Article Text

Adherence-adjusted estimates of benefits and harms from treatment with amoxicillin for LRTI: secondary analysis of a 12-country randomised placebo-controlled trial using randomisation-based efficacy estimators
  1. David Gillespie1,
  2. Kerenza Hood1,
  3. Daniel Farewell2,
  4. Christopher C Butler2,3,
  5. Theo Verheij4,
  6. Herman Goossens5,
  7. Beth Stuart6,
  8. Mark Mullee6,
  9. Paul Little7,
  10. On behalf of the GRACE consortium
  1. 1South East Wales Trials Unit (SEWTU), Institute of Primary Care & Public Health, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
  2. 2Institute of Primary Care & Public Health, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
  3. 3Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
  4. 4University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Center for Health, Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  5. 5Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
  6. 6Primary Care and Population Sciences Division, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
  7. 7Department of Primary Medical Care, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK
  1. Correspondence to David Gillespie; gillespied1{at}cardiff.ac.uk

Abstract

Objectives Estimate the efficacy of amoxicillin for acute uncomplicated lower-respiratory-tract infection (LRTI) in primary care and demonstrate the use of randomisation-based efficacy estimators.

Design Secondary analysis of a two-arm individually-randomised placebo-controlled trial.

Setting Primary care practices in 12 European countries.

Participants Patients aged 18 or older consulting with an acute LRTI in whom pneumonia was not suspected by the clinician.

Interventions Amoxicillin (two 500 mg tablets three times a day for 7 days) or matched placebo.

Main outcome measures Clinician-rated symptom severity between days 2–4; new/worsening symptoms and presence of side effects at 4-weeks. Adherence was captured using self-report and tablet counts.

Results 2061 participants were randomised to the amoxicillin or placebo group. On average, 88% of the prescribed amoxicillin was taken. The original analysis demonstrated small increases in both benefits and harms from amoxicillin. Minor improvements in the benefits of amoxicillin were observed when an adjustments for adherence were made (mean difference in symptom severity −0.08, 95% CI −0.17 to 0.01, OR for new/worsening symptoms 0.81, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.98) as well as minor increases in harms (OR for side effects 1.32, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.57).

Conclusions Adherence to amoxicillin was high, and the findings from the original analysis were robust to non-adherence. Participants consulting to primary care with an acute uncomplicated LRTI can on average expect minor improvements in outcome from taking amoxicillin. However, they are also at an increased risk of experiencing side effects.

Trial registration numbers Eudract-CT 2007-001586-15 and ISRCTN52261229.

The trial was registered at EudraCT in 2007 due to an administrative misunderstanding that EudraCT was a suitable registry—which it was not in 2007, but has become since. On discovery of this error, the trial was also registered at ISRCTN (January 2009). Trial procedures did not change between the two registrations.

  • PRIMARY CARE
  • RESPIRATORY MEDICINE (see Thoracic Medicine)
  • STATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    Files in this Data Supplement: