You are here

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

XML
Evidence based practice
Research
Dietary flavonoid intake and the risk of stroke: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies
  1. Zhenyu Tang,
  2. Min Li,
  3. Xiaowei Zhang,
  4. Wenshang Hou
  1. Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, People's Republic of China
  1. Correspondence to Dr Zhenyu Tang; zytang07016{at}sina.com

Abstract

Objective To clarify and quantify the potential association between intake of flavonoids and risk of stroke.

Design Meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.

Data source Studies published before January 2016 identified through electronic searches using PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library.

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Prospective cohort studies with relative risks and 95% CIs for stroke according to intake of flavonoids (assessed as dietary intake).

Results The meta-analysis yielded 11 prospective cohort studies involving 356 627 participants and more than 5154 stroke cases. The pooled estimate of the multivariate relative risk of stroke for the highest compared with the lowest dietary flavonoid intake was 0.89 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.97; p=0.006). Dose-response analysis indicated that the summary relative risk of stroke for an increase of 100 mg flavonoids consumed per day was 0.91 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.08) without heterogeneity among studies (I2=0%). Stratifying by follow-up duration, the relative risk of stroke for flavonoid intake was 0.89 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.99) in studies with more than 10 years of follow-up.

Conclusions Results from this meta-analysis suggest that higher dietary flavonoid intake may moderately lower the risk of stroke.

  • STROKE MEDICINE
  • NEUROLOGY
  • PUBLIC HEALTH

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008680

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Strengths and limitations of this study

    • This is the largest meta-analysis to date on flavonoid intake and risk of stroke.

    • Higher dietary flavonoid intake is associated with a significantly reduced risk of stroke.

    • Dose-response analyses indicated a 9% lower risk of stroke per 100 mg/day increment in flavonoids.

    • The possibility of residual confounding or confounding by unmeasured factors, which cannot be ruled out in any observational study, must be acknowledged.

    • We cannot exclude the possibility of recall bias in the assessments of diet based on food frequency questionnaires.

    Introduction

    Stroke is the second most common cause of death, as well as the fourth leading cause of lost productivity and the second highest cause of disability worldwide.1 ,2 Prevention of stroke is thus clearly an important public health priority. In recent decades, concern has mounted regarding premature incidence and mortality associated with stroke, and there is growing interest in altering risk factors and reversing this global epidemic. Among the known risk factors for stroke, dietary factors, especially dietary flavonoid intake, have aroused particular attention. Clinical studies have shown that flavonoid intake reduces cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.3–5 Additionally, experimental studies indicated that flavonoids have both antioxidant and antithrombotic properties.6 ,7

    Over the last two decades, many prospective studies have assessed the association between dietary flavonoid intake and risk of stroke.8–18 Although a recent meta-analysis that combined the results from eight cohort studies of flavonol intake and risk of stroke found a significant association of stroke of 0.86 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.99) for the highest versus lowest category of flavonol intake,19 the role of flavonoid intake in stroke prevention is still controversial. In addition, flavonoid intake differed substantially between studies, which makes it difficult to interpret the summary estimate based on results from study populations with different flavonoid intakes.20

    To fill these gaps, we conducted a dose-response meta-analysis of the current evidence for the association between flavonoid exposure, including cohort studies of dietary flavonoids, and risk of stroke.

