Download PDFPDF

A cross-sectional study of all clinicians’ conflict of interest disclosures to NHS hospital employers in England 2015-2016
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Non-disclosure by physicans of payments from the pharmaceutical industry

    This is an interesting piece. Pharmaceutical companies have to publish payments made to individual, named physicians. (These are available at However, recipients can choose to remain unidentifiable (PMCPA Clause 24.9). In the figures for 2016, published in Disclosure UK in June 2017, 35% of health care professionals chose to remain incognito. In the GMC's Good Medical Practice they only recommend that physicians consider the PMCPA code. Perhaps they could be firmer in their recommendation.

    Conflict of Interest:
    My company advises pharmaceutical companies on scientific and ethical marketing of products.