Article Text
Abstract
Purpose REtard de Croissance Intra-uterin et PALudisme (RECIPAL) is an original preconceptional cohort designed to assess the consequences of malaria during the first trimester of pregnancy, which is a poorly investigated period in Africa and during which malaria may be detrimental to the fetus.
Participants For this purpose, a total of 1214 women of reproductive age living in Sô-Ava and Akassato districts (south Benin) were followed up monthly from June 2014 to December 2016 until 411 of them became pregnant. A large range of health determinants was collected both before and during pregnancy from the first weeks of gestation to delivery. Five Doppler ultrasound scans were performed for early dating of the pregnancy and longitudinal fetal growth assessment.
Findings to date Pregnant women were identified at a mean of 6.9 weeks of gestation (wg). Preliminary results confirmed the high prevalence of malaria in the first trimester of pregnancy, with more than 25.4% of women presenting at least one microscopic malarial infection during this period. Most infections occurred before six wg. The prevalence of low birth weight, small birth weight for gestational age (according to INTERGROWTH-21st charts) and preterm birth was 9.3%, 18.3% and 12.6%, respectively.
Future plans REtard de Croissance Intra-uterin et PALudisme (RECIPAL) represents at this time a unique resource that will provide information on multiple infectious (including malaria), biological, nutritional and environmental determinants in relation to health outcomes in women of reproductive age, pregnant women and their newborns. It will contribute to better define future recommendations for the prevention of malaria in early pregnancy and maternal malnutrition in Africa. It confirms that it is possible to constitute a preconceptional pregnancy cohort in Africa and provides valuable information for researchers starting cohorts in the future.
- longitudinal pre-conceptional cohort
- cohort profile
- malaria
- nutritional status
- fetal growth
- africa
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Strengths and limitations of this study
A unique cohort combining highly detailed, high-quality health-related information on the pregnancies of approximately 400 women recruited in the preconception period, with a substantial related biobank of plasmas, placental and other samples.
Preconceptional design allowing the early identification and follow-up of pregnant women: screening of women for both microscopic and submicroscopic malaria from the first weeks of pregnancy; accurate estimation of gestational age by using early obstetrical ultrasound scan and collection of some important factors influencing fetal growth such as prepregnancy nutritional status and gestational hypertensive disorders.
Collection of valuable information for the implementation of future preconceptional cohorts in Africa.
High attrition in the preconceptional cohort, with a possible impact on the external validity of some findings.
Reduced sample size at delivery due to a high proportion of spontaneous abortion, with a possible lack of power for analyses on birth outcomes.
Introduction
Malaria in pregnancy is associated with a wide range of deleterious effects in women and their offspring. In Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries, preventive strategies are based on long-lasting insecticide-treated bed nets (LLITNs) and intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp). IPTp consists in the administration of sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine (SP) at each antenatal care (ANC) visit from the second trimester of pregnancy onwards.1 LLITN are distributed at the first ANC visit, which generally occurs around 4–5 months of pregnancy.2 Therefore, pregnant women remain unprotected or insufficiently protected during the first months of pregnancy and particularly during the first trimester. However, this period may be a high-risk period for the fetus if pregnancy-associated malarial parasites accumulate into the placenta during trophoblast differentiation and vascular remodelling of the uterus.3 4 Impaired placentation may then contribute to fetal growth restriction and low birth weight (LBW).
