You are here

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

XML
Immunology (including allergy)
Research
Prevalence and risk factors for allergic rhinitis in bakers in Douala, Cameroon
  1. Bertrand Hugo Mbatchou Ngahane1,2,3,
  2. Emmanuel Afane Ze4,
  3. Francis Nde5,
  4. Eliane Ngomo6,
  5. Yacouba Mapoure Njankouo1,2,
  6. Louis Richard Njock4,7
  1. 1Department of Internal Medicine, Douala General Hospital, Douala, Littoral, Cameroon
  2. 2Faculty of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon
  3. 3Douala Research Network, Douala, Cameroon
  4. 4Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaounde 1, Yaounde, Cameroon
  5. 5Ecole de Santé Publique, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
  6. 6Université des Montagnes, Bangangte, Cameroon
  7. 7ENT Department, Douala General Hospital, Douala, Cameroon
  1. Correspondence to Dr Mbatchou Ngahane Bertrand Hugo; mbatchou.ngahane{at}yahoo.com

Abstract

Objective To determine the prevalence and risk factors of allergic rhinitis among bakers in Douala.

Design A cross-sectional study; the logistic regression model was use to find the risk factors of allergic rhinitis.

Setting The study was conducted in 42 bakeries randomly selected among a total of 151 bakeries in the city of Douala.

Participants All bakers who consented to participate in the study between 1 May and 31 July 2013.

Outcome measures Allergic rhinitis was the outcome of interest. It was defined as the presence of the following symptoms: itchy nose, rhinorrhea, nasal obstruction and sneezing.

Results During the study period, a total of 273 bakers were invited and 229 finally agreed to participate in this study. Males were the most represented gender with 222 (96.9%) participants. The mean age of the participants was 36.29±8.9 years. Smoking was found in 55 participants (24.5%). The symptoms of allergic rhinitis were observed in 24.5% of participants. Work related nasal symptoms were present in 15% of participants. Sensitisation to wheat flour and α-amylase was found in 16.6% and 8.3% of participants, respectively. The Prick test was positive for mites in 12.2% of participants. After multivariate analysis, sensitisation to flour (OR 3.95, 95% CI 1.85 to 8.47) and storage mites (OR 3.44, 95% CI 1.45 to 8.18) were the factors independently associated with symptoms of allergic rhinitis.

Conclusions Allergic rhinitis is frequent among bakers in Cameroon. Implementation of preventive measures against inhalation of airborne allergens in bakeries and clinical monitoring of bakers sensitised to wheat flour and mites could help to reduce the prevalence of allergic rhinitis among bakers.

  • wheat flour
  • bakeries
  • Africa

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005329

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Strengths and limitations of this study

    • This study is among the first carried out in sub-Saharan Africa that have sought an association between workplace aeroallergens in bakers and the symptoms of allergic rhinitis.

    • The logistic regression, which is a pretty solid statistical method for the detection of associations between variables, was used in this study.

    • The measurement of the exposure to dust in bakeries was not made.

    • The specific serum IgE antibodies measurements, a method with better specificity and sensitivity than that of skin tests, for the diagnosis of allergen sensitisation were not performed.

    Introduction

    Allergic rhinitis is a common condition in current medical practice. Allergic rhinitis, besides asthma, is a principal manifestation of respiratory allergy. This condition is present in all parts of the world and its prevalence varies with regions. Most prevalence studies on rhinitis have used the methods of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC). These prevalences range from 23% to 30% in Europe, 12% to 30% in the USA and 5.5% to 45.1% in North America.1 In Africa, it varies from 7.2% to 27.3%.2 Although it is not fatal, allergic rhinitis generates costs and has a negative impact on the quality of life of patients. It harmfully affects school and professional performances.3–5 The occurrence of allergic rhinitis is conditioned by the conjunction of several factors such as atopy and several environmental factors, of which the leading are allergens and pollution. Among the allergens, pollens from plants and house dust mites are the most represented.6 Occupational allergens are involved in the onset of occupational allergic rhinitis. Flour and α-amylase used for the fermentation of yeast are the main risk factors of allergic rhinitis in bakers.7 ,8 Storage mites present in the flour also contribute to the development of this condition.9 In sub-Saharan Africa, few studies have been carried out on allergic rhinitis, even though this part of the world is increasingly being exposed to pollution and climatic conditions are getting more and more favourable to allergens such as dust mites and moulds.10 Bakery employees, apart from their usual exposure to aeroallergens, are often in contact with specific aeroallergens of their workplace.

