Responses

UK research spend in 2008 and 2012: comparing stroke, cancer, coronary heart disease and dementia
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Government cancer research spend recorded in the NCRI Cancer Research Database
    • Dominic Dwyer, Research Analyst
    • Other Contributors:
      • Karen Kennedy, Director NCRI

    We read with interest this article by Luengo Fernandez et al. and commend the team on exploring a number of important areas in health research funding, especially given that the collection of data across a number of years in a bespoke manner such as this is very challenging.

    While the article highlights some very interesting trends, one trend that has not been observed in the National Cancer Research Institute...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.