Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Social epidemiology of hypertension in Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality (BCMM): cross-sectional study of determinants of prevalence, awareness, treatment and control among South African adults
  1. Eyitayo Omolara Owolabi1,
  2. Daniel Ter Goon1,
  3. Oladele Vincent Adeniyi2,
  4. Eunice Seekoe1
  1. 1Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Fort Hare, East London, South Africa
  2. 2Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University/Cecilia Makiwane Hospital, East London Hospital Complex, East London, South Africa
  1. Correspondence to Eyitayo Omolara Owolabi; owolabiomolara101{at}gmail.com and Dr Oladele Vincent Adeniyi; vincoladele{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Objectives This study examined hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment and control and their determinants among adults attending health facilities in Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality (BCMM) in the Eastern Cape.

Design A cross-sectional analytical study.

Settings The three largest outpatient clinics in BCMM.

Participants Ambulatory adults (aged 18 years and over) attending the study settings during the study period (n=998).

Primary outcome measure The prevalence of hypertension (systolic blood pressure (BP) of ≥140 mm Hg and/or a diastolic BP of ≥90 mm Hg or current medication for hypertension), the awareness of it (prior diagnosis of it) and its treatment and control (Eighth Joint National Committee Criteria of BP <140/90/90 mm Hg).

Secondary outcome measure Associated factors of hypertension, hypertension unawareness and uncontrolled hypertension.

Results Of the 998 participants included, the prevalence of hypertension was 49.2%. Hypertension unawareness was reported by 152 participants (23.1%) with significant gender difference (p=0.005). Male sex, age <45 years, higher level of education, single status, current employment, higher monthly income, current smoking, alcohol usage, absence of diabetes and non-obese were significantly associated (p<0.05) with hypertension unawareness.

Of the participants who were aware of having hypertension (n=339), nearly all (91.7%, n=311) were on antihypertensive medication and only 121 participants (38.9%) achieved the BP treatment target. In the multivariate logistic regression model analysis, ageing (95% CI 1.9 to 4.4), being married (95% CI 1.0 to 2.0), male sex (95% CI 1.2 to 2.3), concomitant diabetes (95% CI 1.9 to 3.9), lower monthly income (95% CI 1.2 to 2.2), being unemployed (95% CI 1.0 to 1.9) and central obesity (95% CI 1.5 to 2.8) were the significant and independent determinants of prevalent hypertension.

Conclusion The prevalence and awareness of hypertension was high in the study population. In addition, the suboptimal control of BP among treated individuals, as well as the significant cardiovascular risk factors, warrant the attention of health authorities of BCMM and the country.

  • Blood Pressure Control
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Hypertension
  • Obesity
  • South Africa

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors EOO, DTG and OVA conceptualised, designed and drafted the paper. ES participated in data collection and gave intellectual contribution into the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

  • Funding EOO received master’s study grants from the National Research Foundation and the Health and Welfare Sector Education and Training Authority, South Africa towards the implementation of the project.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Ethics approval University of Fort Hare Ethics Committee.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement Data from this study will be made available on request.

  • Correction notice This paper has been amended since it was published Online First. Owing to a scripting error, some of the publisher names in the references were replaced with 'BMJ Publishing Group'. This only affected the full text version, not the PDF. We have since corrected these errors and the correct publishers have been inserted into the references.