Article Text

Hydrogen sulfide and traffic-related air pollutants in association with increased mortality: a case-crossover study in Reykjavik, Iceland
  1. Ragnhildur Gudrun Finnbjornsdottir1,
  2. Anna Oudin2,
  3. Bjarki Thor Elvarsson3,
  4. Thorarinn Gislason4,5,
  5. Vilhjalmur Rafnsson6
  1. 1Centre of Public Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
  2. 2Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
  3. 3Science Institute, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
  4. 4Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
  5. 5Department of Allergy and Respiratory Medicine and Sleep, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
  6. 6Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
  1. Correspondence to Dr Vilhjálmur Rafnsson; vilraf{at}


Objectives To study the association between daily mortality and short-term increases in air pollutants, both traffic-related and the geothermal source-specific hydrogen sulfide (H2S).

Design Population-based, time stratified case-crossover. A lag time to 4 days was considered. Seasonal, gender and age stratification were calculated. Also, the best-fit lag when introducing H2S >7 µg/m3 was selected by the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC).

Setting The population of the greater Reykjavik area (n=181 558) during 2003–2009.

Participants Cases were defined as individuals living in the Reykjavik capital area, 18 years or older (N=138 657), who died due to all natural causes (ICD-10 codes A00-R99) other than injury, poisoning and certain other consequences of external causes, or cardiovascular disease (ICD-10 codes I00-I99) during the study period.

Main outcome measure Percentage increases in risk of death (IR%) following an interquartile range increase in pollutants.

Results The total number of deaths due to all natural causes was 7679 and due to cardiovascular diseases was 3033. The interquartile range increased concentrations of H2S (2.6 µg/m3) were associated with daily all natural cause mortality in the Reykjavik capital area. The IR% was statistically significant during the summer season (lag 1: IR%=5.05, 95% CI 0.61 to 9.68; lag 2: IR%=5.09, 95% CI 0.44 to 9.97), among males (lag 0: IR%=2.26, 95% CI 0.23 to 4.44), and among the elderly (lag 0: IR%=1.94, 95% CI 0.12 to 1.04; lag 1: IR%=1.99, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.04), when adjusted for traffic-related pollutants and meteorological variables. The traffic-related pollutants were generally not associated with statistical significant IR%s.

Conclusions The results suggest that ambient H2S air pollution may increase mortality in Reykjavik, Iceland. To the best of our knowledge, ambient H2S exposure has not previously been associated with increased mortality in population-based studies and therefore the results should be interpreted with caution. Further studies are warranted to confirm or refute whether H2S exposure induces premature deaths.

  • Hydrogen Sulfide
  • Air pollution
  • Power Plants
  • Cross-over studies
  • Registries
  • Geothermal

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See:

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Strength and limitations of this study

  • The study is population-based and relies on comprehensive Icelandic population registries.

  • The death registration quality is high overall, with 100% completeness.

  • The methodology allows within-subject comparison while adjusting for various time trends such as seasonality and day of week.

  • Only one air quality measuring station used as a proxy for exposure of air pollutants for every individual of the whole capital area.

  • The Icelandic population is small and therefore, the total number of cases were few, which results in low statistical power.


A few studies have been conducted in Reykjavik, Iceland, on the possible health effects of air pollution.1–3 It is rumoured that the Reykjavik capital area is one of the cleanest cities in the world;1 however, daily levels of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and particle matter have been positively associated with the use of drugs for obstructive pulmonary disease.1 Later Reykjavik studies indicated an association between ozone (O3) and cardiopulmonary and stroke emergency hospital visits,3 and association of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and O3 with sales of glyceryl trinitrate for use against angina pectoris.2

The ambient air pollution in Reykjavik is not only due to traffic-related emissions from the high density of cars.4 In addition, two geothermal power plants, located approximately 26 and 33 km east of the city, are the main point sources of intermittent H2S concentrations in the city.5 ,6 The combined H2S emissions from the two geothermal power plants ranged from 7224 tons/year in 2003 to 20 756 tons/year in 2009.7 Health effects of H2S exposure from geothermal sources are to some extent known8 and long-term, low-level exposure to H2S adversely effects respiratory health, according to studies from different locations.9 ,10 However, a recent study in Rotorua, New Zealand, did not find an increased asthma risk associated with H2S exposure.11 Another study in Rotorua showed increased mortality due to respiratory diseases; however, those results were possibly confounded by ethnicity.12

The setting in the Reykjavik capital area with access to nation-wide death registry and continuous measurements of ambient air pollutants offers an opportunity to study the association of short-term increases in the traffic-related pollutants NO2, O3, PM10, SO2 and in particular, the geothermal source-specific H2S with mortality.

