Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Effect of multimorbidity on survival of patients diagnosed with heart failure: a retrospective cohort study in Singapore
  1. Palvinder Kaur1,
  2. Nakul Saxena1,
  3. Alex Xiaobin You1,
  4. Raymond C C Wong2,
  5. Choon Pin Lim3,
  6. Seet Yoong Loh4,
  7. Pradeep Paul George1
  1. 1 Health Services and Outcomes Research, National Healthcare Group, Singapore
  2. 2 Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore, Singapore
  3. 3 Department of Cardiology, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore
  4. 4 Department of Cardiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
  1. Correspondence to Dr Pradeep Paul George; pradeep_paul_g_gunapal{at}nhg.com.sg

Abstract

Objective Multimorbidity in patients with heart failure (HF) results in poor prognosis and is an increasing public health concern. We aim to examine the effect of multimorbidity focusing on type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) on all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD)-specific mortality among patients diagnosed with HF in Singapore.

Design Retrospective cohort study.

Setting Primary and tertiary care in three (out of six) Regional Health Systems in Singapore.

Participants Patients diagnosed with HF between 2003 and 2016 from three restructured hospitals and nine primary care polyclinics were included in this retrospective cohort study.

Primary outcomes All-cause mortality and CVD-specific mortality.

Results A total of 34 460 patients diagnosed with HF from 2003 to 2016 were included in this study and were followed up until 31 December 2016. The median follow-up time was 2.1 years. Comorbidities prior to HF diagnosis were considered. Patients were categorised as (1) HF only, (2) T2DM+HF, (3) CKD+HF and (4) T2DM+CKD+HF. Cox regression model was used to determine the effect of multimorbidity on (1) all-cause mortality and (2) CVD-specific mortality. Adjusting for demographics, other comorbidities, baseline treatment and duration of T2DM prior to HF diagnosis, ‘T2DM+CKD+HF’ patients had a 56% higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.56, 95% CI 1.48 to 1.63) and a 44% higher risk of CVD-specific mortality (HR: 1.44, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.56) compared with patients diagnosed with HF only.

Conclusion All-cause and CVD-specific mortality risks increased with increasing multimorbidity. This study highlights the need for a new model of care that focuses on holistic patient management rather than disease management alone to improve survival among patients with HF with multimorbidity.

  • multi-morbidity
  • heart failure
  • diabetes
  • chronic kidney disease
  • mortality
  • Singapore

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Strengths and limitations of this study

  • This is the first study in Singapore that assessed a large proportion of patients with heart failure (HF) and the effect of multimorbidity on mortality among these patients.

  • Due to the increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the community and their strong link to HF, patients were categorised into four groups based on history of CKD (stages 1–5) and T2DM prior to HF diagnosis.

  • Longitudinal follow-up and linked data with several databases provided accurate estimates of the survival probabilities for patients with HF.

  • Due to the administrative nature of the database, only routinely collected variables were used and hence certain clinical parameters that were not captured could not be analysed.

  • Data were limited to patients who sought care at any of the central healthcare institutions captured by the Regional Health System database.

Introduction   

With an ageing population and increased exposure to environmental risk factors, the likelihood of accumulating multiple chronic conditions has increased.1 2 Multimorbidity, defined as the coexistence of two or more chronic conditions, is an emerging epidemic in ageing populations around the world.3 Empirical data from 17 international studies reported the prevalence of multimorbidity of individuals aged ≥75 years old to range from 13% to 83%.2 In Singapore, 51.5% of the elderly, aged 60 years and above, were found to have two or more chronic conditions.4