    Methods

    Literature search

    The search strategy was conducted according to the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines.21 We performed a systematic search of PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library through February 2015. The following key words were used in our search strategies: ‘flavonoids’, ‘polyphenols’, ‘phenolics’, ‘flavonols’, ‘flavones’, ‘quercetin’, ‘kaempferol’, ‘myricetin’, ‘isorhamnetin’, ‘apigenin’, ‘luteolin’, ‘proanthocyanidins’, ‘anthocyanins’, ‘anthocyanidins’, ‘flavan-3-ols’, ‘isoflavones’, ‘flavanones’, ‘catechins’ and ‘stroke’, ‘cerebrovascular disease’, ‘cerebrovascular disorders’, ‘cerebral infarct’, ‘ischemic stroke’, ‘intracranial hemorrhage’, ‘intracranial artery disease’, ‘cardiovascular disease’, ‘myocardial ischemia’, ‘myocardial infarct’, ‘ischemic heart disease’, ‘coronary heart disease’, and ‘longitudinal studies’, ‘cohort studies’, ‘prospective studies’ and ‘follow-up studies’. We restricted the search to human studies. There were no language restrictions. In addition, we reviewed the reference lists of obtained articles and contacted authors to identify additional relevant studies and information. When the same or a similar patient cohort was included in several publications, only the most recent or complete report was selected for analysis. This search strategy was updated on 14 January 2016.

    Study selection

    Studies were selected for the meta-analysis if they fulfilled the following entry criteria: (1) the study had a community-based or population-based, prospective cohort design; (2) the exposure of interest was intake of dietary flavonoids (including flavonols, flavones, flavanones, flavan-3-ols, anthocyanidins, proanthocyanidins and isoflavones); (3) the outcome of interest was stroke, including all types of stroke (fatal, non-fatal, ischaemic and haemorrhagic); (4) reported quantitative estimates of the multivariate-adjusted relative risk (RR) and 95% CI for stroke incidence or mortality associated with flavonoid intake; and (5) more than 1 year of follow-up. Studies were excluded if: (1) the study had a cross-sectional or case-control design; (2) reported unadjusted or only age- or sex-adjusted RR; and (3) there was less than 1 year of follow-up.

    Data abstraction

    All data were independently abstracted in duplicate by two investigators (ML and XZ). Discrepancies were resolved by consensus. When necessary, the original authors were contacted for supplementary information. The following data were extracted from each study: the first author's last name, publication year, country where the study was performed, location, number of participants, participants' age, years of follow-up, assessment of dietary data and stroke, number of cases, adjusted covariates and study quality.

    Supplemental material

    Assessment of study quality

    The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of studies.22 The quality of cohort studies was evaluated as regards the following three major components: selection of the study group (0–4 stars), quality of the adjustment for confounding (0–2 stars) and assessment of outcome in the cohorts (0–3 stars). A higher score represents better methodological quality. The top score was nine stars. Studies were graded as high quality if they were awarded nine stars.

    Statistical analysis

    RRs were used as the common measure of association between flavonoid intake and stroke, and HRs were considered equivalent to RRs. Data analysis used multivariate-adjusted outcome data. We converted these values in every study by using their natural logarithms, and the SEs were calculated from these logarithmic numbers and their corresponding 95% CIs. When data on total stroke were not available, we used data from ischaemic stroke, non-fatal stroke or fatal stroke as an equivalent to total stroke.23 We combined these estimates using a random-effects model, which takes into account both within-study and between-study variabilities.24 In the dose-response analysis, the generalised least square for trend estimation method described by Greenland and Longnecker25 and Orsini et al26 was used to calculate study-specific slopes (linear trends) and 95% CIs. The method requires the distributions of cases and person-years for exposure categories, and the median/mean of flavonoid intake level for each comparison group. We assigned the midpoint of the upper and lower boundaries of each comparison group to determine mean flavonoid intake level if the median or mean intake was not provided. If the lower or upper boundary for the lowest and highest category, respectively, was not reported, we assumed that the boundary had the same amplitude as the closest category.20 Additionally, we first created restricted cubic splines with three knots at fixed percentiles (25%, 50%, and 75%) of the distribution.27 A p value for non-linearity was calculated by testing the null hypothesis that the coefficient of the fractional polynomials component is equal to zero. When data on total flavonoid intake included in this dose-response meta-analysis were not available, we used data from flavonols, flavones, flavanones, flavan-3-ols and isoflavones (in sequential order) as an equivalent to total flavonoid. Heterogeneity among studies was evaluated using the χ2 test based on Cochran's Q test and the I2 statistic at p<0.10 level of significance,24 which describes the percentage of variability in the effect estimates that is due to heterogeneity rather than chance.28 We regard I2<40% as ‘heterogeneity that might not be important’ and I2>75% as ‘considerable heterogeneity’ based on the suggestion of the Cochrane Handbook for Systemic Review of Interventions.29 All available data were utilised in the primary analysis. Subsequent subgroup analyses were conducted according to stroke outcomes (fatal/non-fatal vs ischaemic), follow-up duration (≤10 years vs >10 years), sex (male vs female vs combined), geographical area (USA vs Asia vs Europe), history of stroke (yes vs no) and study quality (high (score>8) vs low (score ≤8)). To explore possible explanations for heterogeneity and to test the robustness of the association, we conducted meta-regression, sensitivity analyses and the above-mentioned stratified analysis. The possibility of publication bias was evaluated using the Egger rank correlation test at p<0.10 level of significance and visual inspection of a funnel plot.30 ,31 In the case of publication bias, the ‘non-parametric trim-and-fill’ method was used to compute risk estimates corrected for this bias.32 All statistical analyses were performed in STATA V.12.0 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas, USA). p Values were two-sided and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