Materials and methods

Site description

The city of Reykjavik is the world’s northernmost capital of a sovereign state. Located in south-western Iceland, on the southern shore of the Faxafloi bay, the greater area of Reykjavik covers 247.5 km2 and is divided into seven smaller communities. The main sources of air pollution in the city are traffic-related pollutants and emission from two geothermal power plants located 26 and 33 km east of the city. The larger power plant Hellisheidarvirkjun (26 km from the city) started operating in September 2006; the Nesjavallavirkjun power plant had started operating in 1990.

Over the study period, 1 January 2003–31 December 2009, the annual mean population of the greater Reykjavik area was 181 558 individuals (49.7% males and 50.3% females).13 The study base consisted of inhabitants of the greater Reykjavik area living in one of the following communities (identified by postal codes): Alftanes, Gardabaer, Hafnarfjordur, Kopavogur, Mosfellsbaer, Reykjavik or Seltjarnarnes. The study included individuals who were 18 years and older (N=138 657).13

Case ascertainment

Statistics Iceland maintains the National Cause-of-Death Registry under the auspices of the Directorate of Health. The registry is nation-wide and includes causes of death according to death certificates classified by the International Classification of Diseases, Revision 10 (ICD-10).14 Data were obtained from the registry on cardiovascular mortality only (ICD-10 codes I00-I99) and all natural cause mortality (cardiovascular mortality included; ICD-10 codes A00-R99) other than injury, poisoning and certain other consequences of external causes. During the study period, the average number of deaths per year due to diseases of the respiratory system (ICD-10 codes J00-J99) was 161.6 and therefore, too few to make meaningful calculation due to lack of power. The data also contained information on encrypted personal identification number, day of death, age at time of death, postal codes and gender of the deceased.

Finally, two preconditions were needed to be defined as a case: (1) the individual was living in the Reykjavik capital area on the day of death in one of the aforementioned communities, and (2) the individual was 18 years or older.

Exposure and covariate assessment

Exposure data were obtained from the Environment Agency of Iceland (EAI). The agency operates an air pollution measurement station located at one of Reykjavik's main road intersections (Grensasvegur-Miklabraut), where around 60 000 cars on average cross the intersection each day.15 Hourly concentrations were obtained for NO2, O3, PM10, SO2 and H2S measured as µg/m3. Data on meteorological variables (temperature (°C), relative humidity (RH)) were derived from the same measurement station. Monthly numbers of influenza cases were obtained from the Directorate of Health. The influenza season was defined as 300 cases/month and introduced as a dichotomous variable.

NO2 and O3 were measured with a Horiba (models APNA 360E and APSA 360ACE) device, PM10 with an Andersen EMS IR Thermo (model FH62 I-R), and SO2 and H2S were measured with the same device, Horiba (model APOA 360E). The devices are calibrated every 6–12 months. Some gaps in the data were evident, which is attributed to inactive measurement devices for various unknown reasons.

The data set pertained to 7 years or 2557 days. The 24 h average parameter was calculated for each pollutant using the hourly concentrations from midnight to midnight the following day, where at least 75% of the 1 h data existed. Missing 24 h values for NO2, O3 and PM10 were 183 days (7%), 230 days (9%) and 65 days (3%), respectively. SO2 measurements started on 3 January 2004 and H2S on 22 February 2006; so the exposure information for these pollutants was available for a shorter time span than the others, contributing to 2190 and 1408 days in the data set, respectively. The missing data for these pollutants over the study period were 145 days (7%) for SO2 and 156 days (11%) for H2S. Temperature and RH measurement started on 1 January 2004, thus contributing to 2192 days in the data set. The missing data were 42 days (2%) for the two factors. Most unavailable values were in 2003, but otherwise the missing values were random and not associated with any specific day of the week. Gaps in the data due to missing values were filled by linear interpolation of adjacent values.