Heart failure (HF) is highly prevalent among older adults and carries a very high burden of comorbidities.5–8 The lifetime risk of developing HF is one in five at the age of 40 years9. In the USA, an estimated 6.5 million adults have HF, with 960 000 incident cases annually.9 This HF pandemic is also evident in Asia. Reports published in East Asian countries, including Singapore, found that the prevalence of HF ranged from 1.3% to 6.7%, with prevalence increasing with age.7 8 A 2017 systematic review aimed to assess the magnitude and impact of multimorbidity on clinical outcomes in older adults with cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in mostly Western and European cohorts.6 In terms of the magnitude of multimorbidity, the prevalence of having an additional comorbidity occurred in 10%–77% of persons, while the proportion of persons having four or more additional comorbidities ranged from 5% to 60%.6 Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), chronic kidney disease (CKD), anaemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and dementia/cognitive impairment were the most common comorbidities reported in these studies. While numerous studies have focused on the effects of individual comorbidities, few studies have examined the impact of multiple comorbidities on mortality in patients with HF.5 6 10–12 A positive association was seen in the cumulative effect of comorbidities and risk of dying. Multimorbidity in patients with HF is of public health concern as these patients have adverse health outcomes, greater healthcare utilisation, decreased quality of life, increased polypharmacy and increased risk of mortality.1 2 10 11 13–19

T2DM and CKD are established risk factors for CVD and are significantly associated with increased mortality.19–25 Among patients with chronic HF in Western populations, the prevalence of T2DM was approximately 25%, while the prevalence of CKD was found to be at 50%.26 27 This triad of CVD, T2DM and CKD often coexist, has significant impact on mortality and are key comorbidities associated with an ageing population.19–21 28 These diseases share many similar risk factors, such as older age, obesity, physical inactivity, dyslipidaemia and hypertension.19–21 29 There is limited evidence on the effect of these comorbidities on the risk of mortality in patients with HF in Singapore. This study aims to determine the effect of multimorbidity, focusing on T2DM and CKD, on (1) all-cause and (2) CVD-specific mortality among patients diagnosed with HF in Singapore.

Methods

Study population

Patients diagnosed with HF between 2003 and 2016 from three restructured hospitals and nine primary care polyclinics were included in this retrospective cohort study and followed up until death or censor date (31 December 2016). Patient demographics and clinical and death data were obtained from the Regional Health System (RHS) administrative database. A detailed report about the set-up of this database can be found in previous publications.30 31 Briefly, the RHS database is a conglomeration of four isolated databases from three RHS in the central region of Singapore. It contains linked National Healthcare Group polyclinic visit records from nine National Healthcare Group Polyclinics, specialist outpatient clinic visit records, hospital discharge records from three restructured hospitals, chronic disease management system records and mortality records obtained from the national registry.30 31

Comorbidities such as T2DM and CKD prior to HF diagnosis were considered. The effects of individual comorbidity and the combined effects of comorbidities were examined. Patients were categorised based on history of CKD (stages 1–5) and T2DM prior to HF diagnosis. To obtain a reference group of patients with HF only, patients diagnosed with T2DM and/or CKD after HF was diagnosed were excluded. Patients were categorised as follows:

  1. HF patients only (reference group).

  2. History of T2DM+HF.

  3. History of CKD+HF.

  4. History of T2DM+history of CKD+HF.

Outcomes

The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoint was a CVD-specific mortality that included death from a cardiovascular cause, such as myocardial infarction, HF and peripheral vascular disease.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive analysis was used to report baseline characteristics of the four categories of patients. Data were reported as mean±SD for continuous variables and column percentages for categorical variables. Baseline characteristics were compared between the patient categories using the parametric one-way analysis of variance for continuous variables and χ2 test for categorical variables. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate survival time between patient categories for all-cause and CVD-specific mortality. Cox regression was used to determine independent effects of comorbidity as well as the combined effects of comorbidities on risk of all-cause and CVD-specific mortality. Variables included in the model were age, gender, ethnicity, smoking status, history of atrial fibrillation, COPD, dyslipidaemia, hypertension and stroke, baseline medication such as ACE inhibitors (ACEi), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), beta-blockers and diuretics, and duration of T2DM prior to HF diagnosis. All statistical tests were two-sided and a p value of smaller than 0.05 was considered significant for inclusion into the final multivariate model.

Years of potential life lost (YPLL) were estimated for patients in the four strata. YPLL provides an estimate of the average time a person would have lived if he or she had not died prematurely. YPLL was calculated by averaging the difference between the life expectancy based on the 2015 Singapore life tables and age at death for each patient in the four categories.32

All analyses were conducted using STATA V.15.0 statistical software.

Patient and public involvement

There was no patient and public involvement as this was a database research study.

