Objectives The primary objective of the study was to investigate how patterns of skin-to-skin care might impact infant early cognitive and communication performance.
Design This was a retrospective cohort study.
Setting This study took place in a level-IV all-referral neonatal intensive care unit in the Midwest USA specialising in the care of extremely preterm infants.
Participants Data were collected from the electronic medical records of all extremely preterm infants (gestational age <27 weeks) admitted to the unit during 2010–2011 and who completed 6-month and 12-month developmental assessments in the follow-up clinic (n=97).
Outcome measures Outcome measures included the cognitive and communication subscales of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Third Edition (Bayley-III); and skin-to-skin patterns including: total hours of maternal and paternal participation throughout hospitalisation, total duration in weeks and frequency (hours per week).
Analysis Extracted data were analysed through a multistep process of logistic regressions, t-tests, χ2 tests and Fisher's exact tests followed with exploratory network analysis using novel visual analytic software.
Results Infants who received above the sample median in total hours, weekly frequency and total hours from mothers and fathers of skin-to-skin care were more likely to score ≥80 on the cognitive and communication scales of the Bayley-III. However, the results were not statistically significant (p>0.05). Mothers provided the majority of skin-to-skin care with a sharp decline at 30 weeks corrected age, regardless of when extremely preterm infants were admitted. Additional exploratory network analysis suggests that medical and skin-to-skin factors play a parallel, non-synergistic role in contributing to early cognitive and communication performance as assessed through the Bayley-III.
Conclusions This study suggests an association between early and frequent skin-to-skin care with extremely preterm infants and early cognitive and communication performance.
- extreme prematurity
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Strengths and limitations of this study
Identifies natural, emergent patterns of skin-to-skin care with extremely preterm infants to reflect authentic human engagement experiences.
Uses the evidence to suggest ways to target specific intervention areas for increasing skin-to-skin care.
Supports current literature on the longer term benefits of skin-to-skin care.
Uses one instrument to assess early cognitive and communication performance.
Uses retrospective data which exclude variables known to impact neonatal neurodevelopment.
The birth and subsequent hospitalisation of an extremely preterm infant is a trauma event. Unlike term infants, extremely preterm infants (infants born at <27 weeks) spend the last trimester of their gestation ex utero, in an artificial, technology-laden neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) that places them at a developmental disadvantage. Monitors, tubing and wires often create an environment that makes it difficult for authentic positive human interaction. In response, skin-to-skin care (SSC) has been incorporated into many NICUs across the world to re-establish this positive human contact.
SSC is the practice of holding an infant upright on a parent's chest in a manner that provides maximum bare skin ventral contact. The practice impacts infant physiological stability, stress and sleep as well as maternal stress and parenting behaviour. SSC studies over the last 25 years1–15 have collectively translated into a global acknowledgement that SSC is medically safe and significantly affects longer term neurodevelopmental cognitive, social and emotional outcomes.16–22
Despite the benefits of SSC, it is often difficult to engage some families in the practice. Findings from one of the most recent and comprehensive systematic reviews of the barriers and promoters of SSC (included in the complete package known as Kangaroo Mother Care)23 identified over 35 factors involved in integrating SSC into the NICU environment. The top three barriers to SSC were issues with the NICU physical facility, negative impressions by the staff about the practice and fear of injuring the infant during SSC. In contrast, SSC increased when mothers felt attached to their infants, felt confident in their parenting role and received support from family, friends or other mothers. While current studies, such as those found in the systematic review, can help in the design of new interventions promoting SSC, many are a reflection of participating in a highly supported and scrutinised form of SSC rather than parent practice as it naturally occurs in the NICU.
What remains unknown is how parents are actually engaging in the practice of SSC in an all-referral NICU setting in the USA when they are not involved in an SSC study. A rigorous study of routine SSC across a cohort of extremely preterm infants could identify specific strategies and intervention points for care providers to target their efforts at increasing parental engagement in SSC. Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to identify the naturalistic patterns of SSC that parents engage in with their extremely preterm infants in an all-referral NICU and investigate how these patterns impact early infant cognitive and communicative performance. A secondary aim was to compare the relative effects of amount and intensity of SSC on these outcomes.
