Article Text

Validating a decision tree for serious infection: diagnostic accuracy in acutely ill children in ambulatory care
  1. Jan Y Verbakel1,2,
  2. Marieke B Lemiengre3,
  3. Tine De Burghgraeve1,
  4. An De Sutter3,
  5. Bert Aertgeerts1,
  6. Dominique M A Bullens4,5,
  7. Bethany Shinkins2,
  8. Ann Van den Bruel2,
  9. Frank Buntinx1,6
  1. 1Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  2. 2Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  3. 3Department of Family Practice and Primary Health Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
  4. 4Clinical Department of Paediatrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  5. 5Paediatric Immunology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  6. 6Research Institute Caphri, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jan Y Verbakel; jan.verbakel{at}phc.ox.ac.uk

Abstract

Objective Acute infection is the most common presentation of children in primary care with only few having a serious infection (eg, sepsis, meningitis, pneumonia). To avoid complications or death, early recognition and adequate referral are essential. Clinical prediction rules have the potential to improve diagnostic decision-making for rare but serious conditions. In this study, we aimed to validate a recently developed decision tree in a new but similar population.

Design Diagnostic accuracy study validating a clinical prediction rule.

Setting and participants Acutely ill children presenting to ambulatory care in Flanders, Belgium, consisting of general practice and paediatric assessment in outpatient clinics or the emergency department.

Intervention Physicians were asked to score the decision tree in every child.

Primary outcome measures The outcome of interest was hospital admission for at least 24 h with a serious infection within 5 days after initial presentation. We report the diagnostic accuracy of the decision tree in sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and predictive values.

Results In total, 8962 acute illness episodes were included, of which 283 lead to admission to hospital with a serious infection. Sensitivity of the decision tree was 100% (95% CI 71.5% to 100%) at a specificity of 83.6% (95% CI 82.3% to 84.9%) in the general practitioner setting with 17% of children testing positive. In the paediatric outpatient and emergency department setting, sensitivities were below 92%, with specificities below 44.8%.

Conclusions In an independent validation cohort, this clinical prediction rule has shown to be extremely sensitive to identify children at risk of hospital admission for a serious infection in general practice, making it suitable for ruling out.

Trial registration number NCT02024282.

  • PRIMARY CARE
  • EPIDEMIOLOGY
  • ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINE

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.