Article Text

Does preoperative rehabilitation for patients planning to undergo joint replacement surgery improve outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
  1. Li Wang1,2,3,
  2. Myeongjong Lee4,
  3. Zhe Zhang5,
  4. Jessica Moodie1,
  5. Davy Cheng1,6,
  6. Janet Martin1,6,7
  1. 1Centre for Medical Evidence, Decision Integrity and Clinical Impact (MEDICI), University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
  2. 2Chinese Cochrane Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
  3. 3Michael G DeGroote Institute for Pain Research and Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  4. 4Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Chungju, South Korea
  5. 5Department of Anesthesiology, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
  6. 6Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
  7. 7Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Dr Janet Martin; jmarti83{at}uwo.ca

Abstract

Objectives The clinical impact of preoperative physiotherapy on recovery after joint replacement remains controversial. This systematic review aimed to assess the clinical impact of prehabilitation before joint replacement.

Design We searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL up to November 2015 for randomised controlled trials comparing prehabilitation versus no prehabilitation before joint replacement surgery. Postoperative pain and function scores were converted to Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and function subscales (0–100, high scores indicate worse outcome). Random effects meta-analysis was performed to calculate weighted mean differences (WMD, 95% CI), subgrouped by hip and knee surgery.

Primary and secondary outcomes Postoperative pain and function scores, time to resume activities of daily living, quality of life, length of hospital stay, total cost, patient satisfaction, postoperative complications, any adverse events and discontinuations.

Results Of 22 studies (1492 patients), 18 had high risk of bias. Prehabilitation slightly reduced pain scores within 4 weeks postoperatively (WMD −6.1 points, 95% CI −10.6 to −1.6 points, on a scale of 0–100), but differences did not remain beyond 4 weeks. Prehabilitation slightly improved WOMAC function score at 6–8 and 12 weeks (WMD −4.0, 95% CI −7.5 to −0.5), and time to climbing stairs (WMD −1.4 days, 95% CI −1.9 to −0.8 days), toilet use (−0.9 days, 95% CI −1.3 to −0.5 days) and chair use (WMD −1.2 days, 95% CI −1.7 to −0.8 days). Effects were similar for knee and hip surgery. Differences were not found for SF-36 scores, length of stay and total cost. Other outcomes of interest were inadequately reported.

Conclusions Existing evidence suggests that prehabilitation may slightly improve early postoperative pain and function among patients undergoing joint replacement; however, effects remain too small and short-term to be considered clinically-important, and did not affect key outcomes of interest (ie, length of stay, quality of life, costs).

  • REHABILITATION MEDICINE
  • ORTHOPAEDIC & TRAUMA SURGERY
  • PAIN MANAGEMENT
  • JOINT REPLACEMENT
  • META-ANALYSIS

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Supplementary materials