Responses

PDF

Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Figure clarification and data correction from the authors
    • Kathryn A. Kaiser, Assistant Professor University of Alabama at Birmingham
    • Other Contributors:
      • Andrew W. Brown, Assistant Professor

    Readers of our article have indicated that the description of Figure 1 was insufficient to help them understand what it represents. Below, we further describe the figure, correct two minor errors, and provide a summary table.

    Figure 1 description:
    Figure 1 was designed to show two overarching pieces of information. First, the line plots allow the reader to see how the filtering process progresses for individual studies. Each line represents a single study going from one phase to the next. Each phase is centered on the midpoint of the range, giving it a Buchner funnel-like shape. The purpose of this representation, as opposed to having the x-axis anchored to 0 for instance, is that it better highlights the rank changes across phases. Just because a study has a large number of papers at one phase does not mean that it will have the largest number included at a subsequent phase, and this difference can sometimes be pronounced (as evidenced by steeply crossing lines).The second piece of information was summary statistics represented in boxplots overlaid at each phase, which are more self-explanatory.

    Figure 1 data processing:
    For the lineplots, four studies were excluded because their values were greater than 2.5 standard deviations above the mean for the ‘Total N Found’ variable. Had these four studies been plotted, all other lines would have been compressed to the left of the figure because of how far these four values would have extended the axis...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.