Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Clinical outcomes at 12 months and risk of inflammatory bowel disease in patients with an intermediate raised fecal calprotectin: a ‘real-world’ view
  1. Michael McFarlane1,
  2. Samantha Chambers1,
  3. Ahmad Malik1,
  4. Bee Lee2,
  5. Edmond Sung3,
  6. Chuka Nwokolo1,
  7. Norman Waugh4,
  8. Ramesh Arasaradnam1,5
  1. 1Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Coventry & Warwickshire, Coventry, UK
  2. 2Department of Gastroenterology, Warwick Hospital, Warwick, UK
  3. 3Department of Gastroenterology, George Eliot Hospital, Nuneaton, UK
  4. 4Department of Warwick Evidence, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
  5. 5Clinical Sciences Research Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor Ramesh Arasaradnam; r.arasaradnam{at}warwick.ac.uk

Abstract

Objectives A recent systematic review confirmed the usefulness of fecal calprotectin (FC) in distinguishing organic (inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)) from non-organic gastrointestinal disease (irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)). FC levels <50 μg/g have a negative predictive value >92% to exclude organic gastrointestinal (GI) disease. Levels >250 μg/g correlate with endoscopic IBD disease activity; sensitivity 90%. We aimed to determine clinical outcomes in intermediate raised FC results (50–250 μg/g).

Setting Primary care general practices in Coventry and Warwickshire, and 3 secondary care hospitals.

Participants 443 FC results in adults (>16 years old) were reviewed from July 2012 to October 2013. Clinical data was collected from hospital databases and general practitioners. Long-term clinical data was available in 41 patients (out of 48).

Primary and secondary outcome measures The number of new diagnoses of IBD, IBS and other diagnoses for the intermediate group. The number referred and discharged from secondary care.

Results A new IBD diagnosis was made in 19% (n=8) of intermediate results (1% of normal and 38% of raised results). 5% (n=2) of intermediate results had known IBD in remission. A new IBS diagnosis was made in 27% (n=11) of intermediate results, while 34% (n=14) remained undiagnosed, although 8 of these were not referred to secondary care.

Conclusions FC testing remains useful in aiding diagnosis of organic GI conditions. However, unlike negative and strongly positive FC results, intermediate FC results lead to a mixture of diagnoses. The OR of a new diagnosis of IBD for an intermediate result compared to normal FC result was 26.6, while an intermediate FC result gave an OR of 0.54 for a new IBS diagnosis compared to normal FC. For intermediate FC results, 1 in 3 patients remained in secondary care after 12 months with an OR of 3.6 compared to a normal FC result.

  • Faecal Calprotectin
  • Intermediate
  • Outcomes

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.