    Results

    Literature search

    Figure 1 shows the results of literature search and selection. We initially identified 236 citations. After exclusion of duplicate records and studies that did not fulfil our inclusion criteria, 28 studies remained. We evaluated the full texts of these 28 publications and excluded 17 studies for the following reasons: no stroke outcomes (n=8), duplicate reports (n=4) and reviews (n=5). Eleven studies finally met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis.8–18

    Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Literature search and study selection.

    Study characteristics

    The characteristics of the studies and of their participants are presented in table 1 and supplementary tables 1 and 2. Eleven studies involving 356 627 participants and more than 5154 stroke cases were included in the meta-analysis.8–18 Of these 11 studies, four conducted in the USA,11 ,14 ,16 ,17 one in an Asian country (Singapore)18 and six in European countries (Finland and the Netherlands).8–10 ,12 ,13 ,15 The number of participants ranged from 755 in the study by Marniemi et al12 to 98 469 in the study by McCullough et al.17 Four studies included both men and women,10 ,12 ,17 ,18 three studies included only men8 ,9 ,15 and four studies only women.11 ,13 ,14 ,16 The duration of follow-up ranged from 6.1 to 28 years,8 ,10 with a median of 14 years. The dietary assessment of flavonoid intake varied across studies: in most studies, intake of flavonoids was measured using food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) and dietary history interview. In most studies, stroke was assessed by medical records or death certificates based on ICD-8, ICD-9 or ICD-10.33–35 All studies provided adjusted risk estimates (eg, sex, body mass index, smoking, education), overall quality scores ranged from 7 to 9, and the median score was 8.

    View this table:
    Table 1

    Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis

    View this table:
    Table 2

    Stratified analyses of flavonoid intake and stroke risk

    Flavonoid intake and stroke risk

    The multivariable adjusted RRs of fatal or non-fatal stroke in relation to dietary flavonoid intake from individual studies and the combined RR are presented in figure 2. Only one of the 11 studies showed that flavonoid intake was significantly associated with decreased risk of stroke.10 Overall, participants with the highest dietary flavonoid intake experienced a significantly decreased risk for stroke compared with the lowest (combined RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.97; figure 2) after adjustment for other risk factors. We saw no heterogeneity among studies (p=0.774, I2=0%). Three of the 11 studies were eligible for the dose-response analysis of flavonoid intake and risk of stroke.9 ,14 ,16 Using a restricted cubic splines model, dose-response analysis found a statistically non-significant inverse association with risk of stroke per 100 mg/day increment in flavonoid intake (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.08; I2=0%, p=0.285; figures 3 and 4). No heterogeneity was observed (p=0.974).

    Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Random-effects analysis of fully adjusted studies for the highest versus lowest intake of flavonoids and risk of stroke.

    Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Dose-response relationship between dietary flavonoid intake and stroke risk. The solid line represents point estimates of the association between flavonoid intake and stroke risk, and the dotted lines are 95% CIs. The horizontal line is the reference line.

    Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Forest plot of flavonoid intake and risk of stroke. Three cohort studies were eligible for the dose-response analysis of flavonoid intake and risk of stroke. Relative risk <1.0 favours exposure to greater intake of flavonoid.

    Stratifying analysis

    In most subgroups, dietary flavonoid intake was not associated with stroke. Stratifying by sex, the associations between dietary flavonoid intake and risk of stroke were similar between males and females (table 2). The pooled RRs of stroke were 0.86 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.98) in studies conducted in the USA, 0.88 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.00) in studies conducted in Europe, and 0.97 (95% CI 0.81 to 1.16) in studies conducted in Asia (table 2). Stratifying by duration, we observed a protective effect of dietary flavonoid intake in studies with more than 10 years of follow-up. The associations were more evident in some strata of study characteristics (table 2).

    Sensitivity analysis and publication bias

    We tested the robustness of our results in sensitivity analysis, where a single study included in the meta-analysis was deleted at a time; the results of the meta-analysis remained largely unchanged, indicating that the results of the meta-analysis were stable (data not shown). Visual inspection of the funnel plot identified asymmetry (see online supplementary figure S1). The Egger test demonstrated no statistical evidence of publication bias among studies for stroke risk (p=0.238).

    Supplementary figure

    Egger funnel plot for detection of publication bias for stroke risk.

    Meta regression

    In this meta-analysis, although no heterogeneity was observed among individual studies, a multivariate regression was conducted to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity under stroke. The results of regression suggested that stroke outcomes, follow-up duration, sex, geographical area, history of stroke and study quality were not significant sources of heterogeneity.

    Discussion

    Our meta-analysis of 11 prospective studies indicates that dietary flavonoid intake may be inversely associated with risk of stroke. In addition, dose-response analysis indicated that a 100 mg/day increment in flavonoid intake was associated with a 9% lower risk of stroke (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.08). However, this association was not statistically significant.

    Potential benefits of flavonoids

    Flavonoids, a large class of polyphenols, are widely distributed in plants and are present in considerable amounts in fruits, vegetables, tea and red wine. These bioactive polyphenols are non-energy, non-nutrient secondary metabolites present in plants and cannot be synthesised by humans.36 In recent decades, overwhelming evidence has indicated that flavonoid intake is associated with well-known risk-factors for CVD. There is also some evidence that flavonoids may have a role in preventing the development of CVD (eg, coronary heart disease, stroke).37 ,38 In addition, although there are many putative biological mechanisms underlying a possible cardioprotective role for flavonoids,39 including anti-inflammatory40 and antioxidant effects,6 recovery of endothelial function by some compounds41 and reductions in platelet aggregation,42 and the effect of individual compounds or interactions between flavonoids is still largely unknown, flavonol and isoflavone intake may explain some of this beneficial effect.19 ,43

    Although the exact mechanism by which flavonoid intake may protect against the development of stroke is still ambiguous, a possible mechanism is the regulation of blood pressure, especially by anthocyanins, due to an increase in endothelial-derived nitric oxide (NO).44 Moreover, mainly attributed to antioxidant mechanisms, flavonoids reduced mitochondrial lipid peroxidation and loss of mitochondrial transmembrane electric potential caused by oxidative stress induced by ADP plus iron.45 A third mechanism is the protective action of flavonoids on the anti-inflammatory responses in the brain, which may be attributable to lipid raft disruption and antioxidant effects.46 Because the flavonoids are very diverse regarding their bioavailability and bioactivity, the rationale for assuming that intakes of all flavonoid classes might have effects on stroke needs more consideration.