Patients and methods
This study was a retrospective cohort study of all infants admitted to the Small Baby Intensive Care Unit (SBICU) at Nationwide Children's Hospital (NCH) between 1 January 2010 and 30 November 2011. The SBICU is a specialised level-IV all-referral unit staffed by a centralised team of nurses who provide protocol-driven care23–25 to neonates born at a gestational age (GA) <27 completed weeks. These protocols, organised within the Small Baby Guidelines, outline how to specifically address the medical and developmental needs of extremely preterm infants. SSC is specifically designated as a critical practice for medical stability and neurodevelopmental outcomes and is described as a care piece that should be strongly encouraged whenever possible, as long as possible. All patients cared for in this unit are outborn and are transported to the SBICU for care of complications of prematurity including necrotising enterocolitis, sepsis, surgical issues, brain injury and so on.
Retrospective data were extracted from the electronic medical record within three categories: (a) medical (b) SSC and (c) cognitive and communication outcomes at follow-up. Medical record information extracted for each patient included gender, GA, birth weight (BW), length of hospital stay (LOS), occurrence or absence of intraventricular haemorrhage in the brain (IVH), number of days on a ventilator (IPPV days), days until first full feed by mouth (PO DOL), whether the patient was a twin, triplet, etc (multiple births), and whether the patient received antenatal steroids. These variables were selected based on the outcome trajectories calculator developed by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network.26 Total hours of SSC for each parent were recorded for each day after the baby was admitted to the NICU until discharge. Hours were documented by the nursing staff in the patient medical record. (Audits performed comparing parental report and nurse report of SSC time indicated 89% consistency.) Summary measures of SSC use included total hours of SSC, the number of days between the day of admission and the first onset of SSC, total hours of SSC performed by the mother and father, intensity of SSC (average days of SSC per week) and whether the family participated in SSC after their child reached 33 weeks corrected age, a critical period of auditory development.27 To reduce the number of tested associations and aid in clinical interpretation, families were further classified as having a ‘high’ level of SSC participation if they were above the median in total hours, total hours for mother and total hours for father, and frequency of SSC (ie, above the median for each of the four variables). The remaining families were classified as having a ‘low’ level of SSC participation.
Cognitive and communication early performance outcomes were determined through the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Third Edition (Bayley-III), a valid and reliable developmental assessment tool that is widely used in neonatal follow-up. Assessments were performed at 6 and 12 months by licensed professionals certified and trained in the tool28 and scores were adjusted for prematurity. Descriptive classifications were used according to the protocol outlined by Pearson Clinical with infants scoring <80 being described as ‘Borderline’ for developmental disability.29 Consequently, scores were treated as continuous variables and as dichotomised variables of scores <80 and scores ≥80.
Statistical analysis was divided into three parts to address the clinical questions of interest. First, since the study is observational in nature, patterns of SSC participation (‘high’ vs ‘low’, as defined in the ‘Data’ section) were investigated graphically and associations between SSC measures and medical factors were tested. These associations were considered to explore for potential factors associated with SSC participation and to account for potential confounding of SSC with these other clinical/medical variables. A logistic regression model was fit to contrast the probability of being a high versus low SSC participant (as defined in the ‘Data’ section) as a function of gender, GA, BW, IVH, IPPV days, PO DOL, multiple births and receipt of antenatal steroids. Backwards elimination was used to select a final explanatory model based on minimising the Akaike's information criteria. Second, the association between SSC participation (high vs low) and Bayley-III scores was evaluated. Strength of association between raw Bayley scores and SSC participation (high vs low) was quantified and tested using point biserial correlations (rpb, tested against a null that the correlation was zero). Bayley scores dichotomised at the borderline disability level (<80 vs ≥80) were tested for association with SSC participation using the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test. Associations between dichotomised Bayley scores and SSC participation were additionally adjusted for confounding based on the medical factors found to be associated with SSC participation.