Descriptive statistics were calculated for the 24 h average concentrations of environmental data. To evaluate the intercorrelation between exposure variables and meteorological covariates, Spearman's correlation test was used.

Design and data analysis

A case-crossover design was used to estimate the association of short-term daily exposure of air pollution with all natural cause and cardiovascular mortality by applying a time-stratified referent selection approach. We divided the study period into monthly strata and the exposure of the case day (index day) was compared with the exposure of the control days, which were matched on the same day of the week within the same stratum. This would give a maximum of four control days per case.16 ,17 Both single pollutant models and multivariate models (containing all pollutants and meteorological factors) were calculated; separate models were used for all natural cause, and cardiovascular mortality. There was a seasonal difference in the concentrations of the pollutants and 80 years of age is a proxy for the mean age at death. Separate analyses were performed by stratifying on season (winter: 1 November–30 April, summer: 1 May–31 October), gender, age (≥80 and <80 years). We used conditional logistic regression giving adjusted ORs and 95% CIs scaled to the IQR increase of the 24 h concentration level of each pollutant. All multivariate models were adjusted for temperature and RH. Results will be shown as percentage increases in risk of death (IR%).

A lag time of up to 4 days (five lags: 0–4) was introduced separately to the analyses. Lag definitions are as follows: lag 0: air pollution exposure on the same day as death occurred, lag 1–4: air pollution exposure 1 day before (lag 1) and up to 4 days before (lag 4) the death occurred.

A number of supplementary analyses were conducted. First, the time-stratified approach was applied by dividing the study period into 2-month strata using a referent selection matched on the same day of the week with 14-day intervals within the same stratum as the case day. Second, models using 1 and 2 months strata were also run by introducing the 3-day running averages of each environmental factor, separately. All analyses were adjusted for influenza season; however, this was omitted from the single and multivariate analyses as introducing these did not change the risk. The results for these analyses will not be presented here as they were practically identical to the presented results and are available on request.

A principal component analysis was conducted on the pollutant data set after 6 January 2003 to the end of the study period,18 prior to the selection of the best model. The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC)19 was used to select the lag model with the lowest AIC from the series of lags 0–4, when components 1–8, season, influenza and H2S above 7 µg/m3 were entered into the model. The H2S above 7 µg/m3 was chosen because of the right skewed distribution of the H2S concentration and this limit is considered as the odour limit for H2S.20

R V.3.0.3 was used for all statistical analyses.21 Within R, the ‘season’ package22 was used to perform the time-stratified case-crossover analysis. All statistical tests applied in the study were two-tailed and we considered statistically significant all results with p<0.05.

The study protocol was approved by the National Bioethics Committee (ref. no. VSNb2010030008/03.7) and the Data Protection Authority (ref. no. 2010030263 ÞS/-).


Description of the mortality and the environmental data

The total numbers of deaths due to all natural cause death and from cardiovascular diseases in the greater Reykjavik area during the study period were 7679 and 3033 cases, respectively, where the gender rate was just about equal in both cases. On average, there were 3.2 and 1.7 deaths due to all natural causes and cardiovascular diseases, respectively, each day. The average age at death of individuals who died of all natural causes was 78 years (males: 76 years; females: 80 years). For individuals who died due to a cardiovascular event, the average age at death was 81 years (males: 78 years; females: 84 years; table 1).

Table 1

Number of participants who died in the Reykjavik area during the study period 2003–2009, by causes of death and gender

The distributions of the environmental variables are presented in table 2. Pollution data completeness varied from 48.9% (H2S) to 97.5% (PM10; table 2). There was a seasonal pattern among each pollutant and meteorological variable. The mean for each pollutant was higher during the winter months of November–April than during the summer months May–October. The concentration range for PM10 was the largest, followed by NO2. Daily SO2 24 h average concentration was often low with a small range up to 11.0 µm/m3; only 5% of the 24 h values were above 5.3 µg/m3. The highest value of the IQR was for O3 and lowest for SO2. For H2S, the IQR was quite low (2.60 µg/m3) although the maximum value was around 92 µg/m3 (figure 1).

