Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Utility of models to predict 28-day or 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions: an updated systematic review
  1. Huaqiong Zhou1,2,
  2. Phillip R Della2,
  3. Pamela Roberts2,
  4. Louise Goh2,
  5. Satvinder S Dhaliwal2
  1. 1Clinical Nurse, General Surgical Ward, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
  2. 2School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Professor Satvinder Dhaliwal; s.dhaliwal{at}curtin.edu.au

Abstract

Objective To update previous systematic review of predictive models for 28-day or 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions.

Design Systematic review.

Setting/data source CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE from 2011 to 2015.

Participants All studies of 28-day and 30-day readmission predictive model.

Outcome measures Characteristics of the included studies, performance of the identified predictive models and key predictive variables included in the models.

Results Of 7310 records, a total of 60 studies with 73 unique predictive models met the inclusion criteria. The utilisation outcome of the models included all-cause readmissions, cardiovascular disease including pneumonia, medical conditions, surgical conditions and mental health condition-related readmissions. Overall, a wide-range C-statistic was reported in 56/60 studies (0.21–0.88). 11 of 13 predictive models for medical condition-related readmissions were found to have consistent moderate discrimination ability (C-statistic ≥0.7). Only two models were designed for the potentially preventable/avoidable readmissions and had C-statistic >0.8. The variables ‘comorbidities’, ‘length of stay’ and ‘previous admissions’ were frequently cited across 73 models. The variables ‘laboratory tests’ and ‘medication’ had more weight in the models for cardiovascular disease and medical condition-related readmissions.

Conclusions The predictive models which focused on general medical condition-related unplanned hospital readmissions reported moderate discriminative ability. Two models for potentially preventable/avoidable readmissions showed high discriminative ability. This updated systematic review, however, found inconsistent performance across the included unique 73 risk predictive models. It is critical to define clearly the utilisation outcomes and the type of accessible data source before the selection of the predictive model. Rigorous validation of the predictive models with moderate-to-high discriminative ability is essential, especially for the two models for the potentially preventable/avoidable readmissions. Given the limited available evidence, the development of a predictive model specifically for paediatric 28-day all-cause, unplanned hospital readmissions is a high priority.

  • PUBLIC HEALTH
  • EPIDEMIOLOGY

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.