Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Perceived challenges to achieving universal health coverage: a cross-sectional survey of social health insurance managers/administrators in China
  1. Linghan Shan1,
  2. Qunhong Wu1,
  3. Chaojie Liu2,
  4. Ye Li3,
  5. Yu Cui1,
  6. Zi Liang1,
  7. Yanhua Hao1,
  8. Libo Liang1,
  9. Ning Ning1,
  10. Ding Ding1,
  11. Qingxia Pan1,
  12. Liyuan Han4
  1. 1 Department of Social Medicine, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China
  2. 2 School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
  3. 3 Department of Health Policy and Hospital Management, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China
  4. 4 Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medical, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang province, China
  1. Correspondence to Professor Qunhong Wu; wuqunhong{at}163.com and Libo Liang; llbhit{at}163.com

Abstract

Objective China has achieved over 96% health insurance coverage. However, universal health coverage (UHC) entails population coverage and the range of services covered and the extent to which health service costs are covered. This study aimed to determine the performance of the health insurance system in China in terms of its role in UHC and to identify challenges in the progress of UHC as perceived by health insurance managers/administrators.

Methods A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted in Beijing, Ningbo, Harbin and Chongqing over the period of 2014 and 2015. A stratified cluster random sampling strategy was adopted to select study participants. A total of 1277 (64.8%) respondents who reported familiarity with the current health insurance system and the requirements of UHC provided valid data for analyses. They gave a rating on the role of the current health insurance system in achieving UHC. A multivariate logistic regression model was developed to determine the associations between the rating and the features of insurance arrangements.

Results There was consensus among the respondents on the performance of the current health insurance system in terms of its role in UHC, regardless who they were and what responsibility they held in their organisation (ie, policy development, managing fund transactions, and so on). Overall, about 45% of the respondents believed that there is a long way to go to achieve UHC. The low rating was found to be associated with limited financial protection (OR=1.656, 95% CI 1.279 to 2.146), healthcare inequity (OR=1.607, 95% CI 1.268 to 2.037), poor portability (OR=1.347, 95% CI 1.065 to 1.703) and ineffective supervision and administration of funds (OR=1.339, 95% CI 1.061 to 1.692) as perceived by the respondents.

Conclusion Health insurance managers/administrators in China are pessimistic about the achievements of the current health insurance system. They are concerned about the overall lack of benefit that insurance programmes bring to members, including low levels of entitlements, large healthcare inequity, limited financial protection and poor portability. A singular amendment of the structural design of the existing funds may not be enough to offer a satisfactory solution to these identified barriers. There is a need to increase funding capacities, to develop unified and consistent policies and to increase the level of fund pooling.

  • Universal Health Coverage
  • Social health insurance
  • China

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors Conceived and designed the study: QW, LL, YH and LS. Collected the data: LS, QW, LL, ZL, YC, YH, NN, YL, DD, QP and LH. Analysed the data: LS, ZL and YC. Wrote the manuscript: LS, ZL and YC. Revised the manuscript: LS, QW, LL, CL, ZL and YL. LS, ZL and YC contributed equally.

  • Funding This work was supported by the National Natural Science Fund (71333003, 71403073).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement No additional unpublished data are available.

  • Correction notice This paper has been amended since it was published Online First. Owing to a scripting error, some of the publisher names in the references were replaced with 'BMJ Publishing Group'. This only affected the full text version, not the PDF. We have since corrected these errors and the correct publishers have been inserted into the references.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.