You are here

Article Text

Article menu

This article has a correction. Please see:

Download PDFPDF

XML
Paediatrics
Research
Preterm nutritional intake and MRI phenotype at term age: a prospective observational study
  1. Vimal Vasu1,2,
  2. Giuliana Durighel3,
  3. Louise Thomas3,
  4. Christina Malamateniou4,5,
  5. Jimmy D Bell3,
  6. Mary A Rutherford4,5,
  7. Neena Modi1
  1. 1Section of Neonatal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital Campus, London, UK
  2. 2Department of Child Health, William Harvey Hospital, Ashford, Kent, UK
  3. 3Metabolic and Molecular Imaging Group, MRC Clinical Sciences Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK
  4. 4Division of Clinical Sciences, Imperial College London, MRC Clinical Sciences Centre Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
  5. 5Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, Division of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Vimal Vasu; vimal.vasu{at}nhs.net

Abstract

Objective To describe (1) the relationship between nutrition and the preterm-at-term infant phenotype, (2) phenotypic differences between preterm-at-term infants and healthy term born infants and (3) relationships between somatic and brain MRI outcomes.

Design Prospective observational study.

Setting UK tertiary neonatal unit.

Participants Preterm infants (<32 weeks gestation) (n=22) and healthy term infants (n=39)

Main outcome measures Preterm nutrient intake; total and regional adipose tissue (AT) depot volumes; brain volume and proximal cerebral arterial vessel tortuosity (CAVT) in preterm infants and in term infants.

Results Preterm nutrition was deficient in protein and high in carbohydrate and fat. Preterm nutrition was not related to AT volumes, brain volume or proximal CAVT score; a positive association was noted between human milk intake and proximal CAVT score (r=0.44, p=0.05). In comparison to term infants, preterm infants had increased total adiposity, comparable brain volumes and reduced proximal CAVT scores. There was a significant negative correlation between deep subcutaneous abdominal AT volume and brain volume in preterm infants (r=−0.58, p=0.01).

Conclusions Though there are significant phenotypic differences between preterm infants at term and term infants, preterm macronutrient intake does not appear to be a determinant. Our preliminary data suggest that (1) human milk may exert a beneficial effect on cerebral arterial vessel tortuosity and (2) there is a negative correlation between adiposity and brain volume in preterm infants at term. Further work is warranted to see if our findings can be replicated and to understand the causal mechanisms.

  • Neonatology

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005390

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Strengths and limitations of this study

    • There have been no previously published studies regarding the relationship between preterm nutritional intake and MRI outcomes at term age.

    • This study provides comprehensive ascertainment of preterm nutritional data in parallel with somatic and brain MRI.

    • Another strength of this study is the use of term born infants as comparator for MRI outcomes.

    • Weaknesses included limited sample size and the prospective observational nature of the study.

    Introduction

    Preterm nutritional guidelines are based on consensus expert opinion1 ,2 rather than compelling evidence and the ‘optimal’ diet for long-term health remains unknown.3 Though there is now greater clinical emphasis on preterm nutrition, protein deficiency remains a significant risk and our previously published data in 18 preterm infants from a single centre indicate that the preterm diet is low in protein while being high in carbohydrate and fat.4 Our data also suggest that preterm macronutrition may affect later health by demonstrating a positive association between first week lipid intake in preterm infants and elevated intrahepatocellular lipid, which in adults is associated with the cardiometabolic syndrome.5

    The preterm phenotype at term is characterised by aberrant adipose tissue (AT) partitioning,6 reduced proximal cerebral arterial vessel tortuosity (CAVT),7 reduced deep grey matter volumes8 and reduced cerebral cortical folding.9 The somatic phenotype observed is a matter of concern as adiposity is associated with inflammation and reduced brain volume in the adult population.10

    Here, we present prospective observational data designed to (1) assess the influence of nutrition on the preterm phenotype at term age, (2) describe phenotypic differences between preterm infants at term and term healthy infants and (3) examine relationships between somatic and brain MRI measurements. The a priori hypotheses of our study were that (1) preterm macronutrient intake would be positively associated with central nervous system phenotype (brain volume and cerebral vessel tortuosity) and (2) preterm macronutrient intake would be negatively associated with internal abdominal (visceral) adiposity. The relationship between somatic and brain MRI outcomes represents a post hoc exploratory analysis.

    Patients and methods

    Following research ethics approval (REC 07/Q0403/46) and informed parental consent, preterm infants admitted to the Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Neonatal Unit, London, UK (<32 weeks of gestation) and term infants (37–42 weeks gestation) on the postnatal ward were recruited (January 2007–July 2008). Infants with congenital anomalies were excluded.

    Preterm nutrition and growth

    Preterm nutritional practice during the study period has been previously described.4 In brief, enteral feeds were started on day 1 with either maternal expressed breast milk or donor expressed breast milk prior to consideration of the use of formula. Human milk fed infants received Nutriprem breast milk fortifier (Cow & Gate) once 150 mL/kg/day of feed volume was reached. Parenteral nutrition was started on the day of birth.

    Weight and head circumference data for the preterm group are expressed as SD scores (SDS) at birth and at the time of MRI. Birth length was not routinely measured during the study period. Macronutrient and human milk intake was recorded between birth and 34+6 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) using a nutritional data capture system designed in-house (Nutcracker, Imperial College, London, UK). Macronutrient data were expressed as the difference between recommended daily intake (RDI) from Tsang et al1 and actual daily intake in grams or kilocalories/kilogram for the period of either early (first week of life) or total nutrition (birth and 34+6 PMA).4 Human milk intake is expressed as mL/kg/day and as percentage of enteral feeds given as human milk.

    MRI

    MRI was performed at the Robert Steiner Unit, Hammersmith Hospital shortly after discharge from the neonatal unit as previously described4 using a Philips Achieva system (Best, the Netherlands).

    Total and regional AT

    Imaging parameters are shown in table 1. Regional AT depots were classified as total superficial subcutaneous, total deep subcutaneous and total internal and subdivided into abdominal or non-abdominal (figures 1 and 2). AT volumes were calculated as previously described.6 Non-AT mass was calculated by conversion of AT volume to AT mass (density of AT of 0.9 g/cm3) and subtraction of the result from weight at the time of MRI.

    View this table:
    Table 1

    MRI parameters for adipose tissue, brain volume and proximal cerebral arterial vessel tortuosity

    Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Classification of adipose tissue depots into internal, superficial subcutaneous and deep subcutaneous depots and further subclassification according to abdominal or non-abdominal position.

    Figure 2
    Figure 2

    T1-weighted axial MRI (abdominal level) demonstrating the deep and superficial subcutaneous adipose tissue depots. A clear fascial plane is noted between the superficial and deep subcutaneous layers (arrows).

    Brain volume

    T2-weighted images were acquired using a dynamic sequence of six separate loops of single shot images which were then registered and reconstructed to produce volumetric datasets to eliminate the effects of motion artefact.11 Imaging parameters are shown in table 1. Images were corrected for radiofrequency inhomogeneity (http://mipav.cit.nih.gov). BET Brain extraction tool FSL V.3 (http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/)12 was then used to delete non-brain tissue and create binary brain masks representing intracranial volume.13 A mask of ventricular and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) spaces was created using the thresholding feature of Image J, a java-based image processing program.14 Brain volume was calculated by subtraction of the volume of the ventricular and CSF masks from the volume of the intracranial mask using ImageJ (figure 3). Brain MRIs were reported by MR for clinical purposes and given a score (0–13) adapted from Dyet et al15 so that, if necessary, pathological findings could be accounted for.

    Figure 3
    Figure 3

    (A) T2-weighted MRI undergoes RF inhomogeneity correction and subsequent creation of a binary brain mask of intracranial volume (BET brain extraction tool FSL V.3). (B) Creation of a mask of the ventricular and cerebrospinal fluid spaces using the thresholding feature of ImageJ V.1.38. (C) Calculation of actual brain volume by subtraction of ventricular and cerebrospinal volume from intracranial volume.

    Proximal CAVT measurement and analysis

    An optimised neonatal three-dimensional time of flight MR angiography sequence was used to assess the anterior, middle and posterior cerebral arteries.7 Imaging parameters are shown in table 1. Vessel tortuosity was assessed using a previously validated measurement, distance factor16 (figure 4), and a CAVT score was determined as a global measure of tortuosity for each participant by calculating the mean of the anterior cerebral artery, middle cerebral artery and posterior cerebral artery distance factor.

    Figure 4
    Figure 4

    (A) Axial MR angiogram demonstrating the tracing of a contour along the left middle cerebral artery for 30 mm (black line) along with a straight line measurement between the start point and the end point of the traced contour (red line). (B) Sagittal MR angiogram demonstrating the tracing of a contour along the anterior cerebral artery for 30 mm (black line) along with a straight line measurement between the start point and the end point of the traced contour (red line).