    The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of allergic rhinitis and associated factors in bakers in the city of Douala.

    Methods

    Design and setting

    This was a cross-sectional study conducted from 1 May to 31 July 2013 in 42 randomly selected bakeries in the city of Douala in Cameroon. Douala is a seaside city in the central part of Africa located just above the equator. It is the economic capital of Cameroon and hosts many industries. The climate is hot and humid most of the year.

    Participants

    Bakery employees in regular contact with flour were included. Participants under 15 years, those with a non-allergic rhinitis or sinusitis and those declining to participate in the study were excluded.

    Data collection and variables

    Sociodemographic data, respiratory symptoms, medical history, family history of atopy, smoking status and characteristics of exposure to flour were collected using a face-to-face administered questionnaire. Allergic rhinitis was defined by the presence of at least one of the following symptoms: itchy nose, sneezing, nasal obstruction and rhinorrhea. Work-related symptoms were those triggered in the workplace. Rhinoconjunctivitis was defined by the association of symptoms of allergic rhinitis, ocular itching or eye tearing. Skin prick tests to 13 aeroallergens were performed. Allergens used were those from ALK laboratories (Varennes in Argonne, France). Aeroallergens present in bakeries included those from wheat flour and α-amylase, and four types of storage mites; and common aeroallergens included house dust mites, moulds and those originating from cat and dog fur, and German cockroaches. When searching for risk factors of allergic rhinitis, aeroallergens were grouped as follows: sensitisation to house dust mites was defined by positive skin prick tests to Dermatophagoides farinae and/or to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus. Similarly, sensitisation to storage mites was considered when a positive prick test to at least one of the following type of mites was observed: Lepidoglyphus destructor, Glycyphagus domesticus, Acarus siro and Tyroglyphus putrescentiae.

    Atopy was defined as a positive skin prick test to at least one of the common aeroallergens. The positive control was histamine and the negative control was glycerosaline solution. The test was read 15 min after application of the allergen solution. The test was positive when the diameter of induration was greater than (or equal to) 3 mm, or greater than 50% of the positive control.

    Data analysis

    Data was entered and analysed using SPSS V.20 for Windows. Descriptive statistics were used for general presentation of the sample. Univariate analysis was then performed, followed by logistic regression in order to identify risk factors of allergic rhinitis. Variables for which p value was less than (or equal) to 0.2 were introduced in the final model for multivariate analysis. The OR and CIs of 95% were determined. Statistical tests were considered significant for a p value of less than 0.05.

    Ethical clearance

    The protocol was submitted to the National Ethics Committee and the recruitment started after obtaining an ethical clearance as well as an oral consent from each participant.

    Results

    During the study period, a total of 273 bakers were invited and finally 229 bakers agreed to participate in this study, giving a response rate of 83.8%. The general characteristics of the study population are shown in table 1.

    View this table:
    Table 1

    General characteristics of participants

    Males were the most represented gender with 222 (96.9%) participants. The mean age was 36.29±8.9 years (range 20–58). The mean length of stay duration in the profession was 11.7±7.3 years (range 3–34), while the average duration of daily exposure to flour dust was 9.21±1.5 h (range 6–12). Smoking was found in 55 (24.5%) participants. The symptoms of allergic rhinitis were observed in 56 (24.5%) participants (24.5%). These symptoms were work related in 15.3% (35 participants). The prevalence of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis was 6.6% (15 participants) and the main symptoms of lower respiratory tract involvement were cough (25.8%) and wheezing (3.9%). The skin prick tests were positive in 51.5% of participants’ cases (figure 1).

    Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Prevalence of sensitisation to aeroallergens.

    Sensitisation to flour and α-amylase was observed in 16.6% and 8.3% of participants, respectively. Sensitisation to the German cockroach was found in 14.8% of participants. Table 2 shows the results of univariate analysis of risk factors of allergic rhinitis in the study population.

    View this table:
    Table 2

    Univariate analysis of risk factors of allergic rhinitis

    Length of time spent in the profession, sensitisation to wheat flour, to the German cockroach, to dog fur, to dust mites and to all common aeroallergens were associated with allergic rhinitis. The independent risk factors after multivariate analysis were sensitisations to flour and storage mites (table 3).

    View this table:
    Table 3

    Multivariate analysis of risk factors of allergic rhinitis

    Discussion

    This study on allergic rhinitis in bakers shows a prevalence of 24.5% of allergic rhinitis in this profession. It was work-related in 15.3%. Sensitisation to flour, α-amylase and current aeroallergens was found respectively in 16.6%, 8.3% and 39.7% of participants. Flour and storage mite sensitisation was found to be an independent risk factor of allergic rhinitis.

    From the 1980s, studies on the prevalence of allergic rhinitis in bakers increased. In Europe, the prevalence varies from 7% to 21% depending on the authors.11 In Africa, studies on respiratory allergies in bakers are scarce. In Morocco, Alaoui Yazidi et al12 found that 33% of bakers had allergic rhinitis. As for allergic rhinitis related to work, Houba et al13 and Jacobs et al14 reported 21% and 23%, respectively, in the Netherlands. Other authors reported higher prevalence of around 25% to 35%.15 ,16 This study had found 15.3% of work-related allergic rhinitis. This disparity could be explained by the different definitions of allergic rhinitis used in each study.

    With respect to risk factors of allergic rhinitis in this study, after adjustment, the sensitisations to wheat flour and storage mites were associated with the presence of allergic rhinitis. Several studies in the literature have found a significant relationship between sensitisation to wheat flour and allergic rhinitis.8 ,14 ,17 ,18 Indeed, wheat flour is a complex mixture of polypeptide and polysaccharide substances, many of which are potential allergens that can cause IgE-dependent sensitisation after inhalation. The analysis of wheat flour shows more than 100 spots of IgE binding proteins and analysis of bakers sensitised serum highlights not only several reactions to these antigens, but also a great individual sensitisation variability.19 Wheat flour consists of four classes of proteins, which include albumin, globulins, gliadins and glutenins. The most important IgE reaction in bakers’ respiratory allergy is due to proteins of molecular weight ranging between 12 and 17 kDa that are considered ‘major allergens’.20

    In this study, sensitisation to storage mites was independently associated with allergic rhinitis. This result corroborates that of Blainey et al21 who found an association between sensitisation to storage mites and respiratory allergy. However, De Zotti et al22 consider that storage mites are not real occupational aeroallergens in bakers and are instead a cause of immunological cosensitisations.

    Univariate analysis showed association between some factors and allergic rhinitis. These factors were no longer significantly associated in multivariate analysis. The named factor is length of time spent in the current profession of more than 10 years. Indeed, the latency period for the development of sensitisation to aeroallergens in professional bakers is short and longer for the occurrence of respiratory symptoms.23 ,24 Atopy was associated with allergic rhinitis. While most studies show that it is a risk factor for workplace aeroallergen sensitisation in bakers,7 ,8 ,14 ,16 its role as a factor associated with the occurrence of respiratory symptoms in bakers was not found by all authors.15 ,22 ,25 In this study, after multivariate analysis, atopy was not associated with allergic rhinitis. The limited definition of atopy in this study could explain this finding. In addition, the effect of atopy could have disappeared because of the significant sensitisation association between storage mites and allergic rhinitis, and atopy has been demonstrated to be associated with sensitisation to storage mites.26 As found by De Zotti et al,22 age and smoking were was not associated with allergic rhinitis.

