heroin has been available for more than three decades, SD has only become popular among Chinese youth last 5 years.4 14 It concurs that the mean age of heroin users was significantly greater than the SD users in our study. Moreover, HCV prevalence rates in China among the general population have been estimated to be approximately 3.2%,39 which is higher than neighbour countries including India40 and another developed country,41 this high background prevalence of HCV may contribute to HCV transmission among long-term heroin-only users as well. Thus, for the younger Chinese generation, who may have a relatively shorter drug use (or mix-use) history of SD, HCV, HIV and syphilis infections prevention should be the foremost priority. Some effective interventions for previous drug harm reduction could be implemented on a wide scale, for example, Needle and Syringe Exchange Programmes, originally targeting heroin users,42 should be extended to SD users to prevent bloodborne disease transmission.43 Also, proactive intervention strategies need to be put in place in response to the imminent transition from non-injection to injection routes, as seen in other countries,44 45 which is expected to further increase HCV, HIV and syphilis infections burden.

Several limitations of this study should be noted. First, except for laboratory results, participants engaged in self-reporting of drug use and sexual behaviours; therefore, recall bias may exist. Second, the number of respondents who only injected SDs was small as the injection rate was lower in SD-only users compared with heroin-only users and poly-drug users, which may reduce the statistical power of the analysis. However, as no previous studies have reported on the injection of SDs in China, the data in this study can serve as the basis for further research. Additionally, the finding should be considered alarming and drive the implementation of suitable interventions for this population, as drug injection behaviour is estimated to be increasing among SD-only users.46 Third, for the poly-drug user group, where respondents only reported the injection of both heroin and SDs, we could not ascertain whether drugs were consumed concurrently in one dose or through a sequence of different injections. Fourth, the proportion of female drug users (9.7% of total drug users) in this study was much smaller than that of male drug users, meaning this might not have been a representative sample from which to generalise drug use among females. Fifth, we did not identify the type of sexual behaviours and gender of sexual partners in the survey. As drug facilitating sex is more likely to occur among homosexuals than heterosexuals, sexual orientation may have an impact on the aim of drug use and subsequent sexual behaviours.47 48 Despite this, our study shows the first attempt to explore the drug injection frequency effects on sexual behaviours. These findings are not limited to contributing to the harm reduction of drug consumption in China, but they also add evidence for easing the HCV, HIV and syphilis infections burden brought by drug use in other countries. As rampant recreational drugs consumption is common worldwide, the issue needs a global corporation to eliminate the negative influences.

Conclusions

This study underscores that sexual activities including condom use are subject to the type of drugs used and dosage between IDU. Elevated risk of unsafe sexual behaviours has been established among a generation of SD injection users. HCV, HIV and syphilis infections prevention and treatment programmes targeting priority subgroups of IDU in China should be promoted.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
  27. 27.
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
  31. 31.
  32. 32.
  33. 33.
  34. 34.
  35. 35.
  36. 36.
  37. 37.
  38. 38.
  39. 39.
  40. 40.
  41. 41.
  42. 42.
  43. 43.
  44. 44.
  45. 45.
  46. 46.
  47. 47.
  48. 48.
View Abstract

Footnotes

  • LZ and FC contributed equally.

  • Contributors LZ, FC and LM conceived and designed the study. ShuL, JZ, ShiL and LC collected and cleaned the data. SS, LZ and LM analysed the data. SS wrote the paper. ShiL, JJ, CKF, LM and LZ revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.

  • Funding This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Ethics approval The study was approved by the Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee (CF16/942 - 2016000495).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement Due to privacy and ethical concerns, supporting data cannot be made openly available. Please contact the authors for access to the original data.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.