Few studies have investigated malaria in early pregnancy, and while some have shown an adverse effect on birth outcomes, this has not been consistent.5 In Burkina Faso and in Benin, malarial infection in the first trimester6 or before 4 to 5 months of pregnancy7 8 has been associated with a higher risk of LBW or a decrease in birth weight. Conversely, such association was not reported in Uganda and Malawi,9 10 but the number of women screened in the first trimester was low in these two studies. One of the problems in interpreting this existing literature relates to the challenges of recruiting women early in pregnancy; most of the studies were not designed to assess the consequences of malaria early in pregnancy and therefore women were generally recruited late in the first trimester, which may lead to misclassification errors and underestimation of exposure. Besides, using LBW as a proxy for fetal growth restriction (FGR) can lead to the overestimation of FGR prevalence and possible bias when estimating the effect of malaria. Finally, maternal nutrition is one of the main factors influencing fetal growth in developing countries.11 Therefore, adjusting for this factor when assessing the effect of early malaria on FGR is important. As well, a recent study has suggested a higher risk of FGR due to malaria in undernourished women.12
The REtard de Croissance Intra-uterin et PALudisme (RECIPAL) study aimed to assess the effect of malaria (both microscopic and submicroscopic) in the first trimester of pregnancy on both the mother and the fetus, with a focus on fetal growth, by following a cohort of pregnant women recruited before conception. Moreover, it also aimed at assessing the influence of the woman’s nutritional status in the relationship between malaria in early pregnancy and birth outcomes.
Cohort description
Study setting
The study cohort is currently conducted in the districts of Sô-Ava and Abomey-Calavi, located in Southern Benin (figure 1). Women’s recruitment has been completed by December 2016, and pregnancy follow-up is still ongoing. In the area, malaria is hyperendemic with a mean entomological inoculation rate of 2.1 infected anopheles bites/person/100 nights.13 The main mosquito vectors of malaria are Anopheles gambiae ss and Anopheles funestus.14 Four subdistricts (Sô-Ava, Vekky and Houedo in Sô-Ava District and Akassato in Abomey-Calavi District) were selected for the study according to the population density and mean number of ANC visits and deliveries per month in the four main public maternity clinics of Sô-Ava and Abomey-Calavi districts. In these four subdistricts, the population size was estimated to 124 994 people in 2013, including 17.4% (21 779) women of reproductive age (WRA).15 Thirty-five out of a total of 36 villages were then selected for the study according to their proximity to the maternity clinics.
Study design, subject identification, recruitment and enrolment procedures
Briefly, WRAs were recruited at community level and followed monthly for a maximum period of 24 months until becoming pregnant. They constituted the RECIPAL initial cohort. The subsample of women who became pregnant was then followed up monthly at the maternity clinic from early pregnancy to delivery. They constituted the RECIPAL final cohort.
A sample size of 466 births was estimated sufficient to evidence a two-fold OR for the association between malaria and poor birth outcomes,4 assuming a prevalence of 25% of women with microscopic malaria in the first trimester of pregnancy and 30% of poor birth outcomes (LBW, small-for-gestational age (SGA), preterm birth (PTB) or stillbirth)8 16 17 with an 80% power, significant level at 0.05. We estimated that following 2000 WRA (initial cohort) would have allowed identifying 510 pregnant women (final cohort) during a planned 18-month period for recruitment in the initial cohort (based on a total fertility rate of 200/1000/year in Benin (http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/index.htm)) and allowing 15% of loss to follow-up after recruitment in the initial cohort.
After explanation of the study to the local political and administrative authorities, three concomitant procedures were used to recruit WRA. First, repeated sensitisation events were organised in each of the 35 selected villages for presenting the study to all inhabitants. If interested, women were invited to register with the head of the community and were visited at home the day after for their inclusion. That procedure constituted the main way of recruitment throughout the study. Second, leaders of the community, religious authorities and mass media were involved to help us mobilise women during public meetings (masses, women’s association meetings, etc). The last way of recruitment consisted of going door to door to identify eligible and interested women with the assistance a network of community health workers (more details are provided in the online supplementary file S1).
Supplementary file 1
To be included, women had met the following criteria: negative urinary pregnancy test, 18 to 45 years old, no current contraception, no previous fecundity issues, willingness to become pregnant, no planned travel for more than 2 months within the next 18 months, acceptance of RECIPAL protocol and signed written informed consent. Both oral and written communication was used for providing information on the project to the women and their husbands. The consent form was translated into the local language for women who were illiterate.
