Article info

Download PDFPDF

Reporting quality of abstracts of trials published in top five pain journals: a protocol for a systematic survey

Authors

  • Kamath Sriganesh Department of Neuroanaesthesia, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India Department of Anaesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Suparna Bharadwaj Consultant Neuroanesthesiologist, Bangalore, Karnataka, India PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Mei Wang Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Luciana P F Abbade Department of Dermatology and Radiotherapy, Botucatu Medical School, Universidade Estadual Paulista, UNESP, São Paulo, Brazil PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Rachel Couban Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Pain Research and Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Lawrence Mbuagbaw Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Biostatistics Unit, Father Sean O'Sullivan Research Centre, St Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Lehana Thabane Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Biostatistics Unit, Father Sean O'Sullivan Research Centre, St Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Departments of Paediatrics and Anaesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Centre for Evaluation of Medicine, St Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  1. Correspondence to Dr Lehana Thabane; thabanl{at}mcmaster.ca
View Full Text

Citation

Sriganesh K, Bharadwaj S, Wang M, et al
Reporting quality of abstracts of trials published in top five pain journals: a protocol for a systematic survey

Publication history

  • Received April 18, 2016
  • Revised September 30, 2016
  • Accepted October 3, 2016
  • First published November 21, 2016.
Online issue publication 
November 21, 2016

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.