Responses

Download PDFPDF

Prevalence of prediabetes in England from 2003 to 2011: population-based, cross-sectional study
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Bias in the study of prevalence of pre-diabetes in England from 2003 to 2011

    The present study shows an increase in the prevalence of prediabetes in England since 2003 till 2011. The population based study has strengths in terms of having an appropriate sampling method, with blood samples for glycated haemoglobin level estimation for diagnosis of pre diabetes state. However, some factors need to be considered while analyzing the results.

    Firstly, the reported hypertension in the study co...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.