    Results in relation to other studies

    Over the past decades, despite extensive studies that investigated the role of flavonoid intake on cardiovascular disease or cerebrovascular disease, it remains unclear whether the association between flavonoid intake and risk of stroke is causal. One study suggested that individuals with higher flavonoid intake had a lower risk of stroke,10 although others failed to find an association.8 ,9 More, importantly, the possibility of reverse causality should be addressed. A previous meta-analysis of flavonol intake and risk of stroke showed that flavonol intake was inversely associated with stroke incidence.38 That meta-analysis included six prospective cohort studies from three different countries: four of the studies were conducted in Europe (three in Finland and one in The Netherlands) and two in the USA. Inverse associations between flavonol intake and stroke were observed in two prospective cohort studies (the Zutphen Elderly Study and Kuopio Study) and significant inverse associations were found in the Finnish Mobile Clinic Study and Women's Health Study, which result was consistent with a detailed review by Wang et al.5 Conversely, no associations were noted in the Iowa Women's Health Study and the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study. The results for flavonols were consistent with our findings for flavonoids. However, the data from studies included in the previous meta-analysis were limited to articles published before August 2009.38 Since then, three new studies on the relationship between flavonoid intake and risk of stroke have been published.16–18 To obtain a more comprehensive estimate of the putative influence of flavonoids on stroke, we conducted a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. To our knowledge, this meta-analysis is the largest to reveal a potential relationship between dietary flavonoid intake and risk of stroke. However, most studies assess dietary flavonoid intake based on self-reported questionnaires using FFQs, and medical records were not always available for stroke classification. Consequently, misclassification of flavonoid intake or stroke was inevitable and may have biased true associations among individual studies.

    Strengths and limitations

    This study has several important strengths compared with previous meta-analyses.19 ,38 The present meta-analysis included twice as many participants and twice as many stroke cases. To our knowledge, this is the largest meta-analysis to date on flavonoid intake and risk of stroke. We also explored possible sources of heterogeneity using subgroup analyses and the meta-regression method, none of which were significant. Moreover, the presence of a dose-response relationship further strengthened the association of dietary flavonoid intake with risk of stroke. The results should be reliable.

    In interpreting the results, some limitations of this meta-analysis should be acknowledged. First, one limitation of any meta-analysis of observational studies is that residual confounding or confounding by unmeasured factors (such as intake of other nutrients) may have affected the strength of the association between flavonoid intake and stroke risk. Additionally, none of the studies used in this dose-response analysis included complete data on total flavonoid intake; the flavonoid intake may have been underestimated in the original studies. Thus, these findings should be treated with caution. Second, we cannot exclude the possibility of recall bias in dietary assessment based on the FFQs. However, the prospective study design and exclusion of participants with chronic diseases at baseline should minimise such bias. Third, a noticeable limitation of our study was the potential for bias due to inevitable measurement error and misclassification, especially for individuals with lower consumption levels. We attempted to reduce measurement error by adjusting for energy or fibre intake and using cumulatively averaged intake levels. Fourth, we tried to study the main sources of flavonoids but failed due to insufficient data. Different flavonoid subclasses were used in the primary studies included in this meta-analysis. Among the 11 studies, four included the same subclasses (including quercetin, kaempferol, myricetin, luteolin and apigenin),8 ,9 ,11 ,12 another five studies included similar subclasses (including flavonols, flavones, flavanones, flavan-3-ols, and so on),10 ,14–17 and three studies included isoflavones,13 ,17 ,18 as summarised in supplementary table 2. Among the 11 studies, only three were eligible for dose-response analysis. In addition, the flavonoid subclasses differed among the 11 studies: two studies included flavanones, three included flavones, three included flavonols, two included flavan-3-ols, and one included isoflavones. Due to the limited number of studies suitable for dose-response analyses and the insufficient statistical power, we did not conduct dose-response analysis separately on each class. Thus, we evaluated the effects of total flavonoid intake on stroke risk rather than the wide range of flavonoid subclasses. On the one hand, in order to balance the risk of a type I error (the true effect is zero but we reject the null) and a type II error (the true effect is not zero but we fail to reject the null), we combined these estimates using a random-effects model, which takes into account both within-study and between-study variabilities.24 Thus, these results should be treated with caution. Finally, a possible limitation is due to language bias. We attempted to minimise this bias by searching major electronic databases with no language restriction. However, articles in non-English publications or unpublished reports might not appear in international journal databases and may have been missed in our searches.47