    Illness severity

    CRIB II Score was calculated in preterm infants.17

    Sample size calculation and analyses

    Based on previous work,6 we estimated that recruitment of 60 preterm and 60 term infants allowed detection of a 0.5 SD difference between the groups for AT volume (power 80%, significance 5%). As this was an exploratory hypothesis-generating prospective observational study and given the uncertainty as to what differences were of clinical importance, additional sample size calculations were not considered. Data were adjusted for relevant confounding variables where appropriate and are presented for each of the MR outcomes with a comparison of outcomes between the groups. Data were analysed by comparison of means and tested for normality. Parametric or non-parametric methods were then applied accordingly. Within the preterm group, Pearson correlation was used to investigate the relationship between nutrition and MR outcomes at term age and these were limited to the patients in whom both nutritional data and the MRI outcome were successfully acquired. For a multivariate analysis, a minimum of 10n participants is considered appropriate, where n is the number of covariates. Data are presented as mean (SD) or mean (95% CI).

    Results

    Sixty-one infants were recruited during the study (preterm 22, term 39). MR images without motion artefact were acquired as follows: AT volume (preterm 22, term 39), brain volume (preterm 19, term 19) and CAVT measurement (preterm 20, term 13). In preterm infants, mean (SD) CRIB II score was 7.6 (4.2). Twenty-five per cent had chronic lung disease of prematurity (defined as an oxygen requirement at 36 weeks PMA), 20% had a patent ductus arteriosus requiring pharmacological therapy, 5% had retinopathy of prematurity requiring laser therapy and 5% had a large intraventricular haemorrhage (grade III/IV Papile classification). 0% had necrotising enterocolitis requiring surgery. Table 2 summarises the baseline and imaging characteristics and the MR outcomes of the preterm and term groups.

    View this table:
    Table 2

    Birth characteristics, imaging characteristics and MRI outcomes in preterm-at-term and term infants

    Preterm nutrition and growth

    Growth and nutrition data for the preterm cohort have been previously published.4 In brief, the mean (SD) for birth weight and birth head circumference SDS were: −0.13 (0.78) and −0.64 (1.12). At the time of MRI, the respective values were −1.39 (0.93) and −0.86 (1.33). Weight gain was mean (SD) 9.48 (1.73) g/kg/day between birth and 34+6 weeks. Preterm macronutrient intakes for both the first week after birth and for the period from birth until 34+6 weeks PMA revealed a mean protein deficit (first week: −1.6 g/kg/day; birth until 34+6 weeks −0.4 g/kg/day) in the context of excessive carbohydrate and fat intake. Mean (SD) human milk intakes for these periods were 36.6 (29.7) and 108.9 (46.6) mL/kg/day, respectively.

    Preterm nutrition and MRI outcomes

    Human milk and MRI outcomes

    After adjustment for weight at MRI, there was no correlation between early or total human milk intake and either regional AT volumes or brain volume at term age. There was no correlation between early human milk intake and overall CAVT score (r=0.31, p=0.18); however, there was a weak positive relationship between total human milk intake and overall CAVT score (r=0.44, p=0.05) (figure 5). This relationship was also apparent when total human milk intake was expressed as a percentage of total milk intake (r=0.45, p=0.04).

    Figure 5
    Figure 5

    Relationship between proximal cerebral arterial vessel tortuosity (CAVT) score at term and total human milk intake (birth to 34+6 weeks PMA) in preterm infants.

    Macronutrient intake and MRI outcomes

    There were no correlations between macronutrient intake (protein, carbohydrate, fat) and total adiposity (n=22). After adjustment for PMA, neither early nor total preterm macronutrient intake was correlated with brain volume at term age (n=19). There were no relationships noted between early or total macronutrient intake and proximal CAVT score (n=20), a summary measure of tortuosity.

    Preterm at term versus term group comparison

    Anthropometry

    Anthropometric data were adjusted for PMA at the time of MRI. Preterm infants were smaller, shorter and had smaller head circumferences than term infants (table 2).

    Adiposity

    Adipose tissue data were adjusted for PMA at the time of MRI. Preterm infants had more AT than term infants with expansion of the superficial subcutaneous, deep subcutaneous and internal AT depots. There was a parallel reduction in non-AT mass (table 2).