Results

Patient demographics

Patients diagnosed with HF from 2003 to 2016 were included in the analysis (n=34 460). The median follow-up was 2.1 years (IQR: 0.5–4.9 years). The mean age of these patients was 70.2 years (SD 14.0 years) and 46.6% were female. Prior to HF diagnosis, 50.5% had T2DM and 41.1% had CKD. The prevalences of other comorbidities were as follows: dyslipidaemia, 63.3%; hypertension, 63.1%; stroke, 14.5%; atrial fibrillation, 10.6%; and COPD, 4.8%. A third of the patients in this cohort were non-smokers (30.7%), while 14.7% were reported to be current smokers. Ex-smokers and patients whose smoking status was unknown made up the remaining proportion. Beta-blockers were the most commonly prescribed to this cohort (29.8%), followed by ACEi (21.2%), diuretics (18.6%) and ARB (11.2%).

Table 1 details the baseline characteristics of patients categorised according to their multimorbidity status. A total of 12 880 patients were diagnosed with HF only (37.4%), 7430 (21.6%) had T2DM+HF, 4186 (12.1%) had CKD+HF and 9964 (28.9%) patients had T2DM+CKD+HF. CKD+HF patients were significantly older as compared with patients in the other three groups (table 1). T2DM+CKD+HF patients had higher prevalence of hypertension, dyslipidaemia and stroke as compared with other patients in this study (table 1). Nearly half of T2DM+CKD+HF patients were on beta-blockers, while 34% were on ACEi.

Table 1

Baseline demographics by combinations of comorbidities in patients with HF

The average YPLL for a T2DM+HF patient was 14.2 years (SD 8.9 years), while the average YPLL for a CKD+HF patient was 9.3 years (SD 7.6 years) (table 1). As patients with CKD+HF were significantly older than the other patients in this study, their YPLL was expected to be shorter.

Mortality outcomes

During the study period, there were 19 083 (55.4%) deaths, of which 8094 (23.5%) were CVD-specific. As compared with other patient groups in the study, a higher proportion of CKD+HF patients (60.2%) had died from an all-cause event (table 1). Interestingly, the proportion of patients experiencing a non-CVD-specific death was much higher than CVD-specific death across all four patient strata (table 1). CKD+HF patients had the highest proportion of non-CVD deaths (37%), while only 28.6% of HF patients had a non-CVD-specific death (table 1).

Adjusting for demographics, other comorbidities, baseline treatment and duration of T2DM prior to HF diagnosis, the independent effects of T2DM and CKD showed a 21% (HR: 1.21, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.26) and 29% (HR: 1.29, 95% CI 1.25 to 1.34) higher risk of all-cause death as compared with patients with HF without these conditions (table 2). Likewise, the risk of CVD-specific death for T2DM and CKD was 21% (HR: 1.21, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.28) and 19% (HR: 1.19, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.26) higher than patients with HF without these conditions (table 2).

Table 2

Independent effect of diabetes and CKD on all-cause and CVD-specific mortality

Comorbidity was associated with a significantly increased risk of death among patients with increased level of comorbidities for both outcomes—all-cause mortality (figure 1) and CVD-specific death (figure 2). Adjusting for the same variables, the median survival to all-cause mortality for HF only, T2DM+HF, CKD+HF and T2DM+CKD+HF patients was 5.5, 4.6, 4.4 and 2.9 years, respectively. Having all three conditions (T2DM+CKD+HF) was associated with a 56% (adjusted HR: 1.56, 95% CI 1.48 to 1.63) higher risk of all-cause death and 44% (adjusted HR: 1.44, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.56) higher risk from CVD-specific death compared with HF patients only (table 3) after adjustment of the specified confounders.

Figure 1

Kaplan-Meier survival plots for ‘all-cause mortality’ according to level of multimorbidity in patients with HF. CKD, chronic kidney disease; HF, heart failure; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Figure 2

Kaplan-Meier survival plots for ‘CVD-specific mortality’ according to level of multimorbidity in patients with HF. CKD, chronic kidney disease; CVD, cardiovascular disease; HF, heart failure; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Table 3

Effect of multimorbidity on all-cause and CVD-specific mortality

Discussion

This study evaluated the effect of multimorbidity on survival of patients diagnosed with HF in Singapore. More than 40% of patients either had CKD, T2DM or both prior to developing HF. Findings from this study showed that presence of comorbidities among patients with HF increased the risk of all-cause mortality by 15%–56% and CVD-specific mortality by 17%–44%.