    This study is among the first in sub-Saharan Africa that has sought an association between workplace aeroallergens and the symptoms of allergic rhinitis in bakers. The logistic regression, which is a pretty solid statistical method for the detection of associations between variables, was used in this study. Despite these strengths, there are some weaknesses: the measurement of the exposure to dust in bakeries was not made and the specific serum IgE antibodies measurements, a method with better specificity and sensitivity than that of skin prick tests, for the diagnosis of allergen sensitisation were not performed.

    Conclusion

    This study on respiratory allergies in bakers in Sub-Saharan Africa shows a high prevalence of allergic rhinitis and highlights the role of sensitisation to wheat flour and dust mites as risk factors for allergic rhinitis in bakers. Implementing protective measures against these aeroallergens and clinical monitoring of sensitised workers towards occupational aeroallergens could reduce the prevalence of this condition that, though not life-threatening, can significantly alter a baker’s quality of life.

    Acknowledgments

    Many thanks to all the bakery employees who agreed to participate in this study. The authors also thank the Pan African Thoracic Society MECOR course staff and the Douala Research Network for their suggestions during the preparation of the manuscript.

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Katelaris CH,
      2. Lee BW,
      3. Potter PC,
      4. et al
      . Prevalence and diversity of allergic rhinitis in regions of the world beyond Europe and North America. Clin Exp Allergy 2011;42:186–207.
      OpenUrl
    2. ↵
      1. Ait-Khaled N,
      2. Odhiambo J,
      3. Pearce N,
      4. et al
      . Prevalence of symptoms of asthma, rhinitis and eczema in 13- to 14-year-old children in Africa: the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood Phase III. Allergy 2007;62:247–58.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    3. ↵
      1. Baiardini I,
      2. Braido F,
      3. Tarantini F,
      4. et al
      . ARIA-suggested drugs for allergic rhinitis: what impact on quality of life? A GA2LEN Review. Allergy 2008;63:660–9.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    4. ↵
      1. Blaiss MS
      . Allergic rhinitis and impairment issues in schoolchildren: a consensus report. Curr Med Res Opin 2004;20:1937–52.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    5. ↵
      1. Shedden A
      . Impact of nasal congestion on quality of life and work productivity in allergic rhinitis: findings from a large online survey. Treat Respir Med 2005;4:439–46.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    6. ↵
      1. Wang DY
      . Risk factors of allergic rhinitis: genetic or environmental? Ther Clin Risk Manag 2005;1:115–23.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    7. ↵
      1. Gamelin L,
      2. Ameille J,
      3. Choudat D,
      4. et al
      . Rhinites allergiques professionnelles : bilan des données recueillies auprès de quatre consultations de pathologie professionnelle de la région parisienne, en 1997 et 1998. Arch Mal Prof 2001;62:374–5.
      OpenUrl
    8. ↵
      1. Walusiak J,
      2. Hanke W,
      3. Gorski P,
      4. et al
      . Respiratory allergy in apprentice bakers: do occupational allergies follow the allergic march? Allergy 2004;59:442–50.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    9. ↵
      1. Tee RD,
      2. Gordon DJ,
      3. Van Hage Hamsten M,
      4. et al
      . Comparison of allergenic responses to dust mites in UK bakery workers and Swedish farmers. Clin Exp Allergy 1992;22:233–9.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    10. ↵
      1. Takizawa H
      . Impact of air pollution on allergic diseases. Korean J Intern Med 2011;26:262–73.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    11. ↵
      1. Houba R,
      2. Doekes G,
      3. Heederik D
      . Occupational respiratory allergy in bakery workers: a review of the literature. Am J Ind Med 1998;34:529–46.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    12. ↵
      1. Alaoui Yazidi A,
      2. Bakhatar A,
      3. Laraqui CH,
      4. et al
