Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Meaning of living with severe chronic obstructive lung disease: a qualitative study
  1. Gabriella Marx1,
  2. Maximilian Nasse1,
  3. Henrikje Stanze1,2,
  4. Sonja Owusu Boakye1,
  5. Friedemann Nauck1,
  6. Nils Schneider2
  1. 1Department of Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany
  2. 2Institute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Germany
  1. Correspondence to Dr Gabriella Marx; gabriella.marx{at}med.uni-goettingen.de

Abstract

Objectives To explore what it means for patients to live with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) as an incurable and constantly progressing disease.

Design Qualitative longitudinal study using narrative and semistructured interviews. This paper presents findings of the initial interviews. Analysis using grounded theory.

Setting Lung care clinics and community care in Lower Saxony, Germany.

Participants 17 patients with advanced-stage COPD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) III/IV).

Findings Analysis shows that these patients have difficulties accepting their life situation and feel at the mercy of the disease, which could be identified as a core-experienced phenomenon. Over a long period of time, patients have only a vague feeling of being ill, caused by uncertain knowledge, slow progress and doubtful attribution of clinical symptoms of the disease (causal conditions). As an action strategy, patients try to maintain daily routines for as long as possible after diagnosis. Both effective standard and rescue medication, which helps to reduce breathlessness and other symptoms, and the feeling of being faced with one's own responsibility (intervening conditions) support this strategy, whereby patients' own responsibility is too painful to acknowledge. As a consequence, patients try to deny the threat to life for a long period of time. Frequently, they need to experience facing their own limits, often in the form of an acute crisis, to realise their health situation. The experience of the illness is contextualised by a continuous increase in limited mobility and social isolation.

Conclusion In order to help patients to improve disease awareness, to accept their life situation and to improve their reduced quality of life, patients may benefit from the early integration of palliative care (PC), considering its multiprofessional patient-centred and team-centred approach. Psychological support and volunteer work, which are relevant aspects of PC, should be appropriate to address psychosocial needs. More research is needed to evaluate how patients could benefit from early PC.

  • QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
  • Patients' Perspectives
  • General Practice

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors NS (director of the department of general practice, Hannover Medical School) was principal investigator of the study and led the study design and supervised the research process. FN (director of the department of palliative medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen) was co-investigator of the study and co-designed the study. GM (PhD, research associate) and HS (Dip, research associate) prepared the interview guide, recruitment and data collection. GM and MN (doctoral candidate) interviewed the participants. GM, MN, HS and SOB (MA, research associate) conducted the analysis and repeatedly discussed the findings. GM wrote the first draft. All authors critically reviewed and approved the final version.

  • Funding This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Culture in Lower Saxony, Germany, grant number 74ZN1079.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethics approval The study received approval from the Ethics Committees of Hannover Medical School (registration number 5896) and University Medical Centre Göttingen (registration number 19/11/12).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement No additional data are available.