The results from this study are in agreement with the findings from other published studies that assessed the effects of multimorbidity in patients diagnosed with CVD on risk of mortality. The European Heart Failure Pilot Survey consisting of 3226 outpatients with chronic HF reported that patients with three or more comorbidities had 9.3 times higher risk of death compared with patients with HF with no comorbidities.10 In the same study, individual effects of CKD (adjusted HR: 1.5, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.1), anaemia (adjusted HR: 1.7, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.4) and T2DM (adjusted HR: 1.7, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.4) conferred the highest risk on all-cause mortality. A cohort study of patients with CVD in the UK reported that patients diagnosed with T2DM and CKD had 4.7 times higher all-cause mortality risk and 2.7 times higher CVD-specific mortality risk as compared with patients diagnosed with HF only.33 This current study also showed that the presence of one or more comorbidities in patients with HF had a pronounced effect on all-cause mortality as compared with CVD-specific mortality.

Similar pathophysiology or risk factors shared by various comorbidities may increase the risk of mortality either by interacting with or aggravating the progression of HF.19–21 29 The interaction between T2DM, CKD and HF is a complex process—(1) they share common risk factors such as hypertension, dyslipidaemia, serum cholesterol and obesity; (2) the bidirectional pathophysiological and clinical effects of one disease can impact the other; and (3) pharmacological therapy for one disease may result in the development of the other, thus causing a clinical conundrum.19–21 34–36 Poor glycaemic control is associated with increased risk of HF. With every 1% increase in glycosylated haemoglobin levels, there is an 8% increased risk of HF.37 T2DM increases risk of HF through a combination of pathophysiological abnormalities.38 T2DM alters the myocardial glucose metabolism, cardiac fatty acid metabolism and intracellular cycling.38 It also causes coronary artery disease, microvascular dysfunction and neurohormonal upregulation, and increases cardiac fibrosis.38 Clinical studies have also shown that HF is an insulin-resistant state and could be responsible for the increased incidence of diabetes mellitus in this group of patients.38–41 Factors such as HF disease severity, decreased functional exercise capacity and increased B-type natriuretic peptide were found to be associated with greater insulin resistance.40 41 Furthermore, pharmacological treatments for HF such as diuretics and beta-blockers have been shown to be associated with an increase in incident T2DM.38 40 41

Renal dysfunction and HF share similar underlying comorbidities such as hypertension, T2DM and coronary arterial disease, and similar pathogenic mechanisms such as neurohormonal and inflammatory activation.20 21 The bidirectional relationship of the heart–kidney interaction is termed as the cardiorenal syndrome, whereby the acute chronic dysfunction of one organ may induce an acute chronic dysfunction in the other.34 38 42 While HF has shown to be a predictor of renal dysfunction, patients with CKD were reported to have up to 68% higher risk of developing HF as compared with patients without CKD.34 Decreased cardiac output, increased central venous pressure, several neurohormonal pathways such as the the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) and HF therapies contribute to renal dysfunction in patients with HF.34 38 HF therapies such as ACEi and ARB can affect renal function by decreasing the glomerular filtration rate through intrarenal mechanisms.35 Further research on the pathophysiological pathways for this triad of diseases may provide better understanding on how these comorbidities interact, as well as provide potential treatment targets to treat these diseases without impacting on the other.

Currently, there is no gold standard in assessing and characterising the burden of multimorbidity. Several approaches exist to measure multimorbidity, such as counting comorbidities, using comorbidity indices such as the Charlson Comorbidity Index or by grouping specific comorbidities together.6 43 The ease of using disease counts makes them the most common approach to define multimorbidity. However, they do not account for the clinical severity of the various comorbid conditions or the underlying pathophysiology. Comorbidity indices provide a multimorbidity score by assigning weights to a range of diseases based on clinical severity. Although clinical severity is considered, summary scores lack the ability to adequately characterise the complexity of multimorbidity in patients with HF. Furthermore, such scores are challenging to apply and integrate in the clinical management of patients with HF.

