Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Using machine learning techniques to develop forecasting algorithms for postoperative complications: protocol for a retrospective study
  1. Bradley A Fritz1,
  2. Yixin Chen2,
  3. Teresa M Murray-Torres1,
  4. Stephen Gregory1,
  5. Arbi Ben Abdallah1,
  6. Alex Kronzer1,
  7. Sherry Lynn McKinnon1,
  8. Thaddeus Budelier1,
  9. Daniel L Helsten1,
  10. Troy S Wildes1,
  11. Anshuman Sharma1,
  12. Michael Simon Avidan1
  1. 1 Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
  2. 2 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Bradley A Fritz; bafritz{at}wustl.edu

Abstract

Introduction Mortality and morbidity following surgery are pressing public health concerns in the USA. Traditional prediction models for postoperative adverse outcomes demonstrate good discrimination at the population level, but the ability to forecast an individual patient’s trajectory in real time remains poor. We propose to apply machine learning techniques to perioperative time-series data to develop algorithms for predicting adverse perioperative outcomes.

Methods and analysis This study will include all adult patients who had surgery at our tertiary care hospital over a 4-year period. Patient history, laboratory values, minute-by-minute intraoperative vital signs and medications administered will be extracted from the electronic medical record. Outcomes will include in-hospital mortality, postoperative acute kidney injury and postoperative respiratory failure. Forecasting algorithms for each of these outcomes will be constructed using density-based logistic regression after employing a Nadaraya-Watson kernel density estimator. Time-series variables will be analysed using first and second-order feature extraction, shapelet methods and convolutional neural networks. The algorithms will be validated through measurement of precision and recall.

Ethics and dissemination This study has been approved by the Human Research Protection Office at Washington University in St Louis. The successful development of these forecasting algorithms will allow perioperative healthcare clinicians to predict more accurately an individual patient’s risk for specific adverse perioperative outcomes in real time. Knowledge of a patient’s dynamic risk profile may allow clinicians to make targeted changes in the care plan that will alter the patient’s outcome trajectory. This hypothesis will be tested in a future randomised controlled trial.

  • adult anaesthesia
  • information technology
  • health informatics

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors BAF contributed to overall study design, initial draft of protocol and critical revision of protocol. YC contributed to development of methods for creation of forecasting algorithms. TMM-T, SHG, AK, SLM, TSW, AS and MSA contributed to study design and critical revision of protocol. TB and DLH contributed to critical revision of protocol. ABA contributed to statistical methods for validation of forecasting algorithms and to critical revision of protocol.

  • Funding This work will be funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation (award number 1622678) and from a grant from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R21 HS24581-01).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Ethics approval Human Research Protection Office, Washington University in St Louis.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.