You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 7, Issue 8
  • The Chinese version of the Severe Respiratory Insufficiency questionnaire for patients with chronic hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease receiving non-invasive positive pressure ventilation

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

XML
Respiratory medicine
Research
The Chinese version of the Severe Respiratory Insufficiency questionnaire for patients with chronic hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease receiving non-invasive positive pressure ventilation
  1. Rongchang Chen1,
  2. Lili Guan1,
  3. Weiliang Wu1,
  4. Zhicong Yang2,
  5. Xiaoying Li1,
  6. Qun Luo1,
  7. Zhenyu Liang1,
  8. Fengyan Wang1,
  9. Bingpeng Guo1,
  10. Yating Huo1,
  11. Yuqiong Yang1,
  12. Luqian Zhou1
  1. 1 State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
  2. 2 Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, China
  1. Correspondence to Prof Luqian Zhou; zhlx09{at}163.com

Abstract

Objectives The Severe Respiratory Insufficiency (SRI) questionnaire is the best assessment tool for health-related quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) receiving non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV). This study aimed to translate the SRI Questionnaire into Chinese and to validate it.

Design Prospective validation study.

Setting and participants A total of 149 participants with chronic hypercapnic COPD receiving NIPPV completed the study.

Methods The SRI questionnaire was translated into Chinese using translation and back-translation. Reliability was gauged using Cronbach’s α coefficient. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to assess construct validity. Content validity was confirmed by evaluating the relationship between the score of each item and the total score of the relevant subscale.

Results Cronbach’s α coefficients for each subscale and summary scale were above 0.7. Using EFA, one factor was extracted from the anxiety and summary scales and two factors were extracted from the remaining six subscales. Based on the EFA results, subsequent CFA revealed a good model fit for each subscale, but the extracted factors of each subscale were correlated. Content validity was confirmed by the good relationship between the score of each item and the total score of the relevant subscale.

Conclusion The Chinese version of the SRI questionnaire is valid and reliable for patients with chronic hypercapnic COPD receiving NIPPV in China.

Trial registration number NCT02499718.

  • The Severe Respiratory Insufficiency Questionnaire
  • Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation
  • Health-related quality of life
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • Reliability and validity

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017712

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Strengths and limitations of this study

    • This is the first study to validate the Chinese version of the Severe Respiratory Insufficiency questionnaire for patients with chronic hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease receiving non-invasive positive pressure ventilation.

    • The Severe Respiratory Insufficiency questionnaire is developed for patients receiving long-term non-invasive positive pressure ventilation.

    • Only patients with COPD were included, and patients with other diseases requiring long-term non-invasive positive pressure ventilation were excluded.

    • Criterion validity was not obtained by comparing the Chinese version of the Severe Respiratory Insufficiency questionnaire with generic questionnaires.

    Introduction

    Health-related quality of life (HRQL) questionnaires are important for assessing the influence of diseases on the routine lives of patients with chronic diseases.1 Over the past few years, many questionnaires have been established to appraise patients’ HRQL including generic questionnaires and disease-specific questionnaires. Generic questionnaires (eg, the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36)2 and the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D)3) are ordinarily used to evaluate patients’ general state of health and are often used for health surveys, whereas disease-specific questionnaires are generally more concerned with the influence of a given disease on patients’ HRQL. For instance, questionnaires validated for use among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)4 include the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ),5 the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ)6 and the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ).7

    COPD is a major cause of mortality and morbidity throughout the world, and it results in a huge burden on the economy and society. Advanced stage COPD is characterised by chronic hypoxaemia and hypercapnia, which is thought to be the result of respiratory muscle fatigue, altering central ventilatory control and chronic hypoventilation.8 Nowadays, a recommended treatment for patients with chronic hypercapnic COPD is non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), which overcomes the work of breathing and improves chronic alveolar hypoventilation to correct hypercapnia.8 9 Patients with chronic hypercapnic COPD are usually at an advanced stage of COPD and their airflow limitations are always irreversible to their normal levels. Hence, the therapeutic regimen should be aimed at slowing the progression of the disease and improving their HRQL. However, many vital parts of these patients’ HRQL may not be included in the generic or disease-specific questionnaires, so only partial information on their daily lives is obtained. Duiverman et al 10 pointed out that the CRQ7 was more concerned with the patient’s anxiety and the Maugeri Foundation Respiratory Failure Questionnaire (MRF-28),11 which also evaluates the HRQL of patients with chronic respiratory failure, focuses more on the restriction of patients' activities but does not cover the psychological domain. Oga et al 12 also found that the SGRQ5 was not suitable for all patients with COPD because some items could be used for patients with severe conditions. Hence, a questionnaire designed for these patients is necessary.