From June 2014 to December 2016, 1302 WRA were willing to participate in the study. Among them, 1214 (93.2%) met the inclusion criteria and were recruited, 88 (6.8%) were not included mainly because of a positive urinary pregnancy test at inclusion (63.6%) or past infertility issues (14.8%). Based on both the 2013 national census and the 2011–2012 Demographic Health Survey (DHS-IV) in Benin, we estimated that women included in the project represented 6% of the total number of WRA living in the study area. Compared with women included in Dansou et al study,18 which used individual data of a representative sample of WRA included in the Beninese DHS-IV, WRA included in RECIPAL had a higher level of poverty. The other sociodemographic characteristics such as age, education level, household wealth, gravidity and media exposure were, however, similar (online supplementary file S2).
Supplementary file 2
RECIPAL study was approved by the ethics committees of the Institut des Sciences Biomédicales Appliquées (ISBA) in Benin and from the National Research Institute for Sustainable Development in France as well as by the Ministry of Health in Benin.
Cohort follow-up
Preconceptional follow-up
After enrolment, WRAs were visited at home monthly by specifically trained investigators assisted by local community health workers. Follow-up consisted mainly of recording the first day of last menstrual period (LMP) and performing a urinary pregnancy test every month. To minimise the risk of loss of confidentiality during the tracking of women for follow-up, the study team was instructed to speak only to people—including family members—to whom women have granted them permission to speak. After 12 months, women who were still followed received medical advices to help conceive, and they were invited to attend the maternity clinic for a medical examination in case of symptoms of genital infection. After 24 months, the follow-up ended and women who did not conceive were invited to attend a gynaecologist for fertility issues assessment. More details on the follow-up procedures have been provided in the online supplementary file S3 .
Supplementary file 3
Gestational follow-up
Once pregnant, women were followed up at the maternity clinic for monthly ANC visits. In addition, they were encouraged to attend the maternity clinic any time in case of any symptoms. Both the maternity staff (for usual ANC follow-up and clinical examination) and study investigators (for all specific issues related to RECIPAL) were involved in women’s follow-up. Throughout the study, women were offered free transport to the maternity clinic; in Sô-Ava District, a free river shuttle was set up. At 37 weeks of gestation (wg), women were visited at home weekly and transportation to the study maternity clinic was scheduled for delivery.
According to Beninese national recommendations, a kit including iron and folic acid tablets for 1 month, mebendazole for deworming, the first dose of SP for IPTp and a LLITN was given to each pregnant woman at the first ANC visit. The maternity staff was encouraged to administer at least three doses of IPTp from the second trimester onwards as recommended by the Beninese National Malaria Control Programme, as well as iron and folic acid supplementation throughout the pregnancy. RECIPAL women benefited from free management of any diseases related to the pregnancy—detected either as part of RECIPAL follow-up or during unscheduled visits, free ANC visits and delivery. Women infected with malaria were treated with quinine in the first trimester of pregnancy and artemether–lumefantrine from the second trimester.
Infant follow-up
The infant follow-up was not initially planned as part of the RECIPAL project. It is currently carried out as part of the SEPSIS project (bioMérieux-funding, UMR216/9198 coordination), which aims to assess immune dysfunctions associated with the risk of sepsis in preterm and growth-restricted newborns as well as in those exposed to malaria in utero. All infants born from the RECIPAL women from April 2016 have been included and followed until 3 months of age.
Cohort attrition
Among the 411 pregnant women, 207 (50.4%) have already delivered, 16.5% (68/411) had a spontaneous abortion (n=68) or a non-viable pregnancy (n=2), 62 did not complete the study because of informed consent withdrawal (45/411, 10.9%) or migration (17/411, 4.1%) and 72 women are still followed (figure 2). Spontaneous abortions, informed consent withdrawals and migrations occurred at 8.9 (±3.9), 13.2 (±8.1) and 14.2 (±8.6) wg in average (SD), respectively. More details on the reasons for cohort attrition are provided in the online supplementary file S4 .
Supplementary file 4
Figure 2 presents the flowchart diagram of the study. Among the 1214 WRA enrolled in the initial cohort, 411 (33.9%) became pregnant, 359 (29.6%) completed the follow-up without conceiving and 444 women (36.6%) did not complete the study mainly because of informed consent withdrawal (272/444) or migration outside the study area (138/444) that occurred after 5.2 and 6.3 months of follow-up in average, respectively.
