Aim To describe changes in rate of CPR, Compression Only CPR (CO-CPR), and 30–day survival over 3 different time-periods of CPR guidelines in Sweden. We hypothesised that increased use of CO-CPR would be associated with increased CPR-rates and similar survival compared to standard CPR.
Methods Registry based cohort study including all bystander witnessed cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests reported to the Swedish register for cardio-pulmonary resuscitation in 2000–2014. Exposure was categorised as bystander CPR or No-CPR. Bystander CPR was further categorised into Standard CPR with rescue breathing and ventilation (S-CPR) or CO-CPR. Primary outcome was 30 day survival.
Results 23620 patients were included. Total rates of bystander CPR increased from 36% in 2000 to 68% in 2014. S-CPR increased from 31% in 2000 to 38% in 2014. CO-CPR increased from 5% in 2000 to 30% 2014. Overall, there was no significant difference in survival among patients receiving CO-CPR or S-CPR (13.6% vs. 12.9% p=0.3).
Conclusion Increase in bystander CPR during the last 15 years in Sweden was associated with an increase in CO-CPR. Overall 30 day survival was not different when comparing CO-CPR to S-CPR.
Conflict of interest None declared.
Funding None declared.
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ .
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.