    Conclusions

    In summary, results from this meta-analysis suggest that higher dietary flavonoid intake may moderately lower the risk of stroke after adjustment for established cardiovascular risk factors. Randomised controlled studies are needed to evaluate the effects of flavonoid intake on stroke risk.

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Feigin VL,
      2. Forouzanfar MH,
      3. Krishnamurthi R, et al
      . Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2014;383:245–54. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61953-4
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    2. ↵
      1. Mozaffarian D,
      2. Benjamin EJ,
      3. Go AS, et al
      . Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2016;133:e38–360. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000350
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    3. ↵
      1. Kar P,
      2. Laight D,
      3. Shaw KM, et al
      . Flavonoid-rich grapeseed extracts: a new approach in high cardiovascular risk patients? Int J Clin Pract 2006;60:1484–92. doi:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.01038.x
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    4. ↵
      1. Huntley AL
      . The health benefits of berry flavonoids for menopausal women: cardiovascular disease, cancer and cognition. Maturitas 2009;63:297–301. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.05.005
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    5. ↵
      1. Wang X,
      2. Ouyang YY,
      3. Liu J, et al
      . Flavonoid intake and risk of CVD: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Br J Nutr 2014;111:1–11. doi:10.1017/S000711451300278X
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    6. ↵
      1. Frei B,
      2. Higdon JV
      . Antioxidant activity of tea polyphenols in vivo: evidence from animal studies. J Nutr 2003;133:3275S–84S.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    7. ↵
      1. Sheng R,
      2. Gu ZL,
      3. Xie ML, et al
      . EGCG inhibits proliferation of cardiac fibroblasts in rats with cardiac hypertrophy. Planta Med 2009;75:113–20. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1088387
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    8. ↵
      1. Hirvonen T,
      2. Virtamo J,
      3. Korhonen P, et al
      . Intake of flavonoids, carotenoids, vitamins C and E, and risk of stroke in male smokers. Stroke 2000;31:2301–6. doi:10.1161/01.STR.31.10.2301
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    9. ↵
      1. Arts IC,
      2. Hollman PC,
      3. Feskens EJ, et al
      . Catechin intake might explain the inverse relation between tea consumption and ischemic heart disease: the Zutphen Elderly Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2001;74:227–32.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    10. ↵
      1. Knekt P,
      2. Kumpulainen J,
      3. Järvinen R, et al
      . Flavonoid intake and risk of chronic diseases. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;76:560–8.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    11. ↵
      1. Sesso HD,
      2. Gaziano JM,
      3. Liu S, et al
      . Flavonoid intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease in women. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;77:1400–8.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    12. ↵
      1. Marniemi J,
      2. Alanen E,
      3. Impivaara O, et al
      . Dietary and serum vitamins and minerals as predictors of myocardial infarction and stroke in elderly subjects. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2005;15:188–97. doi:10.1016/j.numecd.2005.01.001
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    13. ↵
      1. van der Schouw YT,
      2. Kreijkamp-Kaspers S,
      3. Peeters PH, et al
      . Prospective study on usual dietary phytoestrogen intake and cardiovascular disease risk in Western women. Circulation 2005;111:465–71. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000153814.87631.B0
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    14. ↵
      1. Mink PJ,
      2. Scrafford CG,
      3. Barraj LM, et al
      . Flavonoid intake and cardiovascular disease mortality: a prospective study in postmenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr 2007;85:895–909.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    15. ↵
      1. Mursu J,
      2. Voutilainen S,
      3. Nurmi T, et al