Table 2

Characteristics and 24 h concentrations levels (µg/m3) of pollutants and meteorological data during the study period 2003–2009 in the Reykjavik area

Figure 1

Distribution of 24 h average concentrations of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) in μg/m3 in Reykjavik, Iceland, over the study period of 1 January 2003–31 December 2009. H2S measurements started in February 2006. Gaps in figure are due to missing data.

The pairwise correlation coefficients for 24 h mean pollutants and meteorological variables are shown in table 2. The strongest positive correlation was between NO2 and SO2 (0.53). The strongest negative association was between NO2 and O3. The weakest correlation was between PM10 and other pollutant factors. H2S was correlated with NO2, SO2 and O3. Temperature was inversely correlated with all pollutants. RH was weakly correlated with most pollutants; however, the strongest correlation was −0.35 with PM10 (table 2).

All natural cause death

Table 3 shows the percentage increases in risk of all natural cause death (ICD-10 codes A00-R99), other than injury, poisoning and certain other consequences of external causes, associated with IQR increases of the 24 h mean concentrations of each pollutant in multivariate analyses.

Table 3

Percentage increases in risk (IR%) and 95% CIs associated with IQR increase in 24 h mean concentrations of NO2, O3, PM10, H2S, and SO2 by all natural cause death (ICD-10 codes A-R) from unique multivariate analyses separately for each lag in the Reykjavik area, adjusted for each pollutant, temperature, and relative humidity

The results are shown in models that were unstratified and stratified on season, gender and age. The analyses of H2S showed a certain pattern which is not observed for the other pollutants. In the unstratified model, there was an increased risk at lag 0 and 1 which was not statistically significant; however, and at lag 3 there was a statistically significant decrease. During the summer months there was increased risk at lag 0 and statistically significant increased risk at lag 1 and 2. During the winter months, there was a statistically significant decreased risk at lag 3, corresponding to the increase during the summer months. For males, there was an increased risk at lag 0. For individuals, who were 80 years of age and older, there was a statistically significant increased risk at lag 0 and lag 1, and among individuals younger than 80 years of age there was a statistically significant decrease at lag 2. For O3 there was a statistically significant decreased risk at lag 3 in the unstratified and summer models. For SO2 there was a statistically significant increased risk at lag 4 in the winter models. For NO2 there was a statistically significant decreased risk at lag 1 and lag 4 for males and females, respectively. For PM10 there was statistically significant increased risk at lag 0 for individuals younger than 80 years of age.

The single pollutant models for all natural cause death gave a similar pattern for H2S; however, in many statistically significant lags in the multivariate models, the CIs were wider and included unity in the single pollutant models (see online supplementary table S1).

Cardiovascular death

Online supplementary tables S2 and S3 show the percentage increases in risk in cardiovascular diseases (ICD-10 codes I00-I99) associated with IQR increases of the 24 h mean concentrations of each pollutant in single pollutant and multivariate models that were unstratified and stratified on season, gender and age.

In the multivariate models (see online supplementary table S2) there was a significant increased risk at lag 0 for PM10 and SO2 for those younger than 80 years of age as well as at lag 1 for SO2. For individuals 80 years and older there was a statistically significant decrease at lag 1 for the same pollutants corresponding to the increase among individuals younger than 80 years of age. Additionally, the analysis of SO2 showed a significant increased risk among females at lag 4 and during winter months at lag 1 for PM10 (see online supplementary table S2).

In the single pollutant models (see online supplementary table S3) for cardiovascular diseases, the CIs were wide and all included unity except for PM10 and SO2 for individuals younger than 80 years of age at lag 0.

Model selection

The factor loadings of the principal components for pollutants are shown in table 4. The first component is mainly humidity, the second is a combination of NO2 and PM10, and the third appears to capture the inverse correlation between NO2 and O3 observed in table 2. Other components are a combination of a larger number of pollutants, where the fourth component is mainly the combination of O3 and NO2, the fifth component is mainly effects of H2S and the eighth component appears to follow SO2 linearly.