    The Severe Respiratory Insufficiency (SRI) questionnaire, designed for patients receiving home NIPPV, has good psychometric properties and has been proved to be valid for patients with chronic hypercapnic COPD receiving home NIPPV.13 14 This questionnaire was originally designed in Germany. It has been translated into many languages, and the reliability and validity of its English, Spanish, Norwegian and French versions have been demonstrated.15–18 However, no Chinese version of the SRI questionnaire has yet been validated in previously published work. Hence, in the present study, we translated the original version of the SRI questionnaire and evaluated its reliability and validity for use among patients with chronic hypercapnic COPD receiving home NIPPV in China.

    Methods

    The ethics committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China approved this study and all patients provided written informed consent before the start of the study. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02499718.

    Patients and study design

    This study was part of a multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled clinical trial to assess the effect of NIPPV in patients with chronic hypercapnic COPD. A total of 149 participants participated in the study. All were clinically stable with chronic hypercapnic COPD (prolonged hypercapnia during daytime at rest without oxygen or ventilatory support for at least 3 months)8 and had been receiving home NIPPV via facial or nasal mask for at least 4 weeks.15 Patients were deemed to be clinically stable if they had no acute exacerbation, which was defined as an acute worsening of more than one respiratory symptom (new onset of or increase in dyspnoea, sputum purulence, sputum volume, wheezing, cough or fever) lasting for at least two consecutive days and resulting in any change in the patient’s regular medication.8 Exclusion criteria were (1) other lung/pleural diseases (eg, bronchiectasis, bronchogenic carcinoma, neuromuscular diseases) or thoracic deformities; (2) severe heart failure (New York Heart Association stage IV), severe arrhythmias, unstable angina or malignant comorbidities; (3) obesity (body mass index ≥35 kg/m²); and (4) severe obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome.

    Pulmonary function (Jaeger, Wuerzburg, Germany) was measured using a standardised process in accordance with the guideline of the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society.19 Daytime arterial blood gas analysis was performed with patients resting in a sitting position and breathing room air without using NIPPV.

    The SRI questionnaire

    Before translation we had contacted the developer of the SRI questionnaire and obtained permission to use it and to translate and to validate it within scientific trials. We translated the original questionnaire (see online supplement 1) into Chinese following the translation and back-translation procedure.20 21 First, two translators independently translated the questionnaire from German to Chinese. A committee consisting of these two translators and the project manager then inspected the two forward translations and combined them into a single forward translation. Next, a translator who had not seen the original questionnaire back-translated the combined translation into German. The same committee then reviewed the back translation in order to guarantee the conceptual equivalence of the translation. The Chinese version (see online supplement 2) of the SRI questionnaire was then sent to eight participants with chronic hypercapnic COPD receiving long-term home NIPPV to ensure that the translation was comprehensible and applicable to the patient population. In the last step of the process, the final version was prepared for validation.

    Supplementary Material

    Supplementary material 1

    Supplementary Material

    Supplementary material 2

    The SRI questionnaire includes 49 items on seven subscales: respiratory complaints (RC: 8 items), physical functioning (PF: 6 items), attendant symptoms and sleep (AS: 7 items), social relationships (SR: 6 items), anxiety (AX: 5 items), psychological well-being (WB: 9 items) and social functioning (SF: 8 items). One summary scale (SS) can summarise all of these subscales. A 5-point Likert scale was used for each item (1=completely untrue; 2=mostly untrue; 3=sometimes true; 4=mostly true; 5=always true), with scores ranging from 0 to 100 for every subscale possible following the transformation of the raw values.13 All of the items are about the condition of the patient’s health in the last week. Higher scores indicate better HRQL.

