Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Nursing workload, patient safety incidents and mortality: an observational study from Finland
  1. Lisbeth Fagerström1,2,
  2. Marina Kinnunen3,
  3. Jan Saarela1
  1. 1 Faculty of Education and Welfare Studies, Åbo Akademi University, Vaasa, Finland
  2. 2 Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University College of Southeast Norway, Drammen, Norway
  3. 3 Vaasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland
  1. Correspondence to Professor Lisbeth Fagerström; lisbeth.fagerstrom{at}abo.fi

Abstract

Objective To investigate whether the daily workload per nurse (Oulu Patient Classification (OPCq)/nurse) as measured by the RAFAELA system correlates with different types of patient safety incidents and with patient mortality, and to compare the results with regressions based on the standard patients/nurse measure.

Setting We obtained data from 36 units from four Finnish hospitals. One was a tertiary acute care hospital, and the three others were secondary acute care hospitals.

Participants Patients’ nursing intensity (249 123 classifications), nursing resources, patient safety incidents and patient mortality were collected on a daily basis during 1 year, corresponding to 12 475 data points. Associations between OPC/nurse and patient safety incidents or mortality were estimated using unadjusted logistic regression models, and models that adjusted for ward-specific effects, and effects of day of the week, holiday and season.

Primary and secondary outcome measures Main outcome measures were patient safety incidents and death of a patient.

Results When OPC/nurse was above the assumed optimal level, the adjusted odds for a patient safety incident were 1.24 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.42) that of the assumed optimal level, and 0.79 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.93) if it was below the assumed optimal level. Corresponding estimates for patient mortality were 1.43 (95% CI 1.18 to 1.73) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.60 to 1.00), respectively. As compared with the patients/nurse classification, models estimated on basis of the RAFAELA classification system generally provided larger effect sizes, greater statistical power and better model fit, although the difference was not very large. Net benefits as calculated on the basis of decision analysis did not provide any clear evidence on which measure to prefer.

Conclusions We have demonstrated an association between daily workload per nurse and patient safety incidents and mortality. Current findings need to be replicated by future studies.

  • human resource management
  • risk management

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors LF did the literature search. LF and JS designed the study. LF collected the data. JS prepared the data and performed the analyses. LF, MK and JS contributed to data interpretation, writing and revision of the report.

  • Funding The authors disclose receipt of the following financial support for the research and authorship for this article: The State Research Funding of Vaasa Hospital District based on the Health Care Act (1326/2010).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Ethics approval This study received approval from the chief administrative physicians of all four hospitals involved. No further ethical approval was therefore necessary, which is in accordance with the regulatory regime for conducting health research in Finland.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement Full descriptions of all models estimated and their estimates are found in the supplementary electronic files.