Objectives An increasing trend in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes has been observed among youths; however, little is known about how informed young people are of its existence and dangers. This study is to assess the level of knowledge on type 2 diabetes among Chinese college students and to explore related factors influencing the knowledge.
Setting A cross-sectional survey was conducted among college students in Guangzhou, China, from September to November 2013.
Participants A total of 658 students were randomly recruited using a multistage sampling method and were invited to participate in the confidential interviews.
Primary and secondary outcome measures Self-reported knowledge on diabetes and its main sources were measured by a self-designed questionnaire.
Results A total of 521 students participated in this study. The mean total score of knowledge was 13.3±3.44 of 22. Less than 50% of participants could correctly answer the questions about the onset of type 2 diabetes, the adverse effects of sedentary lifestyles, the complications, the therapeutic methods and the monitoring index of diabetes. The factors associated with higher levels of knowledge about type 2 diabetes in stepwise regression models were: being in a high grade, having a better academic performance, having a medical specialty and having relatives or friends with diabetes. Newspapers and books (61.4%), television and the Internet (46.3%) were the major sources of knowledge about type 2 diabetes, and more than half of the participants (55.9%) considered that medical staff was the most reliable source.
Conclusions The college students had limited knowledge about type 2 diabetes. Public education, especially among individuals with non-medical specialties, a low-level grade, poor academic performance or no relatives and friends with diabetes, would be extremely beneficial.
- PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
- PUBLIC HEALTH
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Strengths and limitations of this study
To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the first studies to systematically assess the level of knowledge on type 2 diabetes from five respects and the potential-related factors influencing the knowledge among Chinese college students.
The results can provide evidence in developing health education programmes for young adults to face the challenge of increasing trend of diabetes to be younger.
The level of knowledge might be overestimated due to the nature of a higher rate of rejection and self-reported data.
Diabetes is a major, non-communicable disease with increasing prevalence globally1 and will be the seventh leading cause of death worldwide by 2030 as estimated by the WHO report in 2011.2 Type 2 diabetes affects the most productive midlife period but has also started to appear in younger age groups.3 Type 2 diabetes is now increasingly diagnosed among adolescents and young adults, but it is a potentially preventable disease through a combination of lifestyle modification and pharmaceutical treatment.4–6 Adopting a healthy lifestyle, including healthy diet choices and exercise habits, plays a critical role in the prevention and control of type 2 diabetes and has been associated with lower risk of type 2 diabetes.1 ,7 ,8 Knowledge forms a basis for the adoption of good health-related practices and these lifestyle changes at the time of youth facilitate maintenance throughout a person's life.9 ,10 Hence, it is crucial that young people could be well informed about the preventive measures of type 2 diabetes, its risk factors, complications and therapeutic methods.
However, except for some studies conducted among medical students,11–13 Scare studies have evaluated the diabetic knowledge among college students. A study conducted among university students in Ajman in the United Arab Emirates have shown that the participants' level of type 2 diabetes-related knowledge, especially the fact that type 2 diabetes can be prevented or delayed, was not adequate10 Another study, which included college students in public schools in Morelos, Central Mexico, also showed that the participants had low levels of knowledge about type 2 diabetes diagnoses and prevention.14 Given the differences in socioeconomics and culture across different countries, the purpose of this study was to assess type 2 diabetes-related knowledge, including general knowledge, risk factors, clinical-related knowledge and some potential factors influencing this knowledge among Chinese college students. The results of this study, by identifying areas of knowledge deficiency and some influencing factors, can assist in developing health education programmes for young adults.
Materials and methods
The cross-sectional study was conducted among college students in Guangzhou, China, from September to November 2013. The participants were recruited by multistage sampling methods. First, 8 of 16 colleges were randomly sampled. Second, three classes were sampled from each of the eight colleges. Third, about 30 students were sampled in every selected class. Finally, a total of 658 college students enrolled in confidential interviews. Of them, 79 refused to participate in this study due to lack of interest and 579 returned their questionnaires to the trained investigators, with 521 of 579 supposedly valid ones (valid questionnaire referred to missing items less than four ones). According to the target significance level of 0.05, a tested rate of awareness of 45% (referred to the reported rate 45.81% in Chinese adults (17)), a sample size of 500 achieves 99.5% power to detect a difference of 0.10 using a two-sided binomial test.
