Article info

This article has a correction. Please see:

Download PDFPDF

Perineal resuturing versus expectant management following vaginal delivery complicated by a dehisced wound (PREVIEW): a pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial

Authors

  • L Dudley The Maternity Centre, Royal Stoke, University Hospitals of North Midlands, Staffordshire, UK Faculty of Health, Staffordshire University, Stafford, UK Faculty of Health Sciences, Professor Emerita of Women's Health, Staffordshire University, Stafford, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • C Kettle Faculty of Health Sciences, Professor Emerita of Women's Health, Staffordshire University, Stafford, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • P W Thomas Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Professor of Health Care Statistics and Epidemiology, Bournemouth University Clinical Research Unit, Bournemouth University, Dorset, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • K M K Ismail Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  1. Correspondence to Professor K M K Ismail; k.ismail{at}bham.ac.uk
View Full Text

Citation

Dudley L, Kettle C, Thomas PW, et al
Perineal resuturing versus expectant management following vaginal delivery complicated by a dehisced wound (PREVIEW): a pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial

Publication history

  • Received May 22, 2016
  • Revised August 1, 2016
  • Accepted September 21, 2016
  • First published February 10, 2017.
Online issue publication 
February 10, 2017

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.