      . Flavonoid intake and the risk of ischaemic stroke and CVD mortality in middle-aged Finnish men: the Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study. Br J Nutr 2008;100:890–5. doi:10.1017/S0007114508945694
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    16. ↵
      1. Cassidy A,
      2. Rimm EB,
      3. O'Reilly EJ, et al
      . Dietary flavonoids and risk of stroke in women. Stroke 2012;43:946–51. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.637835
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    17. ↵
      1. McCullough ML,
      2. Peterson JJ,
      3. Patel R, et al
      . Flavonoid intake and cardiovascular disease mortality in a prospective cohort of US adults. Am J Clin Nutr 2012;95:454–64. doi:10.3945/ajcn.111.016634
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    18. ↵
      1. Talaei M,
      2. Koh WP,
      3. van Dam RM, et al
      . Dietary soy intake is not associated with risk of cardiovascular disease mortality in Singapore Chinese adults. J Nutr 2014;144:921–8. doi:10.3945/jn.114.190454
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    19. ↵
      1. Wang ZM,
      2. Zhao D,
      3. Nie ZL, et al
      . Flavonol intake and stroke risk: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Nutrition 2014;30:518–23. doi:10.1016/j.nut.2013.10.009
      OpenUrl
    20. ↵
      1. Peterson JJ,
      2. Dwyer JT,
      3. Jacques PF, et al
      . Associations between flavonoids and cardiovascular disease incidence or mortality in European and US populations. Nutr Rev 2012;70:491–508. doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.2012.00508.x
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    21. ↵
      1. Stroup DF,
      2. Berlin JA,
      3. Morton SC, et al
      . Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000;283:2008–12.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    22. ↵
      1. Stang A
      . Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 2010;25:603–5. doi:10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    23. ↵
      1. Pan A,
      2. Sun Q,
      3. Okereke OI, et al
      . Depression and risk of stroke morbidity and mortality: a meta-analysis and systematic review. JAMA 2011;306:1241–9. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.1282
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    24. ↵
      1. DerSimonian R,
      2. Laird N
      . Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177–88. doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    25. ↵
      1. Greenland S,
      2. Longnecker MP
      . Methods for trend estimation from summarized dose-response data, with applications to meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol 1992;135:1301–9.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    26. ↵
      1. Orsini N,
      2. Li R,
      3. Wolk A, et al
      . Meta-analysis for linear and nonlinear dose-response relations: examples, an evaluation of approximations, and software. Am J Epidemiol 2012;175:66–73. doi:10.1093/aje/kwr265
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    27. ↵
      1. Harrell FE Jr.,
      2. Lee KL,
      3. Pollock BG
      . Regression models in clinical studies: determining relationships between predictors and response. J Natl Cancer Inst 1988;80:1198–202. doi:10.1093/jnci/80.15.1198
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    28. ↵
      1. Higgins JP,
      2. Thompson SG,
      3. Deeks JJ, et al
      . Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557–60. doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    29. ↵
      1. Higgins JPT,
      2. Green S
      . Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Oxford, UK: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011:261–6.
    30. ↵
      1. Begg CB,
      2. Mazumdar M
      . Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994;50:1088–101. doi:10.2307/2533446
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    31. ↵
      1. Sterne JA,
      2. Egger M
      . Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. J Clin Epidemiol 2001;54:1046–55. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00377-8
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    32. ↵
      1. Duval S,
      2. Tweedie R
      . Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 2000;56:455–63. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    33. ↵
      1. Moriyama IM