Table 4

Principal components analysis for pollutants and meteorological variables for the years 2003–2009, the significant factor loadings and the components according to the amount of variance explained

Among all lags, the best models are at lag 3 (3 parameters, AIC value 42 158.86) and at lag 2 (2 parameters, AIC value 42 160.84) with delta AIC=1.98. The percentage increases in risk of all natural cause death is shown in table 5 for these two lags. At lag 3, the IR% associated with component 4 appeared with decreased risk, which is not statistically significant. However, H2S above 7 µg/m3 was with decreased risk, p value of 0.022. Interaction between season (summer) and component 4 (NO2: 0.648; O3: 0.691; PM10: −0.159; temperature: −0.268) was decreased, and interaction between season (summer) and H2S above 7 µg/m3 was increased and these were significant with p values of 0.042 and 0.015, respectively. According to the OR for all natural cause death associated with H2S in the model at lag 3, the increased risk is 16.54 when H2S exceeded 7 µg/m3 3 days before. At lag 2, the IR% associated with H2S above 7 µg/m3 was with decreased risk, p value of 0.004. Interaction between season (summer) and H2S above 7 µg/m3 was increased and was significant with p values of 0.006. According to the OR for all natural cause death associated with H2S in the model, at lag 2 the increased risk is 16.59 when H2S exceeded 7 µg/m3 2 days before.

Table 5

Percentage increases in risk (IR%), 95% CIs, and p values by all natural cause death during 2003–2009 in the Reykjavik area, at lag 2 and 3, the best models according to the Akaike Information Criterion

The results for all lags are shown in online supplementary table S4.


We found associations between increased concentration of H2S and daily all natural cause death in the Reykjavik area. These associations were strong and statistically significant during summer months (lag 1 and lag 2), among males (lag 0), and among the elderly (lag 0 and lag 1) when adjusted for traffic-related pollutants and meteorological variables. The pattern seen of percentage increases in risk of death associated with increased concentration of H2S is compatible with harvesting effect, that is, increased risk at lower lags (0–2), and decreased risk at higher lag (3) through the unstratified and stratified analyses. The results from the model selection support these findings as they show an interaction between H2S exposure, season (summer), and some traffic-related pollutants at lag 3 and lag 2. The results from the principle components analysis were used in the model selection. Death due to diseases of the circulatory system showed a similar pattern, but the associations were weaker. The H2S pollution in the Reykjavik area originates from two geothermal power plants located 26–33 km east of the city. In the present study, we did not find the well-known association between traffic-related pollutants and mortality, and it should be noted that the concentrations are low and the population is small.

Bates et al12 found increased respiratory disease mortality among Maori females in the geothermal area of Rotorua compared to mortality in New Zealand. The authors mention the possibility of uncontrolled confounding by ethnicity in their study12 and there was a known difference in smoking habits by ethnicity. Later studies of Rotorua population showed an increase in circulatory diseases and chronic health effects related to H2S exposure.23 ,24 A still later ecological study from Rotorua, using a hospital discharge registry, found increased association between H2S, and respiratory diseases and symptoms.9

Inhabitants of volcanic areas have been found to have a high incidence of chronic bronchitis compared with those not exposed to volcanic environments and these findings may be attributed to exposure to H2S or SO2.25 As previously mentioned, H2S has been described in volcanic environments8 and is primarily considered an upper respiratory irritant. Neurological effects and fatal intoxication have also been related to high H2S exposures8 ,25 and among the deadly intoxications, a fatal case was reported in a geothermal power plant.26

For exposure to H2S in settings other than volcanic environment, the potential health effects among sewer, oil and gas workers, general population located near a pulp mill, industrial wastewater plants, geothermal energy production and industrial swine operations27–29 have been studied. These studies have reported on respiratory symptoms, decreased performance on pulmonary functions tests and increased respiratory diseases. More recent studies on populations near industrial swine operations, slaughter and tanning facilities and wastewater treatment complexes exposed to low-level H2S report odour nuisance and an increase in hospital visits due to respiratory diseases.30 ,31 Finally, a study on workers exposed to low-level H2S from various industries found this study group to have impaired neurobehavioral functions,32 a finding that was considered to match reports on neurological squeal among survivors of serious H2S intoxications. On the contrary, chronic H2S exposure was not associated with impaired cognitive function in a study of the population in Rotorua.33

In a recent Icelandic long-term follow-up study among residents of geothermal areas who had been using the hot geothermal water for space heating, washing and bathing (not as drinking water), increased mortality was found for several cancer types, including non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, breast, prostate and kidney cancers, as well as influenza and suicide.34 This study had a different approach, as compared to the present one, as it mainly aimed to confirm previously found increased cancer incidence;35 ,36 however, the population was evidently exposed to low level H2S.