      . Sensibilisation à la farine et aux pneumallergènes en boulangerie et pâtisserie à Casablanca. Rev Fr Allergol Immunol Clin 2001;41:555–64.
      OpenUrl
    13. ↵
      1. Houba R,
      2. Heederik D,
      3. Doekes G
      . Wheat sensitization and work-related symptoms in the baking industry are preventable. An epidemiologic study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;158(5 Pt 1): 1499–503.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    14. ↵
      1. Jacobs JH,
      2. Meijster T,
      3. Meijer E,
      4. et al
      . Wheat allergen exposure and the prevalence of work-related sensitization and allergy in bakery workers. Allergy 2008;63:1597–604.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    15. ↵
      1. Cullinan P,
      2. Lowson D,
      3. Nieuwenhuijsen MJ,
      4. et al
      . Work related symptoms, sensitisation, and estimated exposure in workers not previously exposed to flour. Occup Environ Med 1994;51:579–83.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    16. ↵
      1. Harris-Roberts J,
      2. Robinson E,
      3. Waterhouse JC,
      4. et al
      . Sensitization to wheat flour and enzymes and associated respiratory symptoms in British bakers. Am J Ind Med 2009;52:133–40.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    17. ↵
      1. De Zotti R,
      2. Bovenzi M
      . Prospective study of work related respiratory symptoms in trainee bakers. Occup Environ Med 2000;57:58–61.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    18. ↵
      1. Prichard MG,
      2. Ryan G,
      3. Muska AW
      . Wheat flour sensitisation and airways disease in urban bakers. Br J Ind Med 1984;41:450–4.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    19. ↵
      1. Sander I,
      2. Flagge A,
      3. Merget R,
      4. et al
      . Identification of wheat flour allergens by means of 2-dimensional immunoblotting. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2001;107:907–13.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    20. ↵
      1. Gomez L,
      2. Martin E,
      3. Hernandez D,
      4. et al
      . Members of the α-amylase inhibitors family from wheat endosperm are major allergens associated with baker's asthma. FEBS Lett 1990;261:85–8.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    21. ↵
      1. Blainey AD,
      2. Topping MD,
      3. Ollier S,
      4. et al
      . Allergic respiratory disease in grain workers: the role of storage mites. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1989;84:296–303.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    22. ↵
      1. De Zotti R,
      2. Larese F,
      3. Bovenzi M,
      4. et al
      . Allergic airway disease in Italian bakers and pastry makers. Occup Environ Med 1994;51:548–22.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    23. ↵
      1. Fishwick D,
      2. Harris-Roberts J,
      3. Robinson E,
      4. et al
      . Impact of worker education on respiratory symptoms and sensitization in bakeries. Occup Med (Lond) 2011;61:321–7.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    24. ↵
      1. Smith T
      . Latent period for symptomatic sensitization in bakeries. Occup Med (Lond) 2005;55:93–5.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    25. ↵
      1. Cullinan P,
      2. Cook A,
      3. Nieuwenhuijsen MJ,
      4. et al
      . Allergen and dust exposure as determinants of work-related symptoms and sensitization in a cohort of flour-exposed workers; a case-control analysis. Ann Occup Hyg 2001;45:97–103.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    26. ↵
      1. Tee RD
      . Allergy to storage mites: review. Clin Exp Allergy 1994;24:636–40.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science

    Footnotes

    • Contributors BHMN conceptualised the study, designed the protocol, analysed the data and drafted the manuscript. EN collected the data. EAZ, FN and RNL revised the manuscript. YMN participated in administrative and technical support.

    • Funding This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests None.

    • Patient consent Obtained.

    • Ethics approval National ethics committee.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    • Data sharing statement No additional data are available.