Systems science and systems thinking for public health: a systematic review of the field
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

  • Published on:
    Systems science in Public Health: building capacity, navigating language... with MeSH?
    • Laura Sheble, Postdoctoral Associate
    • Other Contributors:
      • Kristen Hassmiller Lich, Leah Frerichs, Gaurav Dave, Giselle Corbie-Smith: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA

    We agree with Carey et al.(1) that systems science methods are an important addition to the methodological and conceptual toolbox used to approach complex public health problems and risk factors.(2) In order to realize the full potential of these methods, it is necessary to review and critique the state of the science regarding systems science applications in the public health research context, both calling out successes...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.