Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Characteristics and prognoses of patients treated by an anaesthesiologist-manned prehospital emergency care unit. A retrospective cohort study
  1. Søren Mikkelsen1,2,
  2. Hans Morten Lossius3,4,
  3. Palle Toft2,5,
  4. Annmarie Touborg Lassen2,6
  1. 1Mobile Emergency Care Unit, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine V, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
  2. 2Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
  3. 3Field of Prehospital Critical Care, Network for Medical Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
  4. 4Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Drøbak, Norway
  5. 5Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine V, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
  6. 6Department of Emergency Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
  1. Correspondence to Dr Søren Mikkelsen; soeren.mikkelsen{at}


Objective When planning and dimensioning an emergency medical system, knowledge of the population serviced is vital. The amount of literature concerning the prehospital population is sparse. In order to add to the current body of literature regarding prehospital treatment, thus aiding future public health planning, we describe the workload of a prehospital anaesthesiologist-manned mobile emergency care unit (MECU) and the total population it services in terms of factors associated with mortality.

Participants The study is a register-based study investigating all missions carried out by a MECU operating in a mixed urban/rural area in Denmark from 1 May 2006 to 31 December 2014. Information on missions was extracted from the local MECU registry and linked at the individual level to the Danish population-based databases, the National Patient Registry and the Civil Registration System.

Primary and secondary outcome measures Primary outcome measures were number of missions and number of patient contacts. Secondary patient variables were mortality and association between mortality and age, sex, comorbidity, prior admission to hospital and response time.

Results The MECU completed 41 513 missions (mean 13.1 missions/day) having 32 873 patient contacts, corresponding to 19.2 missions and 15.2 patient encounters per 1000 patient years. Patient variables: the median age was 57 years (range 0–108 years), 42.8% (42.3% to 43.4%) were women. For patients admitted to hospital alive, 30-day mortality was 5.7% (5.4% to 6.0%); 90-day mortality was 8.1% (7.8% to 8.5%) while 2-year mortality was 16.4% (16.0% to 16.8%). Increasing age, male sex, comorbidity and prior admission to hospital but not response time were associated with mortality.

Conclusions Mortality following an incident requiring the assistance of a MECU was high in the first 2 years following the incident. MECU response time assessed as a continuous parameter was not associated with patient outcome.

  • Prehospital Emergency Care
  • Prehospital cohort
  • Mobile Emergency Care Unit

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See:

View Full Text

Statistics from


  • Contributors SM and ATL contributed to this manuscript with idea and design as well as acquisition of data, analysis of data and drafting and revising of the manuscript. HML and PT contributed to this manuscript with idea, design, drafting and revision of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

  • Funding This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency ( 2014-41-3305) and the Danish Health and Medicines Agency ( 3-3013-682/1/).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement No additional data are available.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.