    Statistical analysis

    Data analysis was conducted using SPSS Version 21.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY, USA) and Amos 21.0. The data are presented as n (%) or mean±SD; p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Floor and ceiling effects were obtained by calculating the percentage of patients with the maximal or minimal item scores for each subscale. If these percentages were >15%, the floor or ceiling effects were recognised as high.22 Reliability was obtained by analysing internal consistency, which was calculated using Cronbach’s α coefficient. A Cronbach’s α coefficient >0.70 was considered good.23 Validity was measured as construct validity and content validity. Examining the scale structure, construct validity was assessed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). EFA was performed using SPSS Version 21.0 and only factors with eigenvalues greater than unity (>1) were extracted. CFA was then used to examine the results obtained through EFA. If more than one factor was extracted from a subscale, CFA should determine whether these factors are related to each other. Model fit was achieved through the goodness of fit index (GFI) and comparative fit index (CFI). A GFI and CFI >0.9 indicated good model fit. CFA was conducted using Amos 21.0. Content validity was assessed by evaluating the relationship between the score on each item and the total score on the relevant subscale using the Spearman correlation coefficient to determine whether each item could reflect the purpose of each subscale. r=>0.50 and p<0.05 were considered good.

    Results

    A total of 149 participants with a mean age of 67.82±10.01 years completed the questionnaire. All of the participants had chronic hypercapnia (mean PaCO2 56.93±3.23 mm Hg) and severe airflow obstruction with a mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of 24.21±6.60% predicted. Detailed baseline demographic data and clinical characteristics are presented in table 1.

    View this table:
    Table 1

    Baseline demographic data and clinical characteristics of patients

    Score distributions

    The highest mean scores of each subscale were on SRI-AS and the lowest mean scores were on SRI-SF, with mean scores of 62.81±16.85 and 43.56±21.61, respectively. The mean scores of SRI-SS were 52.93±15.11. The percentage of patients with maximal or minimal item scores for each subscale ranged from 0% to 3.4%, indicating that no floor or ceiling effects occurred in the SRI questionnaire. More detailed information is shown in table 2.

    View this table:
    Table 2

    Scores and reliability of the Chinese version of Severe Respiratory Insufficiency (SRI) questionnaire

    Reliability

    Reliability was assessed by analysing internal consistency. The Cronbach’s α coefficients for SRI-PF, SRI-RC, SRI-AS, SRI-SR, SRI-AX, SRI-SF and SRI-WB were 0.80, 0.74, 0.71, 0.83, 0.88, 0.88 and 0.92, respectively. The Cronbach’s α coefficient for SRI-SS was 0.95. The Cronbach’s α coefficients for each subscale and the summary scale were all above 0.7, indicating good internal consistency (table 2).

    Validity

    EFA confirmed that only one factor could be extracted from SRI-AX. From SRI-PF, SRI-RC, SRI-AS, SRI-SR, SRI-SF and SRI-WB, two factors could be extracted. The percentage of the total variance that could be accounted for by the extracted factors of each subscale ranged from 55.58% to 73.90% (table 3). Additionally, only one factor was extracted from SRI-SS and this factor accounted for 59.03% of the total variance. A high percentage of the total variance of SRI-SS confirmed that one summary scale could summarise the seven subscales of the SRI questionnaire. Based on the results of the EFA, subsequent analysis of the subscales using CFA showed that the GFI and CFI were >0.9 for each subscale, indicating that the model fit for each subscale was good (table 4). The two factors extracted from each of the subscales except SRI-AX were all correlated (r values ranged from 0.32 to 0.74). In addition, good content validity was found by examining the relationships between the score of each item and the total score of the relevant subscale. The correlation coefficient ranged from 0.4 to 0.86. Forty-five items (91.8%) correlated moderately (r=>0.5) with the relevant total subscale scores. The r values of the remaining four items (8.2%) were all >0.4. The p values for these correlations were all <0.05 (table 5).

