Research priorities in health communication and participation: international survey of consumers and other stakeholders
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Research priorities and hearing loss
    • Anneliese Synnot, Phd Researcher and Research Fellow Centre for Health Communication and Participation, La Trobe University
    • Other Contributors:
      • Sophie Hill, Senior Research Fellow and Centre Head
      • Allison Tong, Associate Professor

    Thank you for highlighting the health communication challenges that can be experienced by people with hearing loss, and the importance of training for health professionals to improve this. One of the things participants consistently told us during this project is that anyone can be vulnerable to experiencing poor health communication and participation, but individuals and groups with certain health or social characteristics may be more likely to experience this. The list of characteristics participants described was extensive, but not exhaustive, given it did not include people with hearing loss. We agree (and so did the participants in our study) that research into interventions aimed at improving health professionals’ (and health services’) health communication practices is the way forward so that everyone can participate in their care.

    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Hearing Loss and Healthcare
    • Kathi A. Mestayer, Freelance writer and active volunteer on Boards, etc. (see Contents) See article.

    Although hearing loss is referred to in this study, it is mostly between-the-lines (as a disability?). Given the statistics, it is probably the condition that affects effective communication for more patients/caregivers than any other. It can have significant impacts on outcomes (like when my uncle heard "colostomy" instead of "colonoscopy", and refused the procedure for two days until someone thought to write it down for him). I have many other examples, and have given presentations to RNs in the clinical phase of their training. If you are interested in pursuing hearing loss in healthcare settings, I'd be happy to participate. One problem is that mis-hearings often go unnoticed, and so might be under-reported in a survey. Thanks for doing this; much-needed.

    Kathi A. Mestayer
    Staff Writer, Hearing Health Magazine
    Advisory Board, Va Department for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing
    Advisory Committee, Hearing Loss Association of America Greater Richmond Chapter
    N-CHATT (Hearing Assistive Technology) Trainer, HLAA/Gallaudet

    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.