Article Text

Using probabilistic record linkage methods to identify Australian Indigenous women on the Queensland Pap Smear Register: the National Indigenous Cervical Screening Project
  1. Lisa J Whop1,
  2. Abbey Diaz1,
  3. Peter Baade2,
  4. Gail Garvey1,
  5. Joan Cunningham1,
  6. Julia M L Brotherton3,4,
  7. Karen Canfell5,6,
  8. Patricia C Valery1,7,
  9. Dianne L O'Connell5,
  10. Catherine Taylor8,
  11. Suzanne P Moore1,
  12. John R Condon1
  1. 1Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
  2. 2Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, Queensland, Australia
  3. 3Victorian Cytology Service, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  4. 4School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  5. 5Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  6. 6School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  7. 7QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  8. 8Queensland Record Linkage Group, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Lisa J Whop; lisa.whop{at}menzies.edu.au

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the feasibility and reliability of record linkage of existing population-based data sets to determine Indigenous status among women receiving Pap smears. This method may allow for the first ever population measure of Australian Indigenous women's cervical screening participation rates.

Setting/participants A linked data set of women aged 20–69 in the Queensland Pap Smear Register (PSR; 1999–2011) and Queensland Cancer Registry (QCR; 1997–2010) formed the Initial Study Cohort. Two extracts (1995–2011) were taken from Queensland public hospitals data (Queensland Hospital Admitted Patient Data Collection, QHAPDC) for women, aged 20–69, who had ever been identified as Indigenous (extract 1) and had a diagnosis or procedure code relating to cervical cancer (extract 2). The Initial Study Cohort was linked to extract 1, and women with cervical cancer in the initial cohort were linked to extract 2.

Outcome measures The proportion of women in the Initial Cohort who linked with the extracts (true -pairs) is reported, as well as the proportion of potential pairs that required clerical review. After assigning Indigenous status from QHAPDC to the PSR, the proportion of women identified as Indigenous was calculated using 4 algorithms, and compared.

Results There were 28 872 women (2.1%) from the Initial Study Cohort who matched to an ever Indigenous record in extract 1 (n=76 831). Women with cervical cancer in the Initial Study Cohort linked to 1385 (71%) records in extract 2. The proportion of Indigenous women ranged from 2.00% to 2.08% when using different algorithms to define Indigenous status. The Final Study Cohort included 1 372 823 women (PSR n=1 374 401; QCR n=1955), and 5 062 118 records.

Conclusions Indigenous status in Queensland cervical screening data was successfully ascertained through record linkage, allowing for the crucial assessment of the current cervical screening programme for Indigenous women. Our study highlights the need to include Indigenous status on Pap smear request and report forms in any renewed and redesigned cervical screening programme in Australia.

  • *Medical Record Linkage
  • Indigenous Status
  • Indigenous Algorithms
  • Neoplasms/*cervix
  • cervical screening

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.