You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 7, Issue 10
  • Comparison of two methods to estimate adverse events in the IBEAS Study (Ibero-American study of adverse events): cross-sectional versus retrospective cohort design

Citation Tools

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

XML
Public health
Research
Comparison of two methods to estimate adverse events in the IBEAS Study (Ibero-American study of adverse events): cross-sectional versus retrospective cohort design

Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Cite this article as:
Aranaz Andrés JM, Limón Ramírez R, Aibar Remón C, et al
Comparison of two methods to estimate adverse events in the IBEAS Study (Ibero-American study of adverse events): cross-sectional versus retrospective cohort design
BMJ Open 2017;7:e016546. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016546