    View this table:
    Table 3

    Exploratory factor analysis

    View this table:
    Table 4

    Confirmatory factor analysis

    View this table:
    Table 5

    Correlation analysis (Spearman) between the score of each item and the total score of the relevant subscale

    Discussion

    To our knowledge, this is the first time that the SRI questionnaire has been translated into Chinese and validated in patients with chronic hypercapnic COPD receiving NIPPV in China. Our results showed that the Chinese version of the SRI questionnaire had good reliability and validity.

    In this study we found that the percentage of patients with maximal or minimal item scores for each subscale ranged from 0% to 3.4%. Because all of these were below 15%, we concluded that no floor or ceiling effects could be detected in the SRI questionnaire. Reliability was obtained through internal consistency using the Cronbach’s α coefficient. The Cronbach’s α coefficients for each scale varied from 0.71 to 0.92, and the Cronbach’s α coefficient for SRI-SS was 0.95. This indicated that the questionnaire had good reliability. In the original SRI questionnaire,13 Cronbach’s α coefficient varied from 0.73 to 0.79 in three subscales and from 0.80 to 0.89 in the remaining four subscales. In the English version of the SRI questionnaire,15 only one subscale had Cronbach’s α coefficient <0.8 and the Cronbach’s α coefficients of the remaining subscales were all 0.80–0.89. In the Spanish and Norwegian versions,16 17 Cronbach’s α coefficients varied from 0.62 to 0.7 in one subscale, from 0.73 to 0.79 in two subscales, and from 0.8 to 0.89 for the remaining subscales. Compared with other versions of the SRI questionnaire, the reliability of the Chinese version was similar and acceptable. The differences between other versions and the Chinese version might be that the number of participants in our study, which was larger than in the Spanish and Norwegian versions, was different in each validation. Furthermore, patients with various diseases requiring long-term mechanical ventilation were included in other validation studies while only patients with COPD were included in our study. Construct validity was evaluated by factor analysis. EFA showed that one factor could be extracted from SRI-AX and that two factors could be extracted from each of the remaining six subscales. Most importantly, only one factor could be extracted from SRI-SS, and this factor accounted for a high percentage of the total variance which was similar to the original German version.13 14 Additionally, CFA showed that GFI and CFI were all >0.9, demonstrating a good model fit for each subscale. For example, in SRI-SR, one factor captured the relationship between patients and their friends and the other factor was concerned with the negative emotions of patients. However, the factors extracted for each subscale were interrelated and not independent of each other. Hence, the original structure of the questionnaire could be preserved. Content validity was confirmed through the relationship between the score of each item and the total score of the relevant subscale. The r values of the items were all >0.5 except for four items. Nevertheless, the r values of these four items were >0.4, indicating that approximately moderate correlations existed between these items and the relevant subscales. Taken together, these findings indicate that the questionnaire had good content validity.

    Overall, the SRI questionnaire, designed for patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure receiving long-term home mechanical ventilation, has good psychometric properties.13 Struik et al 24 demonstrated that the CCQ,6 CRQ,7 MRF-2811 and SRI13 questionnaires were all reliable and valid for patients with advanced stage COPD with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure, and that the SRI questionnaire was best for the appraisal of HRQL in these patients. Several previous clinical studies of patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure receiving long-term home mechanical ventilation have reported differing results on HRQL. This may be the result of using different questionnaires to assess patients’ HRQL without uniform criteria.25–27

    This study has some limitations. First, only patients with COPD were included and not patients with other diseases requiring long-term mechanical ventilation. Second, criterion validity was not obtained by comparing the Chinese version of the SRI questionnaire with the generic questionnaires. This was because another questionnaire such as SF-36 was not designed to perform before the study so we could not obtain the criterion validity. It is also acceptable for assessing the construct and content validity.14 28 In addition, we will assess the criterion validity of the SRI questionnaire in a future study. Recently, Windisch et al 28 showed that the SRI questionnaire was valid for patients with COPD receiving long-term home oxygen therapy. Therefore, in the near future, we plan to assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the SRI questionnaire in patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure who also have other diseases requiring long-term home mechanical ventilation and in patients with COPD receiving long-term home oxygen therapy.

    In conclusion, the Chinese version of the SRI questionnaire is valid and reliable for patients with chronic hypercapnic COPD receiving NIPPV in China. This questionnaire can be used in further scientific trials for assessing the effect of long-term home NIPPV on the HRQL of patients with chronic hypercapnic COPD.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors wish to thank Curative Medical Inc (China) for providing the ventilators. The study was supported by the Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province (2017A020211018) and the Guangzhou Healthcare collaborative innovation major project (201604040012) and State’s Key Project of Research and Development Plan (2017YFC1310600).

    References

    1. 1.↵
      2. Higginson I ,
      3. Carr A
      . Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting. BMJ 2001;322:1297–300.
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    2. 2.↵
      2. Ware JE ,
      3. Sherbourne CD
      . The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473–83.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    3. 3.↵
      EuroQol Group. EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990;16:199–208.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    4. 4.↵
      2. Testa MA ,
      3. Simonson DC
      . Assessment of quality-of-life outcomes. N Engl J Med 1996;334:835–40.doi:10.1056/NEJM199603283341306
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    5. 5.↵
      2. Jones PW ,
      3. Quirk FH ,
      4. Baveystock CM
      . The St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire. Respir Med 1991;85:25–31.doi:10.1016/S0954-6111(06)80166-6
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    6. 6.↵
      2. van der Molen T ,
      3. Willemse BW ,
      4. Schokker S , et al
      . Development, validity and responsiveness of the Clinical COPD Questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003;1:13.doi:10.1186/1477-7525-1-13
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    7. 7.↵
      2. Guyatt GH ,
      3. Berman LB ,
      4. Townsend M , et al
      . A measure of quality of life for clinical trials in chronic lung disease. Thorax 1987;42:773–8.doi:10.1136/thx.42.10.773
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    8. 8.↵
      Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD. 2017. http://goldcopd.org.
    9. 9.↵
      2. Duiverman ML ,
      3. Wempe JB ,
      4. Bladder G , et al
      . Nocturnal non-invasive ventilation in addition to rehabilitation in hypercapnic patients with COPD. Thorax 2008;63:1052–7.doi:10.1136/thx.2008.099044
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    10. 10.↵
      2. Duiverman ML ,
      3. Wempe JB ,
      4. Bladder G , et al
      . Health-related quality of life in COPD patients with chronic respiratory failure. Eur Respir J 2008;32:379–86.doi:10.1183/09031936.00163607
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    11. 11.↵
      2. Carone M ,
      3. Bertolotti G ,
      4. Anchisi F , et al
      . Analysis of factors that characterize health impairment in patients with chronic respiratory failure. Eur Respir J 1999;13:1293–300.doi:10.1183/09031936.99.13613019
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    12. 12.↵
      2. Oga T ,
      3. Taniguchi H ,
      4. Kita H , et al
      . Analysis of the relationship between health status and mortality in hypercapnic patients with noninvasive ventilation. Clin Respir J 2015 (Epub ahead of print).doi:10.1111/crj.12415
    13. 13.↵
      2. Windisch W ,
      3. Freidel K ,
      4. Schucher B , et al
      . The Severe Respiratory Insufficiency (SRI) Questionnaire: a specific measure of health-related quality of life in patients receiving home mechanical ventilation. J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56:752–9.doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00088-X
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    14. 14.↵
      2. Windisch W ,
      3. Budweiser S ,
      4. Heinemann F , et al
      . The Severe Respiratory Insufficiency Questionnaire was valid for COPD patients with severe chronic respiratory failure. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:848–53.doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.09.009
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    15. 15.↵
      2. Ghosh D ,
      3. Rzehak P ,
      4. Elliott MW , et al
      . Validation of the English Severe Respiratory Insufficiency Questionnaire. Eur Respir J 2012;40:408–15.doi:10.1183/09031936.00152411
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    16. 16.↵
      2. López-Campos JL ,
      3. Failde I ,
      4. Masa JF , et al