Data collection
Preconceptional data
Demographic, socioeconomic and household characteristics were collected at inclusion (table 1). At this occasion, screening for malaria, urinary schistosomiasis, Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae was performed. Haemoglobin (Hb) and markers of inflammation levels were determined. The first day of LMP was recorded and a urinary pregnancy test (One-Step; International Holding, Germany) was performed each month. Anthropometric measurements were collected every 3 months, and dietary intakes were assessed twice during follow-up.
Gestational data
At each ANC visit, clinical, anthropometric and obstetrical data, as well as LLITN use, IPTp administration, alcohol consumption and iron, folic acid and other micronutrient supplementation intake were collected (table 2). In addition, malarial screening was performed, and proteinuria, glycosuria and urinary infection were detected using a urine dipstick test (Combi-screen; Analyticon, Germany). Dietary intakes were assessed once every trimester. Five Doppler ultrasound scans (US) were performed. A sample of venous blood was collected in the first and third trimesters for Hb, markers of inflammation and lead levels determination.
At delivery, newborns were weighed within 1 hour after birth on an electronic digital scale with an accuracy of 2 g(SECA 757; SECA, Germany). Newborn’s length (SECA infantometer 416, Germany) and head circumference (SECA 201, Germany) were recorded to the nearest millimetre. Malarial screening was performed on maternal venous blood, placental and cord blood (table 2). A placental biopsy was performed for malarial histopathology. Follow-up and quality control procedures are provided in the online supplementary file S3.
The types and origins of the biological samples collected before and during pregnancy are listed in table 3. Total blood, serum, plasma urine samples are stored in −20°C or −80°C freezers with a daily monitoring of the temperature.
Specifics components
Malarial diagnosis
Before conception and during pregnancy, malarial screening was performed using both microscopy (thick blood smear) and PCR. Blood smears were stained with Giemsa and parasitaemia was quantified by the Lambaréné method.19 A molecular diagnostic approach, using a combination of real-time PCR assays comprising genus-specific primers and probes for the gene encoding, the small (18S) Plasmodium rRNA and an ultrasensitive Plasmodium falciparum-specific detection system20 were used to screen samples containing Plasmodium parasites. In addition, any time during pregnancy, a rapid diagnostic test (Pf+pan rapid test SD Bioline Ag, IDA Foundation, Netherlands; BioSynex, France) was performed in case of symptoms suggestive of malaria for immediate diagnosis and treatment.
Ultrasound follow-up
The first US for dating the pregnancy was performed between 9 and 13 wg based on LMP recorded during the preconceptional follow-up (see online supplementary file S5). The gestational age (GA) was estimated in days based on crown-rump length measurement using the Robinson’s chart.21 At the end, GA estimation was based either on LMP if the difference between the two measurements (LMP/US) was less than 7 days or on US if the difference is >7 days. Following INTERGROWTH-21st methodology, four additional scans were performed for fetal biometry assessment and uterine and umbilical blood flow measurements.22 Each parameter was measured twice and then averaged; a third measure was performed in case of discrepancy between the two first measurements. A quality control was performed on 10% of the pictures.
Supplementary file 5
Anthropometric measurements and dietary intake assessment
Anthropometric measurements were collected using standard procedures (tables 1 and 2).23 During household visits, women’s body weight was measured with a 200 g precision with calibrated electronic scales (Tefal, France). At the facility level, women were weighed with a Tanita MC-780 body composition device (Tanita, Tokyo, Japan). Height was measured to the nearest millimetre with a SECA 206 (Hamburg, Germany) gauge. The left mid-upper-arm-circumference was measured with a SECA 201 (Hamburg, Germany) ergonomic circumference measuring tape. Skinfold thickness measurements were made to the nearest millimetre at the triceps and biceps sites using a Holtain (Crymyeh, UK) skinfold calliper. The set of measurements was repeated twice—by the same field investigator—and then the measurements were averaged. Body composition, assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis method, was measured by the multifrequency body composition analyser Tanita MC-780 with a four-electrode arrangement paired on hands and feet. A quality control of anthropometric data was performed periodically by a senior research scientist in nutrition.
