Responses

Download PDFPDF

What is the effect of secondary (high) schooling on subsequent medical school performance? A national, UK-based, cohort study
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Authors' response to: "UK medical schools are not academically equal"
    • Paul A Tiffin, Reader in Psychometric Epidemiology/Honorary Consultant Psychiatrist University of York

    We agree that variation exists across UK medical schools as highlighted by the cited paper by McManus et al. (2008). It was partly this that we had in mind when we state, in the limitation section of our discussion:

    “In terms of the outcome measures, the categorisation of undergraduate examinations into skills and knowledge was not operationalised and therefore rely on the participating medical schools to categorise the evaluations. Thus, their definition may vary across medical schools. While some of this variation was handled by the use of multilevel modelling, a more robust definition of undergraduate ‘skills’-based assessments may have been helpful in predicting clinically orientated performance, which may have been a more faithful proxy for later medical practice. In this regard, a methodology has been proposed to achieve this through the ‘nationalisation’ of ‘local’ measures of undergraduate medical school performance for fair comparisons of graduating medical doctors.” [page 10, paragraph 3].

    Indeed, we recognise the use of ‘local educational measures’ as a particular challenge in UK-based Medical Education Research and are shortly to evaluate whether our approach to adjusting for this using ‘Peer Competition Rescaling’ (applied in the report by Tiffin & Paton, 2017) is valid in these circumstances. Thus, it is true to state that at present we cannot rule out the potential selection effect that Dr Banerjee highlights as a possibility. Only emerging...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    UK medical schools are not academically equal
    • Anjan K Banerjee, Hon. Consultant Colorectal Surgeon Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth

    Whilst the study addresses an important problem there appears to be no correction for the relative competitiveness within different UK medical schools. Whilst all UK medical schools meet high international standards and meet stringent GMC criteria for approval, there are differences in the academic rigour between medical courses, and also the academic standards achieved, demonstrated by the speed and success rate of acquisition of skills and knowledge based higher qualifications such as MRCP [ McManus et al., 2008]. If the lower performing students at A level gravitate towards the lower academically schools, they may be placed higher in ranking of skills based assessment in those medical schools. Paradoxically the higher performing grade students , by getting places in the most academically rigorous schools ( such as Oxford and Cambridge), might sit lower in the academic rankings of their respective medical school. An alternative hypothesis would be that state school students with weaker A levels are more likely to attend less academically competitive medical schools, where individually they will be higher in the skills ranking. It would be more meaningful if the A level correlations were extended to success rates in a common medical qualifying exam and postgraduate qualifications, prior to changing medical school selection policy.

    References

    McManus IC, Elder AT, Champlain A, Dacre JE, Mollon J , Chis L
    Graduates of different UK medical schools sh...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.