In summary, ambient H2S in unpolluted areas are 0.03 to 0.4 µg/m3. Reports on adverse health effects of H2S on humans come from acute incidents and occupational studies as population-based studies are few. The odour threshold varies and is often estimated at 7 µg/m3; olfactory paralysis occurs at concentrations higher than 140 mg/m3, while exposure at 700 mg/m3 for a short period of time (few breaths) can be fatal. Short-term exposure to high concentration causes effects in different systems, the most important being the respiratory, neurological and ocular effects. Increased mortality has not previously been associated with low levels (100 µg/m3).25

The main strength of this study is that it is population-based and relies on the comprehensive population registries, the National Registry, for the information on the postal codes of the inhabitants of the Reykjavik area and the nation-wide Cause-of-Death Registry for the mortality data. The use of the personal identification numbers of every Icelandic individual in the registries precluded double counting of individuals and events.

In Iceland, death certificates are issued by a physician. According to a study at a global level on the quality of the death registration, the data from Iceland was categorised as of high quality overall and classified with data from 23 developed countries, including US and UK.37

Another strength of the present study is the methodology, the time-stratified case-crossover approach, which allows within-subject comparison while adjusting for various time trends such as seasonality and day of week.

The pollution from the volcanic eruption of the Eyjafjallajökull in 2010 is not confounding the results of the present study as that event occurred after the study period.38 ,39

A few limitations to this study should be mentioned. One is that the pollution data is derived from only one measurement station in Reykjavik rather than containing data on individual exposure. This station was, thus, used as a proxy for exposure of air pollutants for the death of individuals in the whole capital area although meteorological factors, such as wind speed and direction, cloud cover, precipitation and geographical distribution, are known to affect air pollution concentrations. This is especially true for H2S, where concentrations of H2S depend on various meteorological factors.5 ,40 Many calculations performed in the present study may give rise to concern due to multiple comparisons; however, it has been argued that no adjustments are needed for these.41 The increased risk seemed to be restricted to the oldest in the population and the data consisted of those 18 years of age and older, limiting the generalisability of the results with regard to age. Another limitation is the small number of cases, especially with regard to cardiovascular mortality, which are statistically underpowered. This can lead to wide CIs and uncertain conclusions. This is an inherent weakness for small populations such as Iceland. Also, cause of death in this study was only based on the primary cause mentioned in the death registries. Secondary causes, from the death certificates, were not available. In this study, the main focus has been on all natural cause mortality, which is a wide and heterogeneous category and it would be desirable to study this association according to cause-specific mortality in a larger data. Furthermore, there may be possible misclassification concerning cause of death; however, this is perhaps unlikely when the whole category of all natural cause deaths is the issue. Finally, the exact hour of death was not included in the mortality data and therefore, the possibility that the time of death may have preceded the exposure increase at lag 0 could not be ruled out.


The results from this study indicate an increase in mortality following an increase in H2S concentrations (2.6 µg/m3), especially if the 24 h concentrations exceed 7 µg/m3 during summer months. Ambient H2S exposure has been associated with increased cardiovascular and respiratory morbidity; however, to the best of our knowledge, increased mortality associated with H2S exposure among the general population has not been previously reported. Therefore, the results have to be interpreted with caution. Further studies and improved methodology are warranted to confirm or refute whether H2S exposure induces premature deaths.


The authors thank Thorsteinn Johannsson for his assistance in handling the pollution data, the Environment Agency of Iceland, and Statistics Iceland for allowing us access to their data for the study.


Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    Files in this Data Supplement:


  • Twitter Follow Ragnhildur Finnbjornsdottir at @ragnhildurf

  • Contributors RGF, AO, BTE, TG and VR substantially contributed to the conception and design, obtained the data or analysed and interpreted the data; drafting of the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and approved the final version of the submitted manuscript.

  • Funding This study was supported by The Doctoral Grants of The University of Iceland Research Fund, grant number HI201090.

  • Competing interests The authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure and the authors have no competing interests.

  • Ethics approval Permissions related to the data: National Bioethics Committee (ref. no. VSNb2010030008/03.7) and the Data Protection Authority (ref. no. 2010030263ÞS/-).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement No additional data are available.