Responses

Download PDFPDF

Does attractiveness influence condom use intentions in heterosexual men? An experimental study
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

  • Published on:
    Dubious Noise Mining Used to Denigrate Genuine Medical Research

    I write because this study was cited by a rather offensive opinion piece published on the morning of April 21, 2022 in the Washington Post. While that opinion made no particular argument beyond a rather vague claim that research into hormonal contraceptives for men is without merit on the grounds that men have no interest in contraception, it did cite this study in support of the claim that "men are 'less likely' to wear a condom when they judge a partner to be attractive or in good health." While the relationship between this claim and the rest of the column is tenuous, it seems to me like a fair characterization of the study authors' conclusion.

    However, on reading the study, I have difficulty trusting even that claim. My concern is that this study looks like little more than noise-mining: questionable data with superficial resemblance to the purported research question, hammered with a grab-bag of statistical techniques for significant-seeming results with an arguable relationship to the researchers' conclusion. I should admit here at the outset that I do not have the statistical background to give an in-depth critique of the mathematical analysis of the results. Still, there are certain numerical hallmarks that lead me to question the confidence that any conclusion about men in general can be drawn from these data.

    - First, the sample size in this study is absurdly small. As a rough metric, we can observe some quirks in the d...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Commentary on: Does attractiveness influence condom use intentions in heterosexual men? An experimental study.

    Evan S. Herrmann1, Patrick S. Johnson2, and Matthew W. Johnson3

    1Division on Substance Abuse, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons

    2Department of Psychology, California State University, Chico

    3Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

    In...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.