Patterns between medical factors and SSC became evident and patterns of SSC and the Bayley-III scores became evident. Consequently, for the final analysis, we used our StickWRLD visual analytic software30 ,31 to investigate potential triangulations among specific aspects of medical factors, SSC and the Bayley-III scores. All factors were loaded into the StickWRLD visual framework and initial two-node association patterns were set with an initial residual value32 of 0.2. Subsequent analyses were performed incrementally at lower residual values to identify and compare associative relationships and to search for significant emerging triangular data patterns. Analyses concluded when the model reached a threshold residual value corresponding to visual associative overload.
A total of 97 NICU patients were included in the study. The GA ranged from 22 to 26 weeks with an overall median of 25 weeks. Summary statistics of SSC usage (overall participation, participation by parent, SSC intensity and onset of SSC) are given in table 1. Mothers represented the majority of overall SSC participation, as evidenced by figure 1. Nine families were missing information on some aspect of SSC involvement. Among the remaining 88 families, 30 (34%) were classified as ‘high’ participants in SSC (above the median for total SSC hours, hours per parent and SSC intensity) while the other 58 (66%) were classified as ‘low’ participation in SSC.
Patterns of intensity and total hours of SSC participation between the postmenstrual ages of 23 and 40 weeks are displayed on a study-wide (total person-hours per week, figure 2) and family (hours per family per week, figure 3) basis. There was a steady increase in total hours and hours per family until about 30 weeks, after which there was a corresponding precipitous decline until 40 weeks. Differences in medical factors between families with high versus low SSC participation are given in table 2. Receipt of antenatal steroids was the only significant (p<0.05) finding, with 71% of children from families with high SSC participation receiving antenatal steroids and 91% of children with low family SSC participation receiving them.
These factors (minus LOS, which was omitted because infants with longer LOS might be expected to have longer total SSC duration) were subsequently used to build a model to analyse the variance in SSC participation based on logistic regression with backwards elimination. The resulting model included antenatal steroids, BW and IVH as predictors (table 3). We investigated various cut-points for dichotomising BW and found the 75th centile to provide the best fit. Receipt of antenatal steroids (OR=0.136) and BW in the top quartile (OR=0.152) were associated with reduced odds of high SSC participation, while presence of IVH was associated with increased odds (OR=1.92).
Next, association between SSC participation and cognitive and communication outcomes (Bayley scores) at follow-up were investigated. Figure 4 displays boxplots of the Bayley scores stratified by high and low SSC participation, while table 4 gives mean values for each examination by participation group. Communication scores at 12 months were somewhat higher in the high SSC group (p=0.05). We then dichotomised the Bayley score at the borderline disability level (<80 vs ≥80). Table 5 displays the number and percentage of patients that fall below this borderline disability level along with univariate ORs. To account for potential confounding, ORs were further adjusted by fitting a multivariable model including the factors identified to be associated with SSC participation (BW, antenatal steroids and IVH, table 5). None of the associations (except for cognitive examination at 6 months) reached statistical significance. However, there was a relatively consistent OR of 2 for associations between each dichotomised Bayley score and SSC participation in the multivariable models. Adjusted ORs were higher than the unadjusted because SSC participation was associated with factors that were also generally associated with lower Bayley scores.
A final exploratory analysis of the data set was performed using StickWRLD software to identify possible emergent interactive network associations among SSC measures, medical factors and Bayley-III scores. Network displays (figure 5) indicated separate, but convergent significant associations between SSC measures and medical factors and the 12-month Bayley-III cognitive scores.