      . Transculturally adapted Spanish SRI questionnaire for home mechanically ventilated patients was viable, valid, and reliable. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:1061–6.doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.09.002
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    17. 17.↵
      2. Markussen H ,
      3. Lehmann S ,
      4. Nilsen RM , et al
      . The Norwegian version of the Severe Respiratory Insufficiency Questionnaire. Int J Nurs Pract 2015;21:229–38.doi:10.1111/ijn.12256
      OpenUrl
    18. 18.↵
      2. Cuvelier A ,
      3. Lamia B ,
      4. Molano L-C , et al
      . Traduction française et adaptation culturelle du questionnaire SRI. Questionnaire de qualité de vie liée à la santé des patients insuffisants respiratoires chroniques traités par ventilation à domicile. Rev Mal Respir 2012;29:705–13.doi:10.1016/j.rmr.2011.12.015
      OpenUrlPubMed
    19. 19.↵
      2. Miller MR ,
      3. Hankinson J ,
      4. Brusasco V , et al
      . Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J 2005;26:319–38.doi:10.1183/09031936.05.00034805
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    20. 20.↵
      2. Wild D ,
      3. Grove A ,
      4. Martin M , et al
      . Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health 2005;8:94–104.doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    21. 21.↵
      2. McKenna SP ,
      3. Doward LC
      . The translation and cultural adaptation of patient-reported outcome measures. Value Health 2005;8:89–91.doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.08203.x
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    22. 22.↵
      2. Terwee CB ,
      3. Bot SD ,
      4. de Boer MR , et al
      . Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:34–42.doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    23. 23.↵
      Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use (5th edition). Aust N Z J Public Health 2016;40:294–5.doi:10.1111/1753-6405.12484
      OpenUrl
    24. 24.↵
      2. Struik FM ,
      3. Kerstjens HA ,
      4. Bladder G , et al
      . The Severe Respiratory Insufficiency Questionnaire scored best in the assessment of health-related quality of life in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Clin Epidemiol 2013;66:1166–74.doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.04.013
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    25. 25.↵
      2. Windisch W
      ; Quality of Life in Home Mechanical Ventilation Study Group. Impact of home mechanical ventilation on health-related quality of life. Eur Respir J 2008;32:1328–36.doi:10.1183/09031936.00066407
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    26. 26.↵
      2. McEvoy RD ,
      3. Pierce RJ ,
      4. Hillman D , et al
      . Nocturnal non-invasive nasal ventilation in stable hypercapnic COPD: a randomised controlled trial. Thorax 2009;64:561–6.doi:10.1136/thx.2008.108274
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    27. 27.↵
      2. Köhnlein T ,
      3. Windisch W ,
      4. Köhler D , et al
      . Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for the treatment of severe stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a prospective, multicentre, randomised, controlled clinical trial. Lancet Respir Med 2014;2:698–705.doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70153-5
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    28. 28.↵
      2. Walterspacher S ,
      3. July J ,
      4. Kohlhäufl M , et al
      . The Severe Respiratory Insufficiency Questionnaire for subjects with COPD with long-term oxygen therapy. Respir Care 2016 61:1186–91.doi:10.4187/respcare.04574
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Contributors CRC and GLL contributed to the conception and design of the study, drafting the submitted article and revising the draft critically for important intellectual content. WWL, YZC and LXY contributed to the translation, data acquisition, interpretation of outcomes, data analysis and drafting the submitted article. ZLQ contributed to crucial revision of the draft for important intellectual content and providing final confirmation of the revised version to be published. LQ, LZY and WFY contributed to getting the permission of the original questionnaire, data entry, analysis and interpretation of data. GBP, HYT and YYQ contributed to following up the patients, collecting, extracting and analysing the data. All authors contributed to data analysis, drafting the manuscript, amending the paper and being responsible for all aspects of the work. All the data could be accessed to all of the authors and all of the authors assured the accuracy of the reported data.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Ethics approval The Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    • Data sharing statement Extra data are available by emailing the corresponding author.