    Brain volume

    Brain MRI scores in the cohort of preterm infants were mean (SD) 3.6 (2.1). There was no correlation between brain MRI score and brain volume (r=0.31, p=0.20). At term age, preterm brain volumes were smaller than those for term infants (PT 461.74 (436.16–487.32) mL vs 493.74 (476.43–511.05) mL, p=0.05). However, after adjustment for weight at the time of MRI, a significant confounding factor, there was no difference between the groups. Preterm-at-term infants had significantly increased CSF volume (table 2).

    Distance factor and proximal CAVT score

    In comparison to term born infants, preterm-at-term infants had a significant reduction in CAVT (table 2).

    Relationships between somatic and central nervous system MRI phenotype

    After adjustment for weight at MRI, there was a significant negative correlation noted in preterm-at-term infants but not in term infants, between deep subcutaneous AT volume and brain volume (r=−0.58, p=0.01) (table 3). There were no statistically significant correlations between regional AT and CAVT score.

    View this table:
    Table 3

    Pearson correlations between regional AT depots and brain volume in preterm-at-term and term infants adjusted for weight at imaging

    Discussion

    We identify novel findings of interest including a positive association between human milk intake and proximal CAVT, a marker of cerebrovascular development and a negative correlation between regional adipose tissue volume and brain volume in preterm infants. The study also comprehensively characterises the somatic and brain phenotypes of a cohort of preterm infants at term in comparison to term born healthy infants and demonstrates (1) reduced anthropometric measures, (2) increased total and regional adiposity, (3) reduced non-adipose tissue mass, (4) comparable brain volumes, (5) increased CSF volume and (6) reduced proximal cerebral arterial vessel tortuosity. We have shown no relationship with either body composition or brain volume at term age within the range of macronutritional intakes received by the preterm infants in this study.

    Key study strengths include the comprehensive ascertainment of preterm nutritional data and the assessment of a number of MR outcomes. Limitations include the prospective observational design of the study that preclude any inferences regarding causality, and the ‘suboptimal’ preterm nutritional intake, a potential determinant of the observed phenotype. Successful acquisition of a number of different MR outcomes without use of sedation was challenging and the motion artefact meant that not all recruited infants had data of sufficient quality for analysis. We were unable to recruit the desired number of infants and recognise that the study may be underpowered. The preterm infants studied were relatively healthy, as evidenced by low illness severity (CRIB II scores), low incidences of serious neonatal morbidity and low brain MR scores, factors that may have attenuated any associations with nutritional intake.

    The finding of increased adiposity in preterm infants confirms our previous work.6 We have previously shown expansion of the internal abdominal AT compartment in preterm-at-term infants in comparison to term born infants in a cohort of preterm infants recruited in 2002–2003,6 a time at which neonatal nutrition was possibly not as carefully considered as it is today. This contrasts with our present data which demonstrate a global expansion of all AT depots. Whether the differences observed in AT partitioning between these studies relate to changes in nutritional practices and the provision of a more calorie dense diet is a plausible but as yet unproven hypothesis. Other potential mechanisms, which we have not explored, that might explain the increased adiposity seen in preterm infants include weight cycling and inflammation. It is known that cycling between high-calorie diets and low-calorie diets (weight cycling)18 results in the preferential deposition of AT over non-AT mass19 and this phenomenon often occurs in preterm infants when enteral feeds are discontinued because of concerns regarding feed intolerance and then restarted. Inflammation is also a known determinant of adiposity20 and it is possible that the proinflammatory milieu often present in the perinatal period (maternal chorioamnionitis, use of intravenous lipid formulations high in omega-6 fatty acids and postnatal infection/ inflammation) may be relevant to the observed phenotype.

    The nutritional intake received by this cohort of preterm infants was imbalanced (low in protein and high in fat and carbohydrate) and suboptimal in relation to expert consensus recommendations.1 ,2) In animal models, protein deficiency is associated with a number of adverse health outcomes including a reduction in lifespan,21 cardiovascular dysfunction,22 reduced dendritic spine density23 reduced brain weight24 and reduced cortical blood vessel density25 Human adult data indicate that dietary protein is an important factor in body weight regulation.26 Recent data in human ex-preterm infants suggest an association between early growth patterns and fractional anisotropy, a measure of brain microstructure.27 Our group has previously shown that preterm-at-term AT deposition can be attenuated by use of fortified human milk.28 Whether this translates into a longer term benefit is unknown.

    The negative correlation we show between adiposity in preterm-at-term infants and brain volume is consistent with the findings in adults and children10 ,29 ,30. This, notwithstanding preterm-at-term brain volume, was comparable to that of term born healthy infants, which is also in keeping with previously published work.31 This, together with the finding of maintained head circumference SDS between birth and time of imaging, may be indicative of ‘brain sparing’ in nutritionally compromised infants.