Engagement in SSC with extremely preterm infants in the NICU varies among families. However, SSC patterns are evident in this population and potentially have an impact on early cognitive and communication performance. These findings are not new in that numerous studies11–22 have been devoted to the short-term and long-term developmental benefits of SSC. What is initially novel about our findings is that we have found a strong indication that SSC before 30 weeks postmenstrual age may play a role in the cognitive and communication development of extremely preterm infants. The period of time before 32 weeks is often considered a developmentally marginal time period in communication and language development. Underlying brain structure and auditory/visual development are not at full capacity33 and preterm infants are not yet prepared to vocalise or discern formal speech sounds.34 ,35 However, studies in neurobiology indicate that social development does occur during this time36–39 and could possibly represent an early foundational stage in the developmental continuum of communication and language.
A second novel finding is that extremely preterm infants, who had higher BWs, had received antenatal steroids and who did not have IVH, were at decreased odds of receiving a ‘high’ level of SSC (where high level was defined as above the median for total hours, frequency and hours for each parent). One possible explanation is that infants who were perceived as being ‘less sick’ were at reduced odds of receiving a high level of SSC. This poses questions about how medical caregivers and parents perceive the practice of SSC and how developmental information is being communicated between parents and the medical team.
Finally, our findings identify a concerning gap in SSC from 30 weeks corrected age to term age. Numerous studies highlight the essential nature of this time period for appropriate neurodevelopment.40–44 However, extremely preterm infants, who represent one of the highest risk categories for neurodevelopmental disability, are not receiving an SSC intervention shown to improve neurodevelopment at a fundamental time point of their developmental trajectory. This elicits additional questions about why parents choose to stop at this corrected age, the underlying mechanisms of communication development in this population and the potential added dimensional role of SSC as a communication intervention in the NICU.
One important limitation of our study is that it is retrospective in nature within an all-referral hospital system in the USA, which impedes our ability to capture and analyse additional factors shown to impact neonatal neurodevelopment. Consequently, we could not explore the effects of maternal health, socioeconomic status or education, which are shown to significantly influence neonatal developmental outcome. However, the intent of our study was to investigate if patterns of parental skin-to-skin behaviour should be considered in the overall discussion of mesosystemic variables contributing to longer term outcomes.
The study is also limited by sample size and possible confounding, which is inherently an issue when investigating associations. However as noted previously, NICU patients receiving SSC were actually associated with medical factors that were in turn associated with lower early-stage cognitive and communication scores. The study is also based on patients from a single hospital, and may not generalise to other neonatal units, especially because our unit is a level-4 all-referral unit with high-acuity infants and geographically distant parents. While we did see a relatively consistent pattern of association (c.f. table 5) between high/low SSC participation and the Bayley-III Cognitive and Communication Outcomes dichotomised at borderline disability (<80 vs ≥80), we reiterate that none of these associations achieved statistical significance and thus can only be viewed as suggestive results in need of confirmatory analysis. If the observed associations were to hold in the population along with the same level of SSC participation and prevalence of borderline disability, then roughly 460 total subjects would be needed to achieve 80% power to detect the association in a larger study.
Our research suggests that developmental investigation into very early time points in the life of extremely preterm infants that incorporates medical and behavioural components is warranted and critical to understanding how to fully optimise future developmental social and cognitive processes. Further prospective studies, involving more comprehensive measures and analyses of the early developmental NICU environment (22–40 weeks postmenstrual age), could help inform new designs for developmental caregiving and promotion of SSC throughout the duration of hospitalisation.
We would like to thank Dr Leif Nelin and the Small Baby Program for their continual advocacy and advancement towards the highest standard of developmentally appropriate care of extremely preterm infants.
Contributors All authors contributed equally to this manuscript. JG and GB designed and conducted the study, analysed the biostatistical portion, and wrote and reviewed manuscript drafts. JG, WCR and RWR performed visual analytics, wrote sections of the manuscript, and reviewed and refined manuscript drafts.
Funding This project was supported by award number UL1TR001070 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences.
Disclaimer The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences or the National Institutes of Health.
Competing interests None declared.
Ethics approval This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Nationwide Children's Hospital (IRB#13-00042) as an expedited study that meets the criteria for waiver of authorisation.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement Data are stored on our internal, high-security server. De-identified data set is available on request.