You are here

Article info

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

XML
Medical publishing and peer review
Protocol
Editors’ perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study

Authors

  • Ketevan Glonti School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Split, Split, Croatia INSERM, U1153 Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center (CRESS), Methods of therapeutic evaluation of chronic diseases Team (METHODS), Paris Descartes University, Paris, France PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Darko Hren School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Split, Split, Croatia PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  1. Correspondence to Ketevan Glonti; kglonti{at}unist.hr
View Full Text

Citation

Glonti K, Hren D
Editors’ perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study
BMJ Open 2018;8:e020568. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020568

Publication history

  • Received November 9, 2017
  • Revised July 12, 2018
  • Accepted September 14, 2018
  • First published October 18, 2018.
Online issue publication 
October 18, 2018
Previous versions
Review history

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Copyright information

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.