A structured questionnaire with closed-ended questions was developed after an extensive literature search and consulting experts. The questionnaire was pretested with a group of 15 college students to identify any problems related to question design, flow or interpretation. Following that identified inconsistencies and inaccuracies were corrected. The reliability of the questionnaire was assessed by Cronbach's α coefficients with a value of 0.686 in this study.
After the investigators introduced the objective of the study and ways to fill in the questionnaires in detail, participants were required to answer the following questions using anonymous self-administered methods: (1)general characteristics (see table 1), including sex, specialty, grade, academic performance self-assessment, the habit of eating breakfast, sleep time and frequency of taking physical activity, self-reported height and weight, and having relatives and/or friends with diabetes or not; (2) knowledge about type 2 diabetes, evaluated by 22 items (see table 2) including general knowledge (four items), risk factors (five items), symptoms (four items), complications (five items) and diagnosis and treatment (four items); and (3) sources of knowledge and the authoritative sources that they considered.
A scoring system was created by giving one score for each correct answer and a zero score for incorrect and uncertain answers. Questions that contained more than one correct answer were given one score for each correct answer. The total score ranged from 0 to 22.
Categorical variables were described by frequency, and continuous variables were described by means±SD and tested by analysis of variance. Stepwise linear regression models (p in <0.05, p out >0.10) were fitted to explore the factors influencing the level of diabetic knowledge.
All of the analyses were carried out using the SPSS statistical package (V.17.0, SPSS , Chicago, Illinois, USA), and a p value <0.05 (two-tailed) was considered to be significant.
In all, 173 men (33.2%) and 348 women (66.8%) were included in the final analysis. Among them, 228 (43.8%) were medical students and 293 (56.2%) were non-medical students. The number of students was 126, 138, 170 and 87 from college grades 1 to 4, respectively. More than 50% of the students were in the normal range of body mass index (BMI) (18.5–23.9 kg/m2) and only 2.9% were overweight and obese (BMI>24 kg/m215). Almost 60% reported taking physical activity <3 days/week. About one-third reported that either their relatives or their friends had been diagnosed with diabetes (see table 1).
Fewer students reported that they knew that diabetes is a non-acute onset disease (20.0%) and glycated haemoglobin is a better monitoring index of blood glucose fluctuations (11.9%). Over one-third reported that proper diet and exercise is the preferred treatment for diabetes (35.3%). Nearly one-third and one-fifth reported that eye problems (34.0%) and diabetic peripheral neuropathy (19.0%) are common diabetes-related complications. Half of the students thought that a sedentary lifestyle is associated with the risk of diabetes (48.6%) and more than 70% of students claimed that they knew the four typical symptoms of diabetes, including an excessive feeling of thirst, excessive eating, excessive urination and unexplained weight loss (see table 2).
Regarding the score of knowledge, women had a higher score than men, especially in the area of general knowledge and total score. Compared with the students who had a poor academic performance and had no diabetic relatives and friends, the students who reported having a good or better academic performance and had diabetic relatives and/or friends had higher scores in total scores and in the area of diabetic risk factors. Furthermore, the higher grades olders had higher scores than the lower grade youngsters. As expected, medical students had higher scores in almost all fields of diabetic knowledge than non-medical students. However, we found no association of BMI and lifestyle, including inactivity lifestyle and less sleep time, with diabetic knowledge (see table 1). The stepwise multivariable linear regression analysis showed that a higher grade, medical specialty, better academic performance and having relatives or friends with diabetes were the predictors for a higher total score of diabetic knowledge (see table 3).
Notably, the two major access areas to knowledge reported by students were via books and newspapers (61.4%) and TV and the Internet (46.3%). However, most of the students considered that the most authoritative access to knowledge was from medical staff (55.9%), followed by lectures and brochures (44.9%; see figure 1).
This study indicated that the college students had low levels of knowledge about type 2 diabetes with the rates of correct answers being <50% in the following areas: its chronic onset, sedentary lifestyles associated with the risk of diabetes, the monitoring index of blood glucose fluctuations, healthy dietary and exercise habits for treatment and its complications with eye problems and diabetic peripheral neuropathy. In addition, a higher grade, a medical specialty, better academic performance and having relatives or friends with diabetes were significantly associated with higher scores of knowledge regarding diabetes. Most important of all, 499 participants (95.8%) were really expected to acquire more knowledge regarding diabetes. Thus, health education and promotion activities should be developed as soon as possible by policymakers, healthcare providers and educators in the colleges.
In general, this study and the previous studies in other countries, including Oman, Ajman, USA and Mexico3 ,10 ,14 ,16 ,17 all showed that the overall diabetes-related knowledge level was low among the young people, so attempts to reduce the incidence of type 2 diabetes should include young people who are at an impressionable age and can be motivated to make healthy lifestyle modifications.3 Meanwhile, college students who were receiving a high education in the colleges had a mean score of diabetes only 59% of the maximum possible total score (ie, 13 points of 22), which was similar to the general population in this country. Recently, a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published from 1979 to 2012 in China's mainland showed that the pooled estimate for the awareness of diabetes was 45.81% and there was no obvious improvement in the awareness rate from 1998 to 2011 in the general population.18 The low awareness rate, independent of one person's level of educational, may be a result of ignoring the propaganda and education about diabetes for a long time in China. Given the total number of people with diabetes has doubled from 20.8 million in 2000 to 42.3 million in 2013 caused by the rapid socioeconomic development and changes in lifestyle,19 it is of equal importance to take urgent measures targeting colleges and communities to increase the general public's awareness of diabetes from a public health perspective.
Previous research has shown that 80% of type 2 diabetes cases can be prevented by ameliorating lifestyle, changing to a healthy diet and increasing one's physical activity. However, this study found that only 48.3% of participants recognised that sedentary lifestyles were associated with the increased risk of diabetes. The rate was similar to that reported among university students in Ajman, where 53% of participants did not know that decreased physical activity and bad diet were the major modifiable risk factors for the development of diabetes.10 At the same time, a lack of exercise was a serious concern, as only 40% of our study population claimed that they exercised more than 3 days per week. Moreover, even participants who took part in regular exercise did not have a significantly higher score of diabetic knowledge than those who did not exercise. Thus, these results suggested that it is necessary to further clarify the role of physical activity as a preventive measure for diabetes among college students.
The incidence and impact of diabetes-related complications on public health is alarming. Common complications include nephropathy, retinopathy, neuropathy, cardiovascular disease et al, which further contribute to a reduced quality of life.20 However, the level of knowledge regarding complications of diabetes among college students was low and the rates of awareness of diabetic peripheral neuropathy and eye problems were only 19% and 34%, respectively. The finding was consistent with a similar study conducted in Ajman.10 Another study about the knowledge, attitude and practice of final year medical students in Saudi Arabia on the topics of diabetes also suggested a lack of knowledge of diabetic retinopathy.13 So diabetes self-management education is required, that is, patients with diabetes should engage in lifestyle changes and should be strengthened among young people to reduce the risk of complications.
The key area of poor knowledge in this study was clinical knowledge about diabetes, including chronic onset (20%), preferred diet and exercise therapy (35.3%) and Hb1Ac as a better monitoring index (11.9%). The low level might be due to the fact that this knowledge was closely related to clinical medicine and could be strengthened by clinical practice. For example, a study among medical students of Ziauddin University has shown that the knowledge about diabetes was greater in the clinical group compared with the preclinical group.11 Despite that type 2 diabetes affects the most productive midlife period, it has also started to appear in younger age groups; thus, it is beneficial for college students to master related knowledge as early as possible to prevent, treat and control diabetes in the future. Moreover, college students who know about diabetes can be used as a medium of knowledge to influence diabetic awareness in the people around them, including their relatives and friends or patients with diabetes.
In this study, grade-differences, academic performance-differences and specialty-differences in diabetic knowledge were found. Not surprisingly, students who were at a higher grade had a good academic performance and those in a medical specialty had more knowledge about diabetes compared with other students. Furthermore, this study found that having relatives or friends with diabetes significantly increased the perceived risk of diabetes, which agreed with previous research.3 ,10 ,21 ,22 Additionally, gender was significantly associated with the level of knowledge in a univariate analysis. More female than male students had a general knowledge of diabetes, which was consistent with a study conducted among a college population in Ajman10 and a study among high school students in Oman.3 However, the gender-difference in diabetic knowledge was not significant in the stepwise linear regression analysis because of the collinearity of independent variables. For example, more female students reported having a relative or friends with diabetes (37.5%) compared with men (26.9%). Similarly, the collinearity of the independent variables existed when treating scores of knowledge of risk factors, symptoms, diagnosis and treatment as dependent variables, respectively. For example, 66.7% of medical students were from grades 3 and 4, in contrast to 35.8% of non-medical ones. So in this study, stepwise regression was used to select independent variables, partly avoiding incorrect estimates due to multicollinearity.
Notably, this study showed that the current major sources of information to gain knowledge regarding diabetes were inconsistent with the best mode to convey the information considered by the participants. Although 61.4% and 46.3% of participants received information about diabetes through books and newspapers, and the TV and Internet, respectively, more than 50% of the participants preferred to believe the information provided by health professionals. A study conducted among high school students in Oman also showed similar results in which 61% of the students preferred healthcare staff to provide the information, but the common sources of information were mass media and the school.3 This discordance might be due to the fact that false or exaggerated information appeared more often on the TV and the Internet and in newspapers rather than from other sources. Further, the feeling of mistrust of information from the TV, Internet and newspapers resulted in a lack of knowledge about diabetes among college students. Similarly, physicians were also the most highly trusted information source reported by 62.4% of adults in the Health Information National Trends Survey in USA16 Therefore, health professionals and their talks and seminars should be proposed as an effective mode to improve diabetes-related knowledge among college students.
Several limitations must be noted in this study. Although the participants were a randomly selected sample, 12% (79/658) declined to participate and 10% (58/579) provided an invalid questionnaire. Participants in this study may have been more health conscious than the students who were unwilling to complete the questionnaire, so the level of knowledge of the populations may have been overestimated in this study. Another limitation was the use of self-reported data and the assumption that participants responded honestly and accurately.
In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate that public education about the chronic progress of diabetes and its treatment and control measures, its complications and risk factors, such as unhealthy lifestyle, is a worthy public health goal in college students. Public education, especially among individuls with non-medical specialties, at a low-level grade, having poor academic performance and having no relatives and friends with diabetes, would be extremely beneficial. Future research should assess what the college students' attitudes and practices on diabetes are and whether some targeted educational programmes to increase awareness about type 2 diabetes to prevent and control the occurrence of diabetes are successful among college students.
The authors would like to thank the involved college teachers and research assistants for their help in the investigation, and also the participating college students for their time. All authors have no personal or financial conflicts of interest to declare.
YX, DZ contributed equally to this work and shared the first authorship.
Contributors Ying Xu has full access to the data and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Dongdong Zhang takes responsibility for the data collection and cleaning. Kaiqian Liu and Yanfang Guo assists in the design of questionnaire construction and Professor Yang takes full charge of the study design, supplying survey fields, data analysis and correcting manuscripts.
Funding This project was funded both by Guangdong Science and Technology Department (grant number: 2013B021800081, awarded to Ying Xu) and the Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China for Outstanding Young Teachers in University (grant number: 11YJCZH204, awarded to Ying Xu). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or in the preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Obtained.
Ethics approval The Institutional Review Board at Guangdong Pharmaceutical University.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement No additional data are available.