    We have confirmed the finding of reduced proximal CAVT in preterm infants.7 Though the natural history and long-term neurodevelopmental sequelae of reduced CAVT are unknown, epidemiological data indicate that advancing gestation confers a significant reduction in risk of fatal adult cerebrovascular disease (occlusive stroke).32 Our observation that human milk may be protective despite low macronutrient density suggests that non-nutritive factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor, may play an important role in cerebrovascular development.

    In conclusion, we have extended the characterisation of the preterm-at-term phenotype. Our data do not support an association between macronutrient intake and body composition or brain volume. Other plausible determinants that remain to be explored are the roles of micronutrient deficiency, weight cycling, disease severity and chronic inflammation.

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Tsang R,
      2. Uauy R,
      3. Koletzko B,
      4. et al
      . Nutrition of the preterm infant: scientific basis and practical guidelines. 2nd edn. Cincinnati, OH: Digital Education Publishing, Inc, 2005:415–16.
    2. ↵
      1. Agostoni C,
      2. Buonocore G,
      3. Carnielli VP,
      4. et al
      . Enteral nutrient supply for preterm infants: commentary from the European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Committee on Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2010;50:85–91.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    3. ↵
      1. Vasu V,
      2. Modi N
      . Assessing the impact of preterm nutrition. Early Hum Dev 2007;83:813–18.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    4. ↵
      1. Vasu V,
      2. Thomas EL,
      3. Durighel G,
      4. et al
      . Early nutritional determinants of intrahepatocellular lipid deposition in preterm infants at term age. Int J Obes (Lond) 2013;37:500–4.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    5. ↵
      1. Mehta SR,
      2. Godsland IF,
      3. Thomas EL,
      4. et al
      . Intrahepatic insulin exposure, intrahepatocellular lipid and regional body fat in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012;97:2151–9.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    6. ↵
      1. Uthaya S,
      2. Thomas EL,
      3. Hamilton G,
      4. et al
      . Altered adiposity after extremely preterm birth. Pediatr Res 2005;57:221–5.
      OpenUrl
    7. ↵
      1. Malamateniou C,
      2. Counsell SJ,
      3. Allsop JM,
      4. et al
      . The effect of preterm birth on neonatal cerebral vasculature studied with magnetic resonance angiography at 3 Tesla. Neuroimage 2006;32:1050–9.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    8. ↵
      1. Srinivasan L,
      2. Dutta R,
      3. Counsell SJ,
      4. et al
      . Quantification of deep gray matter in preterm infants at term-equivalent age using manual volumetry of 3-tesla magnetic resonance images. Pediatrics 2007;119:759–65.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    9. ↵
      1. Ajayi-Obe M,
      2. Saeed N,
      3. Cowan FM,
      4. et al
      . Reduced development of cerebral cortex in extremely preterm infants. Lancet 2000;356:1162–3.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    10. ↵
      1. Debette S,
      2. Wolf C,
      3. Lambert JC,
      4. et al
      . Abdominal obesity and lower gray matter volume: a Mendelian randomization study. Neurobiol Aging 2014;35:378–86.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    11. ↵
      1. Jiang S,
      2. Xue H,
      3. Glover A,
      4. et al
      . MRI of moving subjects using multislice snapshot images with volume reconstruction (SVR): application to fetal, neonatal, and adult brain studies. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2007;26:967–80.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    12. ↵
      1. Smith SM,
      2. Jenkinson M,
      3. Woolrich MW,
      4. et al
      . Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 2004;23(Suppl 1):S208–19.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    13. ↵
      1. Smith SM
      . Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 2002;17:143–55.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    14. ↵
      1. Rasband WS
      . ImageJ. Bethesda, MD, USA: U S National Institutes of Health. http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/, 1997–2012.
    15. ↵
      1. Dyet LE,
      2. Kennea N,
      3. Counsell SJ,
      4. et al
      . Natural history of brain lesions in extremely preterm infants studied with serial magnetic resonance imaging from birth and neurodevelopmental assessment. Pediatrics 2006;118:536–48.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    16. ↵
      1. Bullitt E,
      2. Gerig G,
      3. Pizer SM,
      4. et al
      . Measuring tortuosity of the intracerebral vasculature from MRA images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2003;22:1163–71.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    17. ↵
      1. Parry G,
      2. Tucker J,
      3. Tarnow-Mordi W
      . CRIB II: an update of the Clinical Risk Index for Babies score. Lancet 2003;361:1789–91.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    18. ↵
      1. Brownell KD,
      2. Greenwood MR,
      3. Stellar E,
      4. et al
      . The effects of repeated cycles of weight loss and regain in rats. Physiol Behav 1986;38:459–64.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    19. ↵
      1. Rodin J,
      2. Radke-Sharpe N,
      3. Rebuffé-Scrive M,
      4. et al
      . Weight cycling and fat distribution. Int J Obes 1990;14:303–10.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    20. ↵
      1. So PW,
      2. Herlihy AH,
      3. Bell JD
      . Adiposity induced by adenovirus inoculation. Int J Obes (Lond) 2005;29:603–6.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    21. ↵
      1. Ozanne SE,
      2. Hales CN
      . Lifespan: catch-up growth and obesity in male mice. Nature 2004;427:411–12.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    22. ↵
      1. Cleal JK,
      2. Poore KR,
      3. Boullin JP,
      4. et al
      . Mismatched pre- and postnatal nutrition leads to cardiovascular dysfunction and altered renal function in adulthood. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2007;104:9529–33.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    23. ↵
      1. Garcia-Ruiz M,
      2. az-Cintra S,
      3. Cintra L,
      4. et al
      . Effect of protein malnutrition on CA3 hippocampal pyramidal cells in rats of three ages. Brain Res 1993;625:203–12.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    24. ↵
      1. Perez-Torrero E,
      2. Torrero C,
      3. Salas M
      . Effects of perinatal undernourishment on neuronal development of the facial motor nucleus in the rat. Brain Res 2001;905:54–62.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    25. ↵
      1. Bennis-Taleb N,
      2. Remacle C,
      3. Hoet JJ,
      4. et al
      . A low-protein diet during gestation affects brain development and alters permanently cerebral cortex blood vessels in rat offspring. J Nutr 1999;129:1613–19.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    26. ↵
      1. Westerterp-Plantenga MS,
      2. Lejeune MP,
      3. Nijs I,
      4. et al
      . High protein intake sustains weight maintenance after body weight loss in humans. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2004;28:57–64.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    27. ↵
      1. Vinall J,
      2. Grunau RE,
      3. Brant R,
      4. et al
      . Slower postnatal growth is associated with delayed cerebral cortical maturation in preterm newborns. Sci Transl Med 2013;5:168ra8.
    28. ↵
      1. Uthaya S,
      2. Thomas EL,
      3. Bell J,
      4. et al
      . Improved growth and adipose tissue partitioning in preterm infants receiving exclusive enteral feeds of fortified human milk in comparison with infants receiving human milk and formula. Proceedings of the Neonatal Society. 2007. http://www.neonatalsociety.ac.uk/abstracts/uthayas_2007_growthfortifiedfeeds.shtml
    29. ↵
      1. Yau PL,
      2. Castro MG,
      3. Tagani A,
      4. et al
      . Obesity and metabolic syndrome and functional and structural brain impairments in adolescence. Pediatrics 2012;130:e856–64.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    30. ↵
      1. Debette S,
      2. Beiser A,
      3. Hoffmann U,
      4. et al
      . Visceral fat is associated with lower brain volume in healthy middle-aged adults. Ann Neurol 2010;68:136–44.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    31. ↵
      1. Boardman JP,
      2. Counsell SJ,
      3. Rueckert D,
      4. et al
      . Early growth in brain volume is preserved in the majority of preterm infants. Ann Neurol 2007;62:185–92.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    32. ↵
      1. Koupil I,
      2. Leon DA,
      3. Lithell HO
      . Length of gestation is associated with mortality from cerebrovascular disease. J Epidemiol Community Health 2005;59:473–4.
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Contributors VV helped design the original prospective study, analysed the brain MRI data, drafted the initial manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted. GD optimised the MRI parameters for the study. LT coordinated the analysis of the adipose tissue MRI data. CM optimised the MR angiography and advised on vessel tortuosity measurements. JB was involved in the study design and supervised the analysis of the adipose tissue MRI data. MAR was involved in the study design and supervised the analysis of the brain MRI data. NM was involved with the study design and supervised the analysis of neonatal nutritional data. All authors critically reviewed and revised the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

    • Funding United Kingdom Medical Research Council; Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

    • Competing interests None.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    • Data sharing statement No additional data are available.

    Linked Articles

    • Correction
      Correction
      British Medical Journal Publishing Group
      BMJ Open 2014; 4 - Published Online First: 15 Jun 2014. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005390corr1