Article Text

Download PDFPDF

A nationwide survey on the expectation of public healthcare providers on family medicine specialists in Malaysia—a qualitative analysis of 623 written comments
  1. Boon-How Chew1,
  2. Ai-Theng Cheong1,
  3. Mastura Ismail2,
  4. Zuhra Hamzah3,
  5. Mohd-Radzniwan A-Rashid3,
  6. Mazapuspavina Md-Yasin4,
  7. Norsiah Ali5
  1. 1Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
  2. 2Health Clinic Seremban 2, Ministry of Health, Seremban, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
  3. 3Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  4. 4Primary Care Medicine Discipline, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia
  5. 5Health Clinic Tampin, Ministry of Health, Tampin, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Boon-How Chew; chewboonhow{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Objective To examine the expectation of public healthcare providers/professionals (PHCPs) who are working closely with family medicine specialists (FMSs) at public health clinics.

Design Cross-sectional study.

Setting This study is part of a larger national study on the perception of the Malaysian public healthcare professionals on FMSs.

Participants PHCPs from three categories of health facilities, namely hospitals, health clinics and health offices.

Main outcome measures Qualitative analysis of written comments of respondents’ expectation of FMSs.

Results The participants’ response rate was 58% (780/1345) with an almost equal proportion from each public healthcare facility. We identified 21 subthemes for the 623 expectation comments. The six emerging themes are (1) need for more FMSs, (2) clinical roles and functions of FMSs, (3) administrative roles of FMSs, (4) contribution to community and public health, (5) attributes improvement and (6) research and audits. FMSs were expected to give attention to clinical duty. Delivering this responsibility with competence included having the latest medical knowledge in their own and others’ medical disciplines, practising evidence-based medicine in prehospital and posthospital care, better supervision of staff and doctors under their care, fostering effective teamwork, communicating more often with hospital specialists and making appropriate referral. Expectations ranged from definite and strong for more FMSs at the health clinics to low expectation for FMSs’ involvement in research; to mal-expectation on FMSs’ involvement in community and public health programmes.

Conclusions There were some remarkable differences in expectations on FMSs from the three different PHCPs. These ranged from being clinically competent and administratively available for patients and staff at the health clinics, to mal-expectations on FMSs to engage in public health affairs. Relevant parties, including FMSs themselves, could take appropriate self-improvement initiatives to enhance public practice of family medicine and patient care.

Trial registration number NMRR ID: 08-12-1167.

  • Primary Care
  • Qualitative Research
  • Medical Education & Training

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.