      . The Eighth Revision of the International Classification of Diseases. Am J Public Health Nations Health 1966;56:1277–80. doi:10.2105/AJPH.56.8.1277
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    34. ↵
      1. Kupka K
      . International Classification of Diseases: Ninth Revision. WHO Chron 1978;32:219–25.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    35. ↵
      1. Bramer GR
      . International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. Tenth revision. World Health Stat Q 1988;41:32–6.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    36. ↵
      1. Goya L,
      2. Martin MÁ,
      3. Sarriá B, et al
      . Effect of cocoa and its flavonoids on biomarkers of inflammation: studies of cell culture, animals and humans. Nutrients 2016;8:pii: E212. doi:10.3390/nu8040212
      OpenUrl
    37. ↵
      1. Huxley RR,
      2. Neil HA
      . The relation between dietary flavonol intake and coronary heart disease mortality: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Eur J Clin Nutr 2003;57:904–8. doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601624
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    38. ↵
      1. Hollman PC,
      2. Geelen A,
      3. Kromhout D
      . Dietary flavonol intake may lower stroke risk in men and women. J Nutr 2010;140:600–4. doi:10.3945/jn.109.116632
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    39. ↵
      1. Geleijnse JM,
      2. Hollman PCh
      . Flavonoids and cardiovascular health: which compounds, what mechanisms. Am J Clin Nutr 2008;88:12–13.
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    40. ↵
      1. Landberg R,
      2. Sun Q,
      3. Rimm EB, et al
      . Selected dietary flavonoids are associated with markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in US women. J Nutr 2011;141:618–25. doi:10.3945/jn.110.133843
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    41. ↵
      1. Boesten DM,
      2. von Ungern-Sternberg SN,
      3. den Hartog GJ, et al
      . Protective pleiotropic effect of flavonoids on NAD+ levels in endothelial cells exposed to high glucose. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2015;2015:894597. doi:10.1155/2015/894597
      OpenUrl
    42. ↵
      1. Murphy KJ,
      2. Chronopoulos AK,
      3. Singh I, et al
      . Dietary flavanols and procyanidin oligomers from cocoa (Theobroma cacao) inhibit platelet function. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;77:1466–73.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    43. ↵
      1. Sagara M,
      2. Kanda T,
      3. NJelekera M, et al
      . Effects of dietary intake of soy protein and isoflavones on cardiovascular disease risk factors in high risk, middle-aged men in Scotland. J Am Coll Nutr 2004;23:85–91. doi:10.1080/07315724.2004.10719347
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    44. ↵
      1. Steffen Y,
      2. Gruber C,
      3. Schewe T, et al
      . Mono-O-methylated flavanols and other flavonoids as inhibitors of endothelial NADPH oxidase. Arch Biochem Biophys 2008;469:209–19. doi:10.1016/j.abb.2007.10.012
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    45. ↵
      1. Silva B,
      2. Oliveira PJ,
      3. Dias A, et al
      . Quercetin, kaempferol and biapigenin from Hypericum perforatum are neuroprotective against excitotoxic insults. Neurotox Res 2008;13:265–79. doi:10.1007/BF03033510
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    46. ↵
      1. Perez-Vizcaino F,
      2. Duarte J
      . Flavonols and cardiovascular disease. Mol Aspects Med 2010;31:478–94. doi:10.1016/j.mam.2010.09.002
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    47. ↵
      1. Li M,
      2. Hou W,
      3. Zhang X, et al
      . Hyperuricemia and risk of stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Atherosclerosis 2014;232:265–70. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.11.051
      OpenUrl

    Footnotes

    • ZT and ML contributed equally.

    • Contributors ML and ZT conceived and designed the study. ML and WH searched the databases and checked studies according to the eligibility and exclusion criteria. ZT helped develop search strategies. XZ and WH extracted quantitative data. XZ and WH analysed the data. ML wrote the draft of the paper. All authors contributed to writing, reviewing or revising the paper. ZT is the guarantor.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    • Data sharing statement No additional data are available.