You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 8, Issue 4
  • Effectiveness of implementing a best practice primary healthcare model for low back pain (BetterBack) compared with current routine care in the Swedish context: an internal pilot study informed protocol for an effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 2 t…

Article info

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

XML
Evidence based practice
Protocol
Effectiveness of implementing a best practice primary healthcare model for low back pain (BetterBack) compared with current routine care in the Swedish context: an internal pilot study informed protocol for an effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 2 trial

Authors

  • Allan Abbott Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Karin Schröder Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Paul Enthoven Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Per Nilsen Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Birgitta Öberg Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  1. Correspondence to Dr Allan Abbott; allan.abbott{at}liu.se
View Full Text

Citation

Abbott A, Schröder K, Enthoven P, et al
Effectiveness of implementing a best practice primary healthcare model for low back pain (BetterBack) compared with current routine care in the Swedish context: an internal pilot study informed protocol for an effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 2 trial
BMJ Open 2018;8:e019906. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019906

Publication history

  • Received October 2, 2017
  • Revised February 28, 2018
  • Accepted March 5, 2018
  • First published April 24, 2018.
Online issue publication 
January 24, 2022
Previous versions
Review history

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Copyright information

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/