Article Text

Download PDFPDF

A qualitative evidence synthesis on the management of male obesity
  1. Daryll Archibald1,
  2. Flora Douglas2,
  3. Pat Hoddinott3,
  4. Edwin van Teijlingen4,
  5. Fiona Stewart5,
  6. Clare Robertson6,
  7. Dwayne Boyers7,
  8. Alison Avenell6
  1. 1Scottish Collaboration for Public Health Research & Policy (SCPHRP), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Lothian, UK
  2. 2Rowett Institute of Health and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Medical School, Aberdeen, UK
  3. 3NMAHP Research Unit, Unit 13 Scion House, University of Stirling, Stirling University Innovation Park, Stirling, UK
  4. 4Maternal & Perinatal Health Faculty of Health & Social Sciences, Centre for Midwifery, Christchurch Road Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK
  5. 5Cochrane Incontinence Review Group, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
  6. 6Health Services Research Unit (HSRU), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
  7. 7Health Economics Research Unit (HERU) and Health Services Research Unit (HSRU), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Daryll Archibald; Daryll.Archibald{at}ed.ac.uk

Abstract

Objectives To investigate what weight management interventions work for men, with which men, and under what circumstances.

Design Realist synthesis of qualitative studies.

Data sources Sensitive searches of 11 electronic databases from 1990 to 2012 supplemented by grey literature searches.

Study selection Studies published between 1990 and 2012 reporting qualitative research with obese men, or obese men in contrast to obese women and lifestyle or drug weight management were included. The studies included men aged 16 years or over, with no upper age limit, with a mean or median body mass index of 30 kg/m2 in all settings.

Results 22 studies were identified, including 5 qualitative studies linked to randomised controlled trials of weight maintenance interventions and 8 qualitative studies linked to non-randomised intervention studies, and 9 relevant UK-based qualitative studies not linked to any intervention. Health concerns and the perception that certain programmes had ‘worked’ for other men were the key factors that motivated men to engage with weight management programmes. Barriers to engagement and adherence with programmes included: men not problematising their weight until labelled ‘obese’; a lack of support for new food choices by friends and family, and reluctance to undertake extreme dieting. Retaining some autonomy over what is eaten; flexibility about treats and alcohol, and a focus on physical activity were attractive features of programmes. Group interventions, humour and social support facilitated attendance and adherence. Men were motivated to attend programmes in settings that were convenient, non-threatening and congruent with their masculine identities, but men were seldom involved in programme design.

Conclusions Men's perspectives and preferences within the wider context of family, work and pleasure should be sought when designing weight management services. Qualitative research is needed with men to inform all aspects of intervention design, including the setting, optimal recruitment processes and strategies to minimise attrition.

  • Men
  • Weight management
  • Systematic Reviews
  • Behavioural Change

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.