Download PDFPDF

Defining and measuring suspicion of sepsis: an analysis of routine data
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Improving the specificity of Suspicion of Sepsis
    • Tom Lewis, National Lead for GIRFT Programme in Pathology North Devon District Hospital

    We know that coding of sepsis is poor.

    This absence of reliable data makes it hard to compare approaches over time and between locations.

    The SoS paper basically lists a lot of codes that the authors associated with infection.

    The authors identified 267 codes indicating possible infection.

    There were 47475 cases with these codes as a primary diagnosis, with 3440 associated deaths.

    We felt that several of these reflected conditions that were not primarily infective in nature

    (or at least in which antibiotics would not be a main component of acute management)

    We removed the most common of these.

    11. N12.X - Tubulo-interstitial nephritis, not specified as acute or chronic

    13. J69.0 - Pneumonitis due to food and vomit

    54. N10.X - Acute tubulo-interstitial nephritis

    62. J84.9 - Interstitial pulmonary disease, unspecified

    73. N71.9 - Inflammatory disease of uterus, unspecified

    86. K57.1 - Diverticular disease of small intestine without perforation or abscess

    90. N48.1 - Balanoposthitis

    99. N48.2 - Other inflammatory disorders of penis

    130. J69.8 - Pneumonitis due to other solids and liquids

    The remaining 258 codes had 45521 cases with 3163 associated deaths.

    95% of cases are captured using the first 76 diagnostic codes.

    We felt that many of the cases reflected infections that...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.