As older patients with HF are more likely to have multiple comorbidities that influence prognosis, this study aimed to assess the combined prognostic effects of the selected comorbidities. Additional comorbidities and geriatric conditions beyond the scope of this study may contribute to poor prognosis of multimorbid patients with HF in Singapore; however T2DM and CKD were focused on mainly due to their increasing prevalence in the community and their strong link to HF. The major strength of this study is the large sample size and that the patients are reflective of a ‘real-world setting’. Such complex patients, who would generally be excluded from clinical trials, are increasingly being seen in healthcare systems around the world and are being treated by general practitioners, geriatricians, cardiologists and other healthcare providers. Furthermore, the RHS database allowed for longitudinal tracking of patients captured in the system over time, thus providing accurate estimates of the survival probabilities of patients with HF with multimorbidity.

This study is not without limitations. Due to the administrative nature of the RHS database, data availability is limited to routinely captured administrative data. Patients may have been diagnosed with a disease prior to clinic presentation at one of the RHS healthcare providers. Likewise, treatment data might be under-represented in our database due to limited data availability. Other potential risk factors that could have influenced the results such as social, functional and cognitive factors, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and previous coronary revascularisation procedures were not captured in this system and therefore not included in the Cox regression model as potential confounders.12 16 20 The database is limited to patients who sought treatment at any of the RHS healthcare providers in the central region of Singapore. Data on patients who sought care outside of this catchment area will not be captured by the database.

Multimorbidity poses numerous healthcare management challenges for patients diagnosed with HF. The accumulation of chronic conditions contributes to poorer prognosis, unnecessary healthcare utilisation, complex medical treatments, duplicative tests, fragmented care and competing priorities, which may impact overall care and outcomes of patients. Current clinical guidelines address the management of a single disease.44 Findings from this study support the need for a new model of care that focuses on holistic patient management rather than disease management alone to improve survival among patients with HF with multimorbidity. A systematic framework to support active management of HF and other concurrent comorbidities is urgently required. Key strategies that could potentially improve health outcomes in the management of multimorbid patients with HF include (1) acknowledging multimorbidity in HF as a clinical syndrome with poor prognosis, (2) determining the nature and extent of multimorbidity through routine clinical assessment, (3) identifying clinical priorities and appropriate care plans using a multidisciplinary team approach that includes patients and caregivers, (4) enhancing standard HF management guidelines to foster a patient-centred, multidisciplinary, case management strategy, and (5) evaluating the success of HF management that includes acute hospitalisation indicators as well as health-related indicators from the patient’s perspectives such as the patient’s goals and other patient-reported outcomes.45

Conclusion

The combined effects of T2DM and CKD resulted in the highest risk of mortality in patients with HF. The prevalence of HF, diabetes and CKD will continue to rise with the ageing population in Singapore. Optimal management of HF along with its associated multimorbidity is essential to improve survival. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies are therefore required to prevent the development of these illnesses and reduce the combined effects of these diseases on morbidity and mortality in the population.

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to the staff of the Department of Health Services and Outcomes Research, National Healthcare Group, Singapore, for their contributions in providing the data and valuable inputs to this study.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
  27. 27.
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
  31. 31.
  32. 32.
  33. 33.
  34. 34.
  35. 35.
  36. 36.
  37. 37.
  38. 38.
  39. 39.
  40. 40.
  41. 41.
  42. 42.
  43. 43.
  44. 44.
  45. 45.
View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Contributors NS and PPG designed the study. PK conducted the data analysis and wrote the manuscript, with inputs from NS, PPG, LCP, RCCW and LSY. AXY provided biostatistics expertise and helped with data extraction from the database. RCCW, LCP and LSY provided clinical inputs for the study. All authors read and amended the manuscript, and all authors vetted the final version of the manuscript.

  • Funding This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Ethics approval This study has been approved by the National Healthcare Group Domain Specific Review Board (NHG DSRB).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement No additional data available.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.