Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Person-centred Climate Questionnaire - Staff version (PCQ-S)
  1. Le Cai1,
  2. Gerd Ahlström2,
  3. Pingfen Tang1,
  4. Ke Ma3,
  5. David Edvardsson4,
  6. Lina Behm2,
  7. Haiyan Fu3,
  8. Jie Zhang3,
  9. Jiqun Yang3
  1. 1 School of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
  2. 2 Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  3. 3 Division of Palliative Care, The Third People's Hospital of Kunming, Kunming, China
  4. 4 Austin Health/Northern Health Clinical Schools of Nursing, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Le Cai; 1018606825{at}qq.com

Abstract

Objectives The aim of the study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of a Chinese translation of the English version of the Person-centred Climate Questionnaire – Staff version (PCQ-S) for Chinese palliative care staff in a hospital context.

Design This was a cross-sectional design. The 14-item English PCQ-S was translated and backtranslated using established procedures. Construct validity and reliability including internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed among hospital staff. Construct validity was tested using principal component analysis (PCA), internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha, and test-retest reliability was evaluated with the weighted kappa (Kp), Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).

Setting This study was conducted in three hospitals in Kunming, the capital of Yunnan province in south-west China.

Participants A sample of hospital staff (n=163) on duty in the palliative care departments of three hospitals in Kunming consented to participate in the study.

Results The 14-item Chinese PCQ-S consists of the three subscales also present in other language versions. It showed strong internal consistency, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.94 for the total scale, 0.87 for the safety subscale, 0.90 for the everydayness subscale and 0.88 for the community subscale. The Chinese PCQ-S had high test-retest reliability as evidenced by a high Kp coefficient and a high correlation coefficient for all scales between test and retest scores, on ‘a climate of safety’ (Kp=0.77, r=0.88, p<0.01), ‘a climate of everydayness’ (Kp=0.82, r=0.91, p<0.01), ‘a climate of community’ (Kp=0.75, r=0.79, p<0.01), and on overall scale scores (Kp=0.85, r=0.93, p<0.01). The ICC to evaluate the test-retest reliability was 0.97 (95% CI 0.95 to 0.98).

Conclusions The Chinese version of the PCQ-S showed satisfactory reliability and validity for assessing staff perceptions of person-centred care in Chinese hospital environments.

  • Geriatric Medicine
  • Palliative Care
  • Person-centred Care
  • Psychometric Evaluation
  • China
  • Nursing Staff

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors LC was responsible for the study design, data analysis, and drafting the paper. GA , PT and KM contributed to the study design and provided comments on the paper during the writing process. DE and LB provided comments on the paper during the writing process. HF, JZ and JY were responsible for the data collection.

  • Funding The study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Fund of China (Grant number: 81611130077), the Swedish Research Council (Grant number: 2015?06243) and the Major Union Specific Project Foundation of Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Department and Kunming Medical University (2016).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethics approval This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kunming Medical University.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.