Dietary intakes were assessed by 24-hour recalls using the standard multiple-pass methodology.24 A comprehensive list of the most common food items and recipes was developed from a preliminary study of the diet habits of the study area. This list was used to identify foods mentioned by the women as consumed during the interview. Amounts of food consumed were estimated by household measures consisted of precalibrated utensils, food pictures of different portion sizes and monetary value of known food portions sold on the study area markets. A food composition table and recipes database are under construction for conversion of household units to gram and to determine macronutrients and micronutrients intake by the women.
Characteristics of the study populations
At enrolment, WRA were 27 years old in average (table 4). Nulligravidae represented 8.8% of the cohort. More than half of the women were anaemic, one quarter was infected with schistosomiasis and 38% had an abnormal body mass index. The prevalence of microscopic malaria was 5.7%, with two geographical clusters in Sô-Ava and Vekky subdistricts (figure 3). The median duration of follow-up in the initial cohort was 5.9 months (mean=7.1, range: 0.49–23.7). Compared with women included in the initial cohort, women who did not complete the follow-up were significantly different in terms of residence area, ethnicity, household density and schistosomiasis status (table 4).
Pregnant women were identified at a mean of 6.9 wg and benefited from 7.5 scheduled ANC visits in average (table 4). The prevalence of microscopic malarial infection was 25.4%, 19.4% and 16.1% during the first, second and third trimester of pregnancy, respectively. The prevalence of SGA was 11.5% and 18.3% using Schmiegelow’s and INTERGROWTH-21st charts, respectively (table 5). The proportion of PTB and LBW was 12.6% and 9.3%, respectively. Overall, 29.5% (61/207) of newborns presented at least one poor birth outcome defined as LBW, PTB, SGA or stillbirth.
Findings to date
Fertility and time to pregnancy
The median time to pregnancy was 12.3 months (figure 4). The fertility rate was 5.4 pregnancies/100 persons-month (95% CI =4.9 to 5.9). The probability (95% CI) of conceiving after 5, 10, 15 and 20 months of follow-up were 24.5% (21.9–27.4), 42.1% (38.6–45.9), 56.6% (52.1–61.1) and 62.8% (57.6–68), respectively. Using multivariate survival analysis, factors associated with a lower risk of conceiving were maternal age more than 35 years, a low education level, being polygamous, living in Vekky subdistrict, long-term couple (>8 years), infrequent sexual activity, overweight and urinary schistosomiasis infection (E Yovo, personal communication, 2017).
Malaria in the first trimester of pregnancy
The incidence rate of malarial infection during the first trimester was 19.7 cases per 100 persons-month (95% CI 15.8 to 24.5). Using a multilevel logistic regression, we showed that women infected with malaria before conception were more likely to be infected during the first trimester (adjusted OR (aOR): 2.68, 95% CI 1.24 to 5.78). Gestational age was also negatively correlated with malarial infection (aOR: 0.64, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.98) (M Accrombessi, personal communication, 2017).
Strengths and limitations
The preconceptional design—and early identification of pregnant women—allowed (1) the screening of women for malaria from the very beginning of pregnancy; (2) the accurate estimation of GA by using US before 14 wg; (3) the determination of prepregnancy nutritional status25 and hypertensive disorders screening,26 which highly influence fetal growth and (4) the minimisation of selection bias embedded in the design of women recruited at facility level. Besides, PTB and intrauterine growth restriction could be accurately assessed thanks to the precise estimation of GA and longitudinal fetal growth assessment.
In addition to malaria, RECIPAL will provide valuable information on WRA in Africa in terms of fertility and nutrition, which are seldom evaluated and may help to define new preconceptional interventions for improving maternal and child health.27 Also, it yields logistical and ethical information for the implementation of future preconceptional cohorts.
Only 107 (8%) nulligravidae were included in the study. The main reason is that RECIPAL was implemented shortly after a study, which has recruited nulligravid WRAs living in the same area. This study aimed at assessing maternal immune responses in early pregnancy to help designing a phase 1 vaccine trial against malaria. It included 278 nulligravid WRAs, of whom 60 became pregnant.28 Both studies were conducted concomitantly for several months and women already included in the first study could not be eligible for RECIPAL. Because primigravidae were under-represented in the final RECIPAL cohort, it is likely that the prevalence of maternal conditions related to primigravidity were underestimated. Although we cannot completely exclude selection bias, it should not have strongly influenced the association between malaria in early pregnancy and FGR.
Finally, because of constraints related to the study design (long duration of the preconceptional follow-up and weariness of the women) and African sociocultural realities (rumour about blood collection, suspicion regarding medical care provided free of charge, etc), a noticeable proportion (22%) of women withdrew their informed consent before the end of the 24-month follow-up. Overall, the initial cohort attrition was 37%. Since some baseline characteristics in women who completed the preconceptional follow-up and those who did not were different, this might impact the external validity of some of results. During pregnancy, there was a high proportion (16.5%) of spontaneous abortions, which contributed to the final cohort attrition. At the end, birth outcomes could be evaluated in only 68% of women, with a possible lack of power for some upcoming analyses.
Conclusion
If the deleterious effects of malaria in the first trimester of pregnancy are confirmed, our results may argue in favour of starting preventive measures from the very beginning of pregnancy or even before pregnancy. Artemisinin-based combination therapies have been shown to be safe during the first trimester of pregnancy and, therefore, may be a good option for the replacement of SP.29 Besides, a vaccine against pregnancy-associated malarial parasites, which could elicit protective immunity prior to pregnancy to best protect pregnant women during early pregnancy may be proposed as a complementary strategy. Such a vaccine is currently under evaluation.30
Acknowledgments
We are extremely grateful to all families who took part in this study, the midwifes, nurses and community health workers for recruiting and following them and the whole RECIPAL team, including research scientists, engineers, technicians and managers. We also thank Seun Egbinola for study area mapping.
References
Footnotes
Contributors Project management: MA, NF, AM, MC and VB (principal investigator). Field, epidemiology and data collection: MA, EY, GC, GA, PA, NF and VB. Nutritional data collection: YM-P, AG, NF-F, DD, MA and EY. Biology and molecular analyses: NF, NT-N and SH. Obstetrical data collection: MA, EY, NJ and VB.Statistical analysis: MA, GC, MC, JZ, FB-L, YM-P, AG, NF-F, DD and VB. Manuscript writing: MA, GA, GC, AG, YM-P, NFF, DD, JZ, NTM, FB-L, SH, MC, NF and VB.
Funding This study was supported by the French National Research Agency (ANR, ANR-13-JSV1-0004, grant 2013) and the Fondation de France (no: 00074147, grant 2017). MA was funded by the Réseau doctoral de l’Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Santé Publique (EHESP) for PhD scholarship and received a prize from the Fondation des Treilles (http://www.les-treilles.com/en/).
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Obtained.
Ethics approval The ethics committees of the Institut des Sciences Biomédicales Appliquées (ISBA) and the Ministry of Health in Benin.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement The researchers associated with this study are open for the sharing and reuse of the data, but an end-user data use agreement will be required for accessing the data. Collaborations are encouraged, although data sets are not currently publicly available. Any researcher interested in exploring RECIPAL data should contact directly the principal investigator, Valerie Briand (email: valerie.briand@ird.fr)
Collaborators The “Mother and child face to tropical infections” research unit (MERIT), French National Research Institute for Sustainable Development (IRD)/Paris Descartes University was the promoter of the study. RECIPAL was a collaborative project between MERIT, another IRD research unit (Nutripass, Montpellier), EPOPé research team (Inserm), the Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Santé Publique (EHESP) and two Beninese collaborators from Abomey-Calavi University (the Faculty of Health Sciences and